Local police department deploys security cam volunteer database

trauts14

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
252
Reaction score
30
Location
Central NC
Do any members live in an area where the PD or Sheriff's Office have a volunteer database of cam owners? A local department in my area just made a database where cam owners can submit their name and address. The idea is cam owners can provide footage for cops when a crime is committed in the area or the cam or nearby. If somebody has a cam(s) they can voluntarily submit the info, and voluntarily assist the cops if needed.
 

cainrand

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
112
Reaction score
20
Location
Grand Rapids, MN
Never heard of that but the police here have asked for footage from a couple of my cams, because they also see the road, in efforts to establish time lines when specific vehicles were passing through. One was for a murder, the other a string of burglaries in the area.
Small town here - police know where just about every cam is and will ask for information if they think it might be recorded.
 

Fastb

Known around here
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
934
Location
Seattle, Wa
Do you record audio?
If so, have the police ever discussed the laws re recording audio? (they're stricter than video)
 

trauts14

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
252
Reaction score
30
Location
Central NC
I have not volunteered for the project. Out of curiosity, how might audio recording laws effect people who have cams?





Do you record audio?
If so, have the police ever discussed the laws re recording audio? (they're stricter than video)
 

cainrand

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
112
Reaction score
20
Location
Grand Rapids, MN
I do not record audio.

I don't know the exact wording of the law but it is illegal to record conversations that you are not a part of. Likewise, it is illegal to record video of an area where people have an expectation of privacy.

edit: Actually, I should reword that, "it is basically illegal to install a camera in an area where there is an expectation of privacy"
 

whoslooking

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
1,524
Reaction score
548
Location
London
In the UK all commercial property by law have to register their CCTV installation so the Police or others can request a copy or if it incriminates the police try and force you do delete it before you post it online.

Domestic installs don't need to do this.
 

Kawboy12R

Known around here
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
1,771
Reaction score
609
We have a volunteer cam signup here. I haven't signed up (Big Brother reasons) but pay attention to local news and scan for anything interesting after big events anyway.
 

Baja

n3wb
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
27
Reaction score
24
Yes, here is a sample registration for those that are curious:

LVMPD > Community Programs > Vegas SafeCam > Register Your Camera

As for audio recording, it is legal in most places as long as there is not an expectation of privacy. E.g. Security cameras around your house are fine, but using an infrared laser mic pointed at a neighbors window to hear internal conversations would definitely be a violation of their privacy rights. The same is true of video. The Supreme Court used the same rationale to prohibit warrantless thermal camera scans by police looking for marijuana grow houses.
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,897
Reaction score
21,250
As for audio recording, it is legal in most places as long as there is not an expectation of privacy. E.g. Security cameras around your house are fine, but using an infrared laser mic pointed at a neighbors window to hear internal conversations would definitely be a violation of their privacy rights. The same is true of video. The Supreme Court used the same rationale to prohibit warrantless thermal camera scans by police looking for marijuana grow houses.
That is simply not correct...there are separate statues that govern audio recording..
 

Baja

n3wb
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
27
Reaction score
24
That is simply not correct...there are separate statues that govern audio recording..
True, but the key element is an expectation of privacy. People often misconstrue a two party audio statute to apply to residential camera systems. Trespassers on your property do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Cameras around your house are a far cry from hidden cameras or microphones in say a hotel room, airbnb rental or dressing room.

Take a look a this state by state breakdown of audio laws. Let me know if you see something that might be applicable to residential security systems and we can do a deeper dive by pulling the statute or case law.

http://www.rcfp.org/rcfp/orders/docs/RECORDING.pdf
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,897
Reaction score
21,250
True, but the key element is an expectation of privacy. People often misconstrue a two party audio statute to apply to residential camera systems. Trespassers on your property do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Cameras around your house are a far cry from hidden cameras or microphones in say a hotel room, airbnb rental or dressing room.

Take a look a this state by state breakdown of audio laws. Let me know if you see something that might be applicable to residential security systems and we can do a deeper dive by pulling the statute or case law.

http://www.rcfp.org/rcfp/orders/docs/RECORDING.pdf
There folks who come within range of your cameras that are not trespassers, including guests....or even a delivery person on a cell phone...once your record those audio of those folks you are in violation of the law..
 

Baja

n3wb
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
27
Reaction score
24
There folks who come within range of your cameras that are not trespassers, including guests....or even a delivery person on a cell phone...once your record those audio of those folks you are in violation of the law..
True, but we circle back to the key element. Does a delivery person, guest or anyone else talking loud enough to be heard from your home have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

The only cases I am familiar with involve police informants with recording devices, hidden spy cams/microphones and telephone wiretaps.

Can you point to a single conviction involving a residential security system? If yes, I would love to review the case.
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,897
Reaction score
21,250
True, but we circle back to the key element. Does a delivery person, guest or anyone else talking loud enough to be heard from your home have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

The only cases I am familiar with involve police informants with recording devices, hidden spy cams/microphones and telephone wiretaps.

Can you point to a single conviction involving a residential security system? If yes, I would love to review the case.
Yes he does...these camera mics are very sensitive...I'm not saying there have been convictions..my point is that it's unlawful and my affect your ability to use the footage for example on a civil suit without exposing yourself to the party filing a criminal complaint..
 

Fastb

Known around here
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
934
Location
Seattle, Wa
I have external powered mics, and I agree with Fenderman, the mics are very sensitive. I can hear what people are saying as they approach my walk and front door. I hear crickets, bird chirps, rain falling, etc.

I've taken the path of obtaining "implied consent", which is the legal requirement in my city. So I have a sign on the foot of my driveway that states audio and video recording is in place on my property. Anyone who proceeds past the sign has provided "implied consent".

When researching the situation, I found potential liability exists for me in both civil and criminal courts. Even if someone trespasses, they have "rights". Analogy: if someone climbs over my fence, climbs up a ladder I left leaning against the house, and then falls, I have liability exposure. Or if I set a bear trap in my garage to stop burglars, I have exposure.

I didn't find past legal judgements in my city that covered homeowner security audio recording. I'm not sure how common lawsuits or criminal charges really are, practically speaking. So a simple sign, planted right next to my alarm company's "This property is covered by xyz Alarm" sign, I figured I'm covered.

Lastly, the audio is recorded on my NVR. If I were to ever download footage to turn over to authorities, I'd strip the audio. Also, my NVR has the capacity to store 6 days of recordings. If a subpoena arrived, the footage would already be overwritten by then. Only my downloaded video-only recording would remain.

This thread raised the prospect of registering a homeowner's system with the police. I wondered if this would inadvertently let the police learn audio recording was in use, somehow. Would "registering" let the cat out of the bag, and result in "exposure"?

Audio might be helpful to solve a crime, even if that audio wasn't admissible in court. The police gather lots of info to solve crimes, and don't use all of it in court (eg: confidential informants). So maybe the police could view footage in my house, (audio & video), and maybe look the other way regarding audio recording, in the interest solving a more serious crime than improper recording. I'm describing "thin ice" for sure.

Bottom line: You can see why I asked about audio recording details in my reply to @cainrand and @Kawboy12R regarding a cam volunteer database.

Now that I've stirred the pot a bit more, I'll step back a few feet. I expect some to point out I mangled some of the finer legal distinctions...

Fastb
 
Last edited:
Top