Recent content by quiet.tea

Recording directly to another location just adds two more points of failure. If either location loses Internet connectivity, the recordings will be lost.

Someone at reddit said it worked on an i5-6600. See the thread at .

Fiber would be my choice as it will not be affected by the power line. It will also prevent possible ground loop issues in the future. Use pre-terminated cables unless you already know how to terminate fiber.

Same here. It works fine with my Chromium based browsers other than the constant nagging to install the web plugin. I wish there was a way to disable it :p

The gator is bored and wondering where are the daily tourists :D

Some of my considerations when I consider setting up a VLAN include, 1. Group devices with similar functions 2. Group devices with similar security requirements 3. The need to inspect or control traffic to and from the VLAN. Traffic within the same VLANs are not easily inspected or controlled...

What are the lengths of your outdoor cables? You did say the NVR is 4 feet away but I just want to confirm. Can you take you outdoor cables inside and test them with the camera? Did you try with a pre-made cable?

I believe @master_tinkerer understands overall network concepts pretty well though. The network diagram shows a network that is more complex that 99.9% of most homes and small businesses. There is the router symbol on the Netgear PR60X but no indication of a trunk between it and the Netgear...

I've got to try this out and see how well my camera switches between day and night. Thanks @TheE for bringing this up.

My Greenlee branded glow in the dark sticks have lasted for many years. Granted I only use them occasionally and not in a work environment.

This is the first time I have heard of this on a security camera. My guess is some kind of proxy software was installed to allow the forwarding to happen.

Did someone hack into one of your cameras and compromise your network?

In your example, there are two network segments mentioned: VLAN 20 with the subnet 192.168.0.0/24, and another segment with the subnet 192.168.20.0/24. It's presumed that both subnets use a netmask of 255.255.255.0. VLANs (Virtual Local Area Networks) allow for the logical segmentation of...

I just encountered the bug too and came looking here for a solution. Looks like it might take a while, if ever, for it to be fixed.

I'm looking forward to this event!