Saw a meraki post on linked in about cameras, has to look lol.`

tangent

IPCT Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
4,342
Reaction score
3,524
It's "cloud managed" so it must be good :facepalm: only 720p at those prices.
 

hmjgriffon

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
980
Location
North Florida
Looks like it might record a 720p substream to the sd card, not sure marketing on this one is subpar.
could be, but I'm fairly certain you could find a dahua or similar to blow it out of the water for much cheaper :D
 

thomaswde

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
44
Reaction score
62
Location
NW, GA
Oh look my first topic on IPcamTalk that I actually know a little something about ;)

I just learned about Meraki last week at a Cisco event in AZ where I had dinner with their global business development manager. Meraki (which is now Cisco Miraki) cameras are better seen as a subscription model for surveillance costs then a camera purchase. Obviously a 720p h.264 dome cam with like 20m IR doesn't sound amazing at $1500. What they offer is essentially 3 years (I think) of fully "offloaded" management and storage (sort of) plus the camera provided at a rate of $1500 (outdoor model). A couple notes here, Cisco usually has 45-55% margin available just to the partner selling the solution on stuff like this, and this is not aimed at home/private users at all. Meraki targets education, manufacturing, and hospitality primarily where 1-5 IT guys are managing everything from AD, a thousand users, a network, etc, etc so a "plug-n-play" model for cameras can be really appealing, especially when the selling partner can really sell this stuff at $900 a cam or so on a big roll out. For an enterprise to deploy a 20 camera solution, complete with management and storage for about $25k every 3 years they are winning all day long when compared to other enterprise class solutions.

For comparison (granted, not apples to apples):
20 good IP cameras from someone like HikVison would run maybe $5-7k right? Double that if they go with someone higher tier like Vivotek. (you can't take Dahua into consideration here because from an enterprise standpoint they are brand new in the market here, all enterprises care about is support/reputation.
20TB useable capacity from an enterprise storage vendor (like NetApp, Pure, or EMC) would be at a minimum $30k with 3 year support contract. Maybe $20k if you go NetApp E-Series and just get a dumb SAN array. Then you have to back that all up, so another $10k for a Barracuda appliance w/ cloud archive.
Let's assume you're already running a virtualized cluster and don't have to add a physical server, (which would be another $5-10k or so with support) you're still in that solution for way more than Meraki's offering.

All in all, in their market, Meraki is a very affordable solution offering for enterprises that seek to spend on an OpEx model. Similar to their $500 APs, they just don't sell products aimed at homeowner at all. Strictly beeswax products marketed with cute videos. ;)
 

tangent

IPCT Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
4,342
Reaction score
3,524
20TB useable capacity from an enterprise storage vendor (like NetApp, Pure, or EMC) would be at a minimum $30k with 3 year support contract. Maybe $20k if you go NetApp E-Series and just get a dumb SAN array. Then you have to back that all up, so another $10k for a Barracuda appliance w/ cloud archive.
Let's assume you're already running a virtualized cluster and don't have to add a physical server, (which would be another $5-10k or so with support) you're still in that solution for way more than Meraki's offering.
That kind of storage is a bit overkill for most situations. 4x6TB WD Purples is a lot less than $20k.
 

hmjgriffon

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
980
Location
North Florida
Oh look my first topic on IPcamTalk that I actually know a little something about ;)

I just learned about Meraki last week at a Cisco event in AZ where I had dinner with their global business development manager. Meraki (which is now Cisco Miraki) cameras are better seen as a subscription model for surveillance costs then a camera purchase. Obviously a 720p h.264 dome cam with like 20m IR doesn't sound amazing at $1500. What they offer is essentially 3 years (I think) of fully "offloaded" management and storage (sort of) plus the camera provided at a rate of $1500 (outdoor model). A couple notes here, Cisco usually has 45-55% margin available just to the partner selling the solution on stuff like this, and this is not aimed at home/private users at all. Meraki targets education, manufacturing, and hospitality primarily where 1-5 IT guys are managing everything from AD, a thousand users, a network, etc, etc so a "plug-n-play" model for cameras can be really appealing, especially when the selling partner can really sell this stuff at $900 a cam or so on a big roll out. For an enterprise to deploy a 20 camera solution, complete with management and storage for about $25k every 3 years they are winning all day long when compared to other enterprise class solutions.

