My front entrance provides a perfect pinch point to get video of everyone who enters and exists the property. The entrance from the street is via an iron gate (currently uncontrolled but I will be installing an electric lock to be controlled by a VTO2211G-WP in the near future). The distance between said gate and front door is about 10m with 5 stairs at about the halfway point. This is really ideal to install a camera low, ideally camoflagued or hidden, to be able to face capture everyone who comes and goes.
So I decided to use the BoobieCam (Dahua IPC-HDBW5441F-AS-E2) which has two independent sensors in one cam with a normal footprint. The lenses can each be adjusted to almost any position the user requires. @looney2ns did an excellent review here.
The cam comes with either 2.8mm or 3.6mm focal length lenses. Since I am only really interested in small regions on each channel, I used the JVSG Lens Calculator to calculate the focal length for my needs. I ran through the calculations here and came out with 8mm for the gate side (being a bit farther than than the front door) and 6mm for the front door side.
I bought a refurbed BoobieCam off of @EMPIRETECANDY for the very low price of $95. Camera arrived in great condition and shipping was fast. First time being a refurb cam off of Andy and I can't be happier with his service and the condition of the camera.
The lenses were ordered off of Amazon and I went to work swapping them out. The first channel was easy. The sphere which holds the lens and sensor came apart easily and I was able to unscrew the factory lens and install the 6mm lens. Couldn't have been easier.
The sphere for the second channel was a bit more challenging. None of the three screws that hold the sphere together would budge. Having tried all my tricks (a bit of oil, duct tape to try and get a better grip, etc) I finally ended up drilling out the heads of the screws. This was a bit harrowing as I was worried about damaging the camera but all went well and I was able to swap out the lens on the second channel. To hold the sphere together without the screws, I used a two-part adhesive putty. This putty dries quickly and takes only a few hours to cure completely. I use it to install shower gel dispensers to shower tile where it constantly gets wet. It's great stuff and easy to work with.
When time came to mount it, I took down a camera which was mounted far too high (5m above the floor). Installed a keystone (female RJ45) connector and connected that to the existing cable and ran the new cable through flexible conduit and down to where the camera would be mounted. Installed a waterproof junction box and mounted the camera below that. Everything is installed above the footing of a column at a height of just over 1m. For getting faces of people looking downward coming out of the house, this height is really ideal.
I set the cam to the following on the camera GUI:
h.264H
8192 kbps
5 fps (this cam is underpowered for two channels and I had to drop from 15fps to 5fps to get both channels to detect correctly)
5 i-frame
Camera without cover. You can see the putty used to reassemble the sphere of the second channel.

Waterproof junction box and camera installed without cover.

And with the cover.

After focusing the lenses with the cover off and orienting them to get the desire coverage, we were off to the races! Or so I thought. Unfortunately, the longer focal length lenses seem to bring out more distortion caused by the glass domes. Others have mentioned slight image distortion issues with the factory lenses but the distortion was much more pronounced.
Door channel

