Clown tries to get into house at 2AM. (Not Mine)
- Thread starter hook3m
- Start date
nayr
IPCT Contributor
trick or treat..
my first guess: siblings pulling a prank and knows the house is loaded with cameras so he makes an appearance on all of em just to freak yeh the hell out.
my first guess: siblings pulling a prank and knows the house is loaded with cameras so he makes an appearance on all of em just to freak yeh the hell out.
Jack B Nimble
Pulling my weight
I agree the clown knows where all cameras are at so just a prank, one of those clowns is going to get killed one day.
They are attacking the U.K as well:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3829942/Why-creepy-crowns-suddenly-terrorising-Britain-children-chased-wield-knives-merely-passing-craze-Halloween-sinister.html
They are attacking the U.K as well:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3829942/Why-creepy-crowns-suddenly-terrorising-Britain-children-chased-wield-knives-merely-passing-craze-Halloween-sinister.html
zero-degrees
Known around here
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 1,350
- Reaction score
- 847
Quick and simple way to get yourself shot in todays world. Sadly some kid is going to lose his/her life playing what they think is a silly prank/game.
bigredfish
Known around here
I think it was clearly staged, however assuming it wasn't...
In Florida, had clownboy actually opened any of those doors and let himself inside, Statute 776.013 (our "enhanced Castle Doctrine Law" which provides "presumption"), would have been in effect.
776.013 (1), (a)
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html
Actually by the letter, just being "in the process of" [SIZE=-1]unlawfully and forcefully entering may have been enough, and while I wouldn't advise it nor want to be the guy testing it in court, entering that gate into that enclosed patio was likely enough to justify use of lethal force by the resident in Florida.[/SIZE]
In Florida, had clownboy actually opened any of those doors and let himself inside, Statute 776.013 (our "enhanced Castle Doctrine Law" which provides "presumption"), would have been in effect.
776.013 (1), (a)
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html
Actually by the letter, just being "in the process of" [SIZE=-1]unlawfully and forcefully entering may have been enough, and while I wouldn't advise it nor want to be the guy testing it in court, entering that gate into that enclosed patio was likely enough to justify use of lethal force by the resident in Florida.[/SIZE]
Last edited by a moderator:
Jack B Nimble
Pulling my weight
Another clown response, this is what I would do:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3832731/Killer-Clown-armed-baseball-bat-gets-HEADBUTTED-picking-wrong-victim-scare-multi-storey-car-park.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3832731/Killer-Clown-armed-baseball-bat-gets-HEADBUTTED-picking-wrong-victim-scare-multi-storey-car-park.html
We live in a rural area, most people in my neighborhood would have NO problem drawing down on him considering he/she has a weapon in hand. Not very smart in our current times prank or not.
Bradmph
Pulling my weight
Now if that was a rubber knife, oh that would be hilarious.....Dead men tell no tales. he be a corpse in my yard. LOL