What is most surprising to me is that the police actually proposed this argument in court.
Thankfully, the court didn't buy it. Also, an argument for having more than one kind of camera setup.
Court: Smashing Cameras Doesn’t Give You a “Reasonable Expectation of Privacy”
...although the court's argument is also kind of disappointing, saying the police should have known there might be a backup system, not directly saying you can't create legal privacy rights for yourself where you wouldn't otherwise have them, simply by destruction of property.
Thankfully, the court didn't buy it. Also, an argument for having more than one kind of camera setup.
Court: Smashing Cameras Doesn’t Give You a “Reasonable Expectation of Privacy”
...although the court's argument is also kind of disappointing, saying the police should have known there might be a backup system, not directly saying you can't create legal privacy rights for yourself where you wouldn't otherwise have them, simply by destruction of property.
Last edited: