jd415
Getting comfortable
Why use Avigilon or Axis when you could use Nest!
Mount Sinai hospital in New York City uses Nest cameras:
Mount Sinai hospital in New York City uses Nest cameras:
Hospital Uses Nest Cameras
- Thread starter jd415
- Start date
Mark_M
Getting comfortable
I saw this one on a Facebook group...... it doesn't look pretty.
This is just an opportunity waiting to happen for random voices to start speaking through the cameras.
This is just an opportunity waiting to happen for random voices to start speaking through the cameras.
catcamstar
Known around here
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2018
- Messages
- 1,659
- Reaction score
- 1,193
If this is in a psychiatric division of a hospital, that wouldn't bother anyone
"I see dead people" 
Sounds like a serious HIPAA violation in the works for that hospital.
According to The HIPAA Journal, out of the The Most Common HIPAA Violations You Should Be Aware Of, #2 on the list of 10 is "Failure to Perform an Organization-Wide Risk Analysis ". The article goes on to state ".... The failure to perform an organization-wide risk analysis is one of the most common HIPAA violations to result in a financial penalty. If the risk analysis is not performed regularly, organizations will not be able to determine whether any vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI exist. Risks are therefore likely to remain unaddressed, leaving the door wide open to hackers."
I doubt very much if there was an unbiased, third-party risk assessment done. Heavy, HEAVY fines could be levied against an already financially strapped hospital....but it's typical of many decisions made in a liberally-governed city and state. I'm sure the equally liberal-minded Google was very convincing, stating only the benefits but forgetting to mention the possible risks to confidentiality of PHI (Personal Health Information).
I would have thought someone in the hospital's IT department would have phoned-in an anonymous complaint to HIPAA. Maybe they did and everyone involved thought it was a great idea. I just cannot come to that same conclusion. We'll see later on though, won't we?
According to The HIPAA Journal, out of the The Most Common HIPAA Violations You Should Be Aware Of, #2 on the list of 10 is "Failure to Perform an Organization-Wide Risk Analysis ". The article goes on to state ".... The failure to perform an organization-wide risk analysis is one of the most common HIPAA violations to result in a financial penalty. If the risk analysis is not performed regularly, organizations will not be able to determine whether any vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI exist. Risks are therefore likely to remain unaddressed, leaving the door wide open to hackers."
I doubt very much if there was an unbiased, third-party risk assessment done. Heavy, HEAVY fines could be levied against an already financially strapped hospital....but it's typical of many decisions made in a liberally-governed city and state. I'm sure the equally liberal-minded Google was very convincing, stating only the benefits but forgetting to mention the possible risks to confidentiality of PHI (Personal Health Information).
I would have thought someone in the hospital's IT department would have phoned-in an anonymous complaint to HIPAA. Maybe they did and everyone involved thought it was a great idea. I just cannot come to that same conclusion. We'll see later on though, won't we?
Last edited:
That's somewhat terrifying, unless through some magic they are not recording anything to the cloud????
Ace844
Getting the hang of it
Large swaths of HIppa have been waived during the Pandemic by executive order both state and FED. Good luck finding someone to find a "care" about such violations today.
That's not good, IMO. I understand the need for expediency in a crisis but I don't see that need putting PHI at risk of compromise.
Not that I doubt what you stated, but do you have some links that expound / clarify some HIPAA regs waived?
Ace844
Getting the hang of it
For starters: 1068-Is the HIPAA Privacy Rule suspended during a national or public health emergency?
www.natlawreview.com
Relaxing Of HIPAA Laws During COVID-19 Pandemic
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the need for an informed and coordinated public health response, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Alex Azar has declared a limited waiver of the following provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Thanks for the response and the links.For starters: 1068-Is the HIPAA Privacy Rule suspended during a national or public health emergency?
Relaxing Of HIPAA Laws During COVID-19 Pandemic
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the need for an informed and coordinated public health response, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Alex Azar has declared a limited waiver of the following provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
This concerns me (from your link here):
"......Disclosures to the Media and Others
Covered entities, according to the rules, should not disclose specific information about the treatment (including, but not limited to, a patient’s test results and specific details of an individual’s condition or illness) of an identifiable patient to the media or other individuals not involved in the patient’s care without the written, HIPAA-compliant authorization of the patient or the patient’s representative, except in such specific circumstances:
- If a patient has not objected to or otherwise restricted the release of their own protected health information and the media or another individual or individuals request information about that particular patient by name, a covered entity may at their discretion acknowledge that the patient is receiving care in the facility, release limited facility directory information, and may provide information about the patient’s condition in broad and general terms such as “critical,” “stable,” “deceased,” or “treated and released.”
Ace844
Getting the hang of it
There are a lot of concerning items around these days if we care to look hard enough. However, in a mass disaster situation, these things typically take a back seat to the practice and application of medicine. If you you want to complain later and make noise, at least you're still breathing and healthy enough to do so. Good luck finding a jury of people and convincing them that generic normal day to day administrative rules take precedence over care in "extraordinary situations"
Right, wrong, or indifferent it's reality.
aristobrat
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2016
- Messages
- 2,983
- Reaction score
- 3,180
One article said the hospital worked directly with Google for this implementation, and another said the cameras streamed directly to a console in the hospital, so I'm guessing there's a chance it doesn't stream to the cloud. I'm also guessing that since it's an official press release on the hospital's website, there's a good chance the solution has been vetted by their security folks.
Oh, I agree and understand wholeheartedly. It's just that my trust list doesn't even have "The Media" down at the bottom, if you get my drift.
looney2ns
IPCT Contributor
@TonyR Nothing to be concerned about. What could possibly go wrong?
www.foxnews.com
Hackers double ransom demand to $42M from Lady Gaga, Madonna's attorney, threaten Donald Trump
The ransom demand for the secret files of a cyber-attacked lawyer to A-list stars has doubled to $42 million — as the hackers are now threatening to reveal “dirty laundry” on President Donald Trump in just a week if they are not paid in full.
www.foxnews.com