Axis Q6315-LE PTZ and D2110-VE Radar Unit Sample Videos

Sep 5, 2015
756
604
Last month I purchased an Axis Q6315-LE and Axis D2110-VE Radar Unit to test. The Q6315-LE has been on the market for approximately 4 years and has firmware support until 12-31-2033. This past week, Axis announced the replacement for the Q6315-LE which is the Q6355-LE. The Q6355-LE will have the newest ARTPEC-9 SoC and be available Q2 2025. The MSRP for the Q6315-LE is $3,249.

I'm running my exposure at 1/100 and I set the bitrate to "Maximum". Maximum bitrate is variable bitrate but you can set a max. My max is set to 10 Mbit/s

Q6315-LE Datasheet-

The D2110-VE radar provides 180 degrees of detection and is also a little older and is running the ARTPEC-7 chipset. It can detect people up to 200 feet and vehicles up to 280 feet away. It's been on the market for about 5 to 6 years and has an MSRP of $1,699.00. The D2210-VE is a newer radar with ARTPEC-8 and has an MSRP of $1,199 but it only has detection area of 95 degrees.

D2110-VE datasheet-

Pro's (In addition to the standard Pro's with Axis);
2MP with a 1/2 image sensor
Laser Focus w/quick zoom (I'm impressed with how fast the camera can focus. Full zoom focused within 1 second)
Edge to Edge pairing with a radar unit
Radar based autotracking

Con's;
ARTPEC-7 chipset which has machine learning AI instead of Deep learning AI, (ARTPEC-9 is latest) and also does not support signed video.
The built-in software autotracking, "Autotracking 2" is motion based and not AI based. Which is the worst autotracking I've used within the past 5 to 7 years. I hate the built in autotracking on this camera and you can't select what you want to track. It just tracks any motion. Do not buy this camera if you intend to use the software based autotracking. I'm hoping the Q6355-LE has AI based autotracking.
At the default settings, the night image is slightly nosier than I expected with a 1/2 image sensor when the camera is fully zoomed out and the person is moving. The person was still clearly identifiable though and the noise mostly goes away when the camera zooms in. I was able to overcome this by reducing the gain, changing the noise/motion blur sider to less noise and moving the slider for the aperture to "open".


Radar Autotracking;

There's two main ways to pair the radar unit with the PTZ. The first way is Edge-to-Edge. The radar unit will connect directly with the PTZ by inputting the IP address, user and pass of the PTZ. This method will only work with one radar unit paired with one PTZ camera. This setup is simple and provides less configurability. For example, the Radar needs to be installed in the same spot as the PTZ because the calibration is very limited. You also don't get to set schedules or set the PTZ to track based on a scenario. The radar will just instruct the PTZ to track anything it detects unless you create an exclusion zone within the radar.

The second method is to download and install the Axis Radar Autotracking service onto the VMS server or a windows computer. This method allows multiple radars/PTZ's to be paired and has a more advanced calibration method. You can also create groups within the software to separate paired radars and PTZ's (Ex. Front of building and back of building) I had to use this method as my radar unit was installed approximately 25 to 30 feet to the right of the PTZ and it was not in alignment with it.

For demo purposes, I installed my radar unit on my porch in an area which is within a few feet of my truck. This is against the installation instructions because an object near my vehicle will reflect the radar and cause a ghost signal. The radar units need an open area to properly function, metal and marble objects within close proximity to the unit will cause reflections and degrade the ability for the PTZ to autotrack. You'll see the ghost signal in my demonstration video but it's very minimal in affecting the tracking. The best spot for the radar would actually be by the PTZ since it has an unobstructed view of the yard. It just wasn't practical to get it there at the moment. Also note, the front porch is physically behind the radar unit, so when the person walks up my steps, they're outside of the detection area of the radar unit. In addition, the radar will only track once a person/vehicle enters my yard. It won't track anything in the street as that's how I configured it. The person/vehicle does not need to be within the field of view of the PTZ, as long as the radar detects it, the PTZ will rotate and start tracking the object. I intend to move the radar unit to the other side of my yard and will post updated autotracking examples when I do.


