US Elections (& Politics) :)

gwminor48

Known around here
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
6,898
Location
Texas
Closer than you think I think ;)

Ben Greenwald, a world class, yet very liberal reporter, nails it.
Greenwald: Democrats, Media Do Not Want To Weaken Facebook, Just Commandeer Its Power To Censor | ZeroHedge

This show trail "whistleblower" is advocating for MORE censorship not less. This is playing right into the Marxist playbook.

-----------------------------------

And that is Facebook's only real political problem: not that they are too powerful but that they are not using that power to censor enough content from the internet that offends the sensibilities and beliefs of Democratic Party leaders and their liberal followers, who now control the White House, the entire executive branch and both houses of Congress. Haugen herself, now guided by long-time Obama operative Bill Burton, has made explicitly clear that her grievance with her former employer is its refusal to censor more of what she regards as “hate, violence and misinformation.” In a 60 Minutes interview on Sunday night, Haugen summarized her complaint about CEO Mark Zuckerberg this way: he “has allowed choices to be made where the side effects of those choices are that hateful and polarizing content gets more distribution and more reach." Haugen, gushed The New York Times’ censorship-desperate tech unit as she testified on Tuesday, is “calling for regulation of the technology and business model that amplifies hate and she’s not shy about comparing Facebook to tobacco.”

Agitating for more online censorship has been a leading priority for the Democratic Party ever since they blamed social media platforms (along with WikiLeaks, Russia, Jill Stein, James Comey, The New York Times, and Bernie Bros) for the 2016 defeat of the rightful heir to the White House throne, Hillary Clinton. And this craving for censorship has been elevated into an even more urgent priority for their corporate media allies, due to the same belief that Facebook helped elect Trump but also because free speech on social media prevents them from maintaining a stranglehold on the flow of information by allowing ordinary, uncredentialed serfs to challenge, question and dispute their decrees or build a large audience that they cannot control. Destroying alternatives to their failing platforms is thus a means of self-preservation: realizing that they cannot convince audiences to trust their work or pay attention to it, they seek instead to create captive audiences by destroying or at least controlling any competitors to their pieties.

 

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,015
Reaction score
11,032
Location
USA
Big Brother is watching you, but on the contrary, aren’t we all watching them as well? :rofl:

 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,016
Reaction score
47,473
Location
Floriduh

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,580
Reaction score
70,736
Location
SE Michigan USA
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
14,736
Location
South Dakota
I know someone who would have been a good person to have on the bench-- a Dem with support of the GOP Senators of South Dakota--- but their nomination was mysteriously bumped.
This may be why--- and what a revealing article it is:

EDIT: More on that "Demand Justice" group....

 
Last edited:

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,580
Reaction score
70,736
Location
SE Michigan USA
Top