Search results

I have 4 of them. They work. Anything specific you want to know? Some generic notes: They are onvif compliant but don't expose all the capabilities. I think just the stream but not the sensor. Has an open api, can be integrated with things like Home Assistant for light control. Their app...

Does anybody know if the docker GPU tags have changed or are they just delaying updating it? Currently I use the tag GPU to install the GPU version of the docker but that hasn't been updated in 4 months. The documentation still says to use this. I see that there are a bunch of other GPU tags...

Just got the updated docker version this morning. At first I had a few issues but after deleting the old "extra" parameters in the docker and resetting the config folder, it is working perfectly. I get between 30-40ms now (down from 50ms) using YOLO so its getting faster.

Just upgraded to test. No issues here. Maybe just double checked the network settings. Ensure its binded to the right adapter etc.

I have noticed this too and this is why I've been using it now as my primary tool. I just noticed that one of the issues I pointed out with environment variables in linux dockers for disabling modules has been mentioned in the document as being fixed in 1.5.7 (when its released). It was great...

Whenever you want to pass throught he vidio card to the docker you need to add the following variables and extra parameter. NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES = all NVIDIA_VISIBLE_DEVICES = your gpu id like "GPU-abcdefg-abcd-abcd-abcd-abcdefghijk" and add "--runtime=nvidia" under extra parameters in...

For the group as well. I am using the same sample file (pexels-maria-orlova-4947381.jpg). I have it running in an unraid docker that has 7 cores (shared with other dockers) assigned. My GPU is a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB and can see that the docker is using about 3.5GB of memory. 197.6...

I have the same card. Looking to upgrade it though because of the memory. I'm eyeing a 6GB card now. With the older version of deepstack every custom model used ~900MiB of memory. With the latest version of deepstack I noticed it was bumped up to 1400MiB, so I started having problems when...

Happened to one of my cameras. I fixed it by going into the foscam NVR software and then the settings for the camera. Under video -> video adjustments, it hit Default and then save. It reset whatever broke and the video was back to normal. I have 4 of these, but it only happened to 1...

I've seen all these problems trying to get the latest version of deepstack working. Its obviously something specific to our setups causing these problems as others seem to be working. I've seen the "no object detected" error as well as the "timeout" error. With the latest version I noticed...

That sucks. I really hope they figure it out. The whole zwave 700 has been such a mess since its release. I've seen reports from people with issues with just a couple devices. I took me a long time to get my network to run reliable and even still something like a zooz vibration sensor can...

The issue with the 700 series controllers has been finally acknowleged by SiLabs as a bug. The community has been trying to convince them since last year there were issues with it going offline under heavy loads. They released two update to the zwave sticks in January. 7.17.1 was the first...

I noticed that too. It was changed in the latest ios update. I just got used to using that too and it changed.

I know a couple months late.. but I don't think the PIR can trigger anything. I've been trying to figure that out as well. Even when I turn on the PIR setting though it just triggers too much. Its way to sensitive for some reason. I even tried mixing it up with Onvif detection but its not...

Correct. And even more confusing is that the role can jump around based on which of the cameras connected first I guess. As a user, I was just editing the copy and expecting it to work. As a quick fix maybe a note that the setting needs to be applied to all copies for it to work reliably...

You are correct sir. So after changing it to not run as a service it started working on the camera I was testing with but then I noticed the others didn't work still (I have 4 of them). So it led me down the rabbit hole a bit further. On my setup I have the cameras all setup to do continuous...

BAM. That was it. I run it as a service. Once I changed that to not run as a service the calls worked for the presets. Its strange that web requests work on other parts, just not this one as a swervice. Thank you @wittaj for that. I usually search the manual first but missed that in my...

Call will send the request to the camera and skip the web request. So something is up. I’m going to send support a email and also try to downgrade and see if it works. But thanks for confirming for me. Getting this to work will be a nice work around to controlling other features on a camera...

Ya. It doesn't make sense. I was going to downgrade my BI to test, I only see 5.5.3.5 not 5.5.2.5. But its worth a test as well. Here are some screenshots of my preset as well. Maybe its something setup differently. If i manually run it from the action set command (the lightning bolt) it...

Thanks for checking. That is my problem. My web requests do work when I manually trigger it from the on call settings. I also have a bunch of web requests throughout BI that link it back to my Hubitat hub for automation and they all work. However, if from the BI interface I select the Preset...

Just wondering if this is possible. I want to map the ptz presets to call HTTP URL's instead to trigger things such as the light built into the Foscam floodlight cam. The cam obviously isn't a ptz but I figured I can utilize the preset and have 1 turn it on and 2 turn it off by calling a url...