Day Autotracking Videos;

Tracking running person-


Tracking walking person-


Night Autotracking Videos;

Note- The radar reflections are really apparent in this video due to the second vehicle pulling directly in front of my truck. The degraded performance is due to my improper installation, not the unit. The day/night autotracking is the same as it relies on the radar signal, so its not affected by lighting conditions.

Tracking Vehicle/person-


Same video with radar map-


Night Laser Focus/Quick Zoom-


Night forced color laser focus/quick zoom-



I attached screenshots of the settings for the Radar Autotracking service.

EDITED 4/6/25 to update exposure settings, include screenshots of camera settings and include screen recording of ACS Pro Mobile app PTZ controls.

I made a screen recording of the PTZ controls on my iPhone using the Axis Camera Station Pro mobile app. These are the best PTZ controls I've used on a mobile app, it's very easy to use and to follow a moving target. To zoom in, you use two fingers and spread them apart like you're zooming in on a webpage. The wider your fingers are apart, the more it'll zoom in. You can also move your fingers across the screen while holding them and align the center dot with the object you're trying to zoom in on. To move the PTZ without zooming in, you just tap your finger on the spot you want it to move it. My only complaint with the ACS Pro mobile app is it's limited search functionality. At this time, it does not support Smart Search 2 or free text search.
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    268.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    35.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    48.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103018.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103018.png
    78.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103101.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103101.png
    61.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103123.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103123.png
    50.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103201.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103201.png
    63.9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing these.

I know they are just first looks and you haven't completely dialed them in, but it appears to do better at night than during the day. The plate not being a complete white washout is impressive.

Which for most of us is fine as night time is when we want them to perform.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smiticans
Thanks for sharing these.

I know they are just first looks and you haven't completely dialed them in, but it appears to do better at night than during the day. The plate not being a complete white washout is impressive.

Which for most of us is fine as night time is when we want them to perform.
As for doing better at night vs day, are you referring to the pixelation while its actively tracking? That may be because of my bitrate limit. I just upped the max to 15 Mbit/s so we'll see if that changes anything tomorrow. The current bitrate the camera is using is displayed on the bottom right corner of the video. It's in Mbit/s.

Here's another daytime video that has periods with less tracking.

 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
Thats a sweet setup. Shame the "Autotracking 2" sucks since I haven't put up my Q6135-LE yet.

I still encourage you to try it, as you may have better results than I did. But regardless, it's not AI based so that's a huge disappointment. I'm going to be mad if the new generation of Q63's don't have AI autotracking.

I'm also curious to see how well the Q6135-LE focuses day and night since it doesn't have the laser assistance.

How long ago did you purchase the Q61?
 
I still encourage you to try it, as you may have better results than I did. But regardless, it's not AI based so that's a huge disappointment. I'm going to be mad if the new generation of Q63's don't have AI autotracking.

I'm also curious to see how well the Q6135-LE focuses day and night since it doesn't have the laser assistance.

How long ago did you purchase the Q61?
I bought it a couple months ago off FB marketplace with a wall mount for $200. The safety cable hanger part is busted but everything is good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smiticans
Last month I purchased an Axis Q6315-LE and Axis D2110-VE Radar Unit to test. The Q6315-LE has been on the market for approximately 4 years and has firmware support until 12-31-2033. This past week, Axis announced the replacement for the Q6315-LE which is the Q6355-LE. The Q6355-LE will have the newest ARTPEC-9 SoC and be available Q2 2025. The MSRP for the Q6315-LE is $3,249.

Con's;
ARTPEC-7 chipset which has machine learning AI instead of Deep learning AI, (ARTPEC-9 is latest) and also does not support signed video.
The built-in software autotracking, "Autotracking 2" is motion based and not AI based. Which is the worst autotracking I've used within the past 5 to 7 years. I hate the built in autotracking on this camera and you can't select what you

this is my one of the problems with Axis...
they have tons of models on previous tech (even 2 generations back of SOC) and they very slowly replace them to something never...

they release new ARTPEC SOCs generations every 3 years (+/- 1 year)..
having cams on 6 years old SOC (2 generations back) which don't have proper AI is little crazy..

especially when you can buy cams with proper AI 10x cheaper on the market - not even today but 2-3 years ago...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
The WDR on that PTZ is doing an incredible job to show the plate & headlights at the same time.

