I eventually asked it if it could identify AI from a sample of text... and it said almost certainly. When I suspect an AI cheater, I am going to give it a try. Right now-- I don't know if I could spot an AI paper generated by Grok-- it is Really good.I just got done chatting with chatgpt and it just regurgitated an article I had just read, so not very useful. Awhile back I asked MS copilot if a blue Lacey was an akc recognized breed and it proceeded to ask me if I had a blue lacey, was I thinking of getting a blue lacey, what kind of dogs I like.... If we had that conversation, it would have been a pleasant conversation. With AI it felt like an interrogation and all would've been catalogued and attached to my profile forever. Grok also looked like it was learning from you.
My GROK experiment continues-- I have been using GROK the way I normally use Google to find factual information about anything. It has been so good that now I am more inclined to use GROK than google for purely factual info. The awesome part is that GROK is transparent, providing links to websites and X resources that helped it organize a response to my question. I used to catch GPT in lies all the time. I have yet to catch GROK feeding me bad information.
Nope. I ask it mostly for factual information that I might normally google. Opinions are going to be tainted by the Garbage IN of the internet.Have you asked it the status of Taiwan yet?
Or to explain black power and then white power?