For comparison (granted, not apples to apples):
20 good IP cameras from someone like HikVison would run maybe $5-7k right? Double that if they go with someone higher tier like Vivotek. (you can't take Dahua into consideration here because from an enterprise standpoint they are brand new in the market here, all enterprises care about is support/reputation.
20TB useable capacity from an enterprise storage vendor (like NetApp, Pure, or EMC) would be at a minimum $30k with 3 year support contract. Maybe $20k if you go NetApp E-Series and just get a dumb SAN array. Then you have to back that all up, so another $10k for a Barracuda appliance w/ cloud archive.
Let's assume you're already running a virtualized cluster and don't have to add a physical server, (which would be another $5-10k or so with support) you're still in that solution for way more than Meraki's offering.

All in all, in their market, Meraki is a very affordable solution offering for enterprises that seek to spend on an OpEx model. Similar to their $500 APs, they just don't sell products aimed at homeowner at all. Strictly beeswax products marketed with cute videos. ;)
yeah, I sat through a ton of cisco classes in college and yada yada, it's a bunch of overpriced crap, them and all of the other big name companies. they sell mediocre products at insanely inflated prices and then compete with each other to see who can screw you a little less than the next guy. Then there whole licensing thing where they charge you a ton of money to sell you a code you pop into the command line and magically unlock a bunch of features that should have been available already. But like you said they are buying names and "reputation". This is why companies like netflix are absolutely kicking ass and making so much money they produce their own TVs shows for their service. They don't run overpriced cisco garbage and such though, they run FreeBSD to power their infrastructure with some linux mixed in. I decided not to drink the koolaid anymore after I got my CCNA, pleh.
 

hmjgriffon

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
980
Location
North Florida
That kind of storage is a bit overkill for most situations. 4x6TB WD Purples is a lot less than $20k.
yeah but that's not how stuff like that works, these enterprise companies want to sell you 2k worth of hardware for 50k and make a boat load of money after they convince you that you have to have it and you need to hire a few guys at 80k a year each to run it.
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,897
Reaction score
21,250
Oh look my first topic on IPcamTalk that I actually know a little something about ;)

I just learned about Meraki last week at a Cisco event in AZ where I had dinner with their global business development manager. Meraki (which is now Cisco Miraki) cameras are better seen as a subscription model for surveillance costs then a camera purchase. Obviously a 720p h.264 dome cam with like 20m IR doesn't sound amazing at $1500. What they offer is essentially 3 years (I think) of fully "offloaded" management and storage (sort of) plus the camera provided at a rate of $1500 (outdoor model). A couple notes here, Cisco usually has 45-55% margin available just to the partner selling the solution on stuff like this, and this is not aimed at home/private users at all. Meraki targets education, manufacturing, and hospitality primarily where 1-5 IT guys are managing everything from AD, a thousand users, a network, etc, etc so a "plug-n-play" model for cameras can be really appealing, especially when the selling partner can really sell this stuff at $900 a cam or so on a big roll out. For an enterprise to deploy a 20 camera solution, complete with management and storage for about $25k every 3 years they are winning all day long when compared to other enterprise class solutions.

