Recent content by adi78

Well, I think if I'm looking at the camera using internet browser it might be using RTP over HTTP. iVMS was set to use TCP but I just changed that today to UDP (I found some articles on internet claiming UDP is better for video) Thanks

I use Cisco SG300-52MP in a system with 48 LTS 4MP cameras (a little overkill because all cameras use average 160W and this $switch$ can deliver over 700W). Works OK but I noticed that once per 2-3 weeks it's causing all cameras to disappear from iVMS (failed to get a stream) and the only way...

I will on site tomorrow afternoon to continue replacing old cameras - I will post the real numbers from server console... What do you guys think about this idea: - use iVMS4200 from Hikvision and convert this server into "Media Storage Server" - set all 48 cameras to write directly into this...

I will try that too in a minute. At the moment I'm remoting and I noticed that 20% of CPU usage is consumed by TeamViewer - 78% by BI if I use Task Manager. BI is showing 99% so I assume it is using summary CPU usage of the system - not just BI usage.

@bp2008 Thanks for responding to my post. CPU on this server is actually Xeon E5-2690 V3 2.6GHz (on system properties page it is showing as 2.4GHz) I just changed all the camera's to use direct-to-disk writes as I'm writing here and I see no changes in CPU usage... 90-99% all the time

Nope - I run full, purchased version. I didn't play a lot with Blue Iris settings so it run pretty much on defaults. Where is that option to enable "direct to disk" writes ? I know that most Xeons does not support Quick Sync - this server was not built to be a NVR but it is powerful enough to...

Yesterday I tried Blue Iris with 21 cameras (4.1MP LTS, each streaming at 2688x1520P@20fps) on my Supermicro Server: X10DAC motherboard with dual socket LGA2011 v3. Single 12 core Xeon 2.4 GHz, 32GB RAM. CPU usage was at 90-99% most of the time. Few seconds video delay on live preview. I do...