1743946414720.png

Including at this point:
1743946463096.png
 
this is my one of the problems with Axis...
they have tons of models on previous tech (even 2 generations back of SOC) and they very slowly replace them to something never...

they release new ARTPEC SOCs generations every 3 years (+/- 1 year)..
having cams on 6 years old SOC (2 generations back) which don't have proper AI is little crazy..

especially when you can buy cams with proper AI 10x cheaper on the market - not even today but 2-3 years ago...

I agree, everything has pro's and con's. It seems the average product lifecycle is about 4 years before a new generation is released but the product is generally supported with updated firmware for about 10 years after release. I'm going to make an assumption that if they cycled products every 1 to 2 years, it would be a tremendous workload to offer extended firmware support like they currently do (each model has its own firmware file). I'd rather have long term support with better, stable firmware than a new product every year or two (as long as the current product is good). This is also important depending where the camera is being installed (critical infrastructure, power plant, airport, etc.) as they have strict Cyber Security requirements.

ARTPEC-9 was just released about 4 months ago, so up until recently it was only 1 generation behind. Even with it being on ARTPEC-7, the Axis Object Analytics (AI) line crossing, person in area etc. still functions fine. My only complaint with this camera at the moment, is the motion based autotracking. In my opinion, the ARTPEC-7 SoC should have no problem handling AI autotracking as all of the other AI functions well. The motion based autotracking is just aggravating to me and I don't know why they thought that was a good idea.
 
The WDR on that PTZ is doing an incredible job to show the plate & headlights at the same time.

View attachment 218569

Including at this point:
View attachment 218570

The WDR is actually off. It was off by default and so far I haven't seen a need to turn it on. I attached screenshots of my current settings. Looks like I forgot my exposure was set to 1/100 and not 1/60. I'll have to update my original post.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103018.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103018.png
    78.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103101.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103101.png
    61.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103123.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103123.png
    50.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-04-06 103201.png
    Screenshot 2025-04-06 103201.png
    63.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
I made a screen recording of the PTZ controls on my iPhone using the Axis Camera Station Pro mobile app. These are the best PTZ controls I've used on a mobile app, it's very easy to use and to follow a moving target. To zoom in, you use two fingers and spread them apart like you're zooming in on a webpage. The wider your fingers are apart, the more it'll zoom in. You can also move your fingers across the screen while holding them and align the center dot with the object you're trying to zoom in on. To move the PTZ without zooming in, you just tap your finger on the spot you want it to move it. My only complaint with the ACS Pro mobile app is it's limited search functionality. At this time, it does not support Smart Search 2 or free text search.



I'll also update the original post to include this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
Most impressed with how quickly and accurately it focuses, along with its awesome exposure control. Guessing thats why you can read the plates and the headlights dont drown it out
 
Mostly we're talking nighttime. In daytime most have no problem focusing quickly. And all of mine are wayyyyy better in IR

I think a lot of it depends on the ambient light and shutter, as well as the strength of the IR.
AND speed/movement of the target
So many factors...

Here's a relatively cheap (By PTZ standards) $400 Mini PTZ


View attachment Home_ch7_20240126225758_20240126225820.mp4


And here's an older clip from my SD6 series 4MP , 1/1.8" in color at night - About $1600?

View attachment HOA Entr_ch1_20220207234603_20220207234658.mp4
 
I can't blame anyone for not wanting to spend the money on this PTZ/Radar combo. It's a very large cost for use in a residential setting. If I had to pay MSRP, I wouldn't have purchased it. (I'm an authorized partner and can purchase demo units at a discounted rate). Now if this PTZ had really good AI autotracking, than I would consider it for MSRP. But considering the replacement model for this PTZ (Q6355-LE) is a month or two away, I would tell anyone looking to buy this to hold off for the new unit, considering the new unit will have better AI and SoC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marq and bigredfish
You got the whole thing for $200? That's a steal haha, now you just need a radar unit
now thats a pipe dream . The guy that sold it to me is a retired FBI/LE and sold me two sightlogix thermal cams for $50 each. I'm planning on attaching it to a q6000-e-mkii and I'm just waiting for that kit to arrive. I do like that you can get spare parts somewhat easily as I got spare lens from B&H just in case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smiticans