For comparison (granted, not apples to apples):
20 good IP cameras from someone like HikVison would run maybe $5-7k right? Double that if they go with someone higher tier like Vivotek. (you can't take Dahua into consideration here because from an enterprise standpoint they are brand new in the market here, all enterprises care about is support/reputation.
20TB useable capacity from an enterprise storage vendor (like NetApp, Pure, or EMC) would be at a minimum $30k with 3 year support contract. Maybe $20k if you go NetApp E-Series and just get a dumb SAN array. Then you have to back that all up, so another $10k for a Barracuda appliance w/ cloud archive.
Let's assume you're already running a virtualized cluster and don't have to add a physical server, (which would be another $5-10k or so with support) you're still in that solution for way more than Meraki's offering.

All in all, in their market, Meraki is a very affordable solution offering for enterprises that seek to spend on an OpEx model. Similar to their $500 APs, they just don't sell products aimed at homeowner at all. Strictly beeswax products marketed with cute videos. ;)
Something is off...
MV Security Camera FAQ
There is no cloud storage just cloud management...you are limited to 128GB local storage per camera...
20 comparable cameras from hikvison would cost about 2-3k...
Everything about this setup is ridiculous...with that kind of money Enterprise should be using higher end solutions like avigilon and still save a ton over this stuff..
 

hmjgriffon

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
980
Location
North Florida
Something is off...
MV Security Camera FAQ
There is no cloud storage just cloud management...you are limited to 128GB local storage per camera...
20 comparable cameras from hikvison would cost about 2-3k...
Everything about this setup is ridiculous...with that kind of money Enterprise should be using higher end solutions like avigilon and still save a ton over this stuff..
But cisco, and people spent hundreds and thousands of dollars getting a bunch of nifty cisco certs lol.
 

thomaswde

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
44
Reaction score
62
Location
NW, GA
That kind of storage is a bit overkill for most situations. 4x6TB WD Purples is a lot less than $20k.
You are absolutely right, there are a ton of ways to get 20TB hella cheaper than $20k bucks. The idea they pitch and that almost all major IT orgs buy into is to buy a $10k piece of hardware and pay another $10k+ to have it be "support's problem" if something breaks. The hardware won't be 4 stand alone consumer disks with zero FT, it will be something like 14x 2TB Enterprise storage drives in a dynamic disc pool using striping, parity, and distributed hot spares, it will have dual dedicated power supplies, a couple Xeons, and a few dozen gigs of ram, all redundant. Overkill in consumer space for plain-ol-storage sure, but the idea these guys have is to keep their jobs and have 30 minutes or less downtime per year. Of course like hmjgriffon said, it's marked up to the moon and back by the OEM, then the distributor, then the channel partner who sells it, by the time everyone makes their 20-30 points on the deal it's 4-5x what it's actually worth. Such is enterprise IT.

yeah but that's not how stuff like that works, these enterprise companies want to sell you 2k worth of hardware for 50k and make a boat load of money after they convince you that you have to have it and you need to hire a few guys at 80k a year each to run it.
You're spot on. Often it's the IT guys making the 80k who order the $50k equipment :) So the cycle lives on.
 

hmjgriffon

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
3,401
Reaction score
980
Location
North Florida
You are absolutely right, there are a ton of ways to get 20TB hella cheaper than $20k bucks. The idea they pitch and that almost all major IT orgs buy into is to buy a $10k piece of hardware and pay another $10k+ to have it be "support's problem" if something breaks. The hardware won't be 4 stand alone consumer disks with zero FT, it will be something like 14x 2TB Enterprise storage drives in a dynamic disc pool using striping, parity, and distributed hot spares, it will have dual dedicated power supplies, a couple Xeons, and a few dozen gigs of ram, all redundant. Overkill in consumer space for plain-ol-storage sure, but the idea these guys have is to keep their jobs and have 30 minutes or less downtime per year. Of course like hmjgriffon said, it's marked up to the moon and back by the OEM, then the distributor, then the channel partner who sells it, by the time everyone makes their 20-30 points on the deal it's 4-5x what it's actually worth. Such is enterprise IT.


You're spot on. Often it's the IT guys making the 80k who order the $50k equipment :) So the cycle lives on.
Job security LOL.
 
Top