Gate channel

Initially, I thought the lenses had been brought out of focus when the cover was installed. But after cleaning the glass domes and looking at the images, I could see that parts of the images were in focus and others slightly out of focus. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an easy solution to this with the non-factory lenses. So we left things for a few days to see how images would come out.
So far, so good. Yesterday was the first full weekday with the camera installed and the channel facing the street produced 2135 face captures. Some of these are of the same person but I when I fine tune the face detection settings I will be able to reduce this, if I desire. Currently, the sensitivity to face captures is set as low as it will go and the time between detection is zero, or almost zero, which produces the duplicates. But storage is cheap and having more than one shot to identify someone can't be a bad thing.
To give you an idea, here's a capture of someone clear across the street, a distance of about 18m.
![34[M][0@0][15813][4].jpg 34[M][0@0][15813][4].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166912-ebb7287c72c2663921cfe62a6b0c8de1.jpg?hash=67cofHLCZj)
![34[M][0@0][15813][3].jpg 34[M][0@0][15813][3].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166913-0ba5244d663af2d3f2e6efb4b394b57f.jpg?hash=C6UkTWY68t)
And someone walking right by on the sidewalk.
![00[M][0@0][15880][68].jpg 00[M][0@0][15880][68].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166914-0f4fb4b7fd0d9ad1ec332d81ba2bc168.jpg?hash=D0-0t_0Nmt)
![00[M][0@0][15880][67].jpg 00[M][0@0][15880][67].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166915-781fcee00e22fbf3897a430ed82a42ca.jpg?hash=eB_O4A4i-_)
So the target distance which is really 5.5m (distance to the gate) is easily covered. The people on the sidewalk just outside the gate are about 6m away from the cam and I feel this is absolutely an identify quality image. The individual across the street is also easily recognizable, perhaps even identifiable, which I'm more than happy with.
The cop who was by today for another issue was very impressed with the results and said he's looking forward to having this resource available to him. It caught someone running with the knife early Saturday morning. The individual was in mid-stride at just after 2am. The photo is definitely identify quality but I can't share it here.
In closing, despite some distortion issues, which were brought on by me modifying the camera, I'm very happy with this project. The cam is picking up people on bicycles, motorcycles and the odd car passenger. The cam often picks up a face the first frame the person is in the image and it starts capturing. As mentioned, I had to drop the fps to 5 to be able to achieve this but it's hardly a trade-off considering I'm only interested in face detection. I have cameras covering the entire street and this cam was an addition to the system to be able to pick up faces of people coming and going. Getting approximately 90% of the people who pass by is just an added bonus.
One must be aware of the shortcomings of this camera:
1) Cam is under-powered for two channels. Setting the fps to the standard 15 may mean that some events (IVS, face detection, etc) may be missed, particularly on the second channel.
2) Turning the lenses too far out may result in some distortion. This could be overcome by setting the camera further back, if possible, which would mean the lenses are turned a bit further in.
3) Replacing the factory lenses may result in increased image distortion. This isn't so much a shortcoming of the camera but one should be aware of it.
4) The camera GUI requires a plug-in. While we won't get into the politics of this, be aware that one must be running Internet Explorer and be prepared to install a plug-in. I was able to setup the camera by using Firefox (without the plugin) while sitting in front of the TV which is hooked up to the NVR. Dialing in the settings was just as easy as ever. But be aware that I didn't need to draw any IVS lines which would be impossible to do with the camera GUI if one isn't able to install the plugin.
Pros:
1) Excellent face detection capabilities. I estimate we're getting 90% of the people who walk by right to left and 75% of people who walk by left to right on the second channel. For sure, this will be handy when an incident occurs.
2) Small footprint. Having essentially two cams in the footprint of one is ideal.
3) Excellent mic. Didn't buy this for the mic but it is almost as good as the mic on my Color4K/X. Those with a Color4K/X will appreciate what I'm saying.
I would recommend this cam (Andy has a few available as refurbs right now) to someone wanting to do the same. Since installing Friday, the cam has not dropped off nor required any intervention. Still, I may try a factory lens to confirm whether or not the longer focal length lenses are what's causing the distortion. But considering the quality of face captures the camera is producing, I may just leave it.
Hope this helps someone who would considering using this camera for a similar project. A couple issues to be aware of but I'm very happy considering I paid $95 for what's basically a brand-new cam that retails for double what I paid.
So I decided to use the BoobieCam (Dahua IPC-HDBW5441F-AS-E2) which has two independent sensors in one cam with a normal footprint. The lenses can each be adjusted to almost any position the user requires. @looney2ns did an excellent review here.
The cam comes with either 2.8mm or 3.6mm focal length lenses. Since I am only really interested in small regions on each channel, I used the JVSG Lens Calculator to calculate the focal length for my needs. I ran through the calculations here and came out with 8mm for the gate side (being a bit farther than than the front door) and 6mm for the front door side.
I bought a refurbed BoobieCam off of @EMPIRETECANDY for the very low price of $95. Camera arrived in great condition and shipping was fast. First time being a refurb cam off of Andy and I can't be happier with his service and the condition of the camera.
The lenses were ordered off of Amazon and I went to work swapping them out. The first channel was easy. The sphere which holds the lens and sensor came apart easily and I was able to unscrew the factory lens and install the 6mm lens. Couldn't have been easier.
The sphere for the second channel was a bit more challenging. None of the three screws that hold the sphere together would budge. Having tried all my tricks (a bit of oil, duct tape to try and get a better grip, etc) I finally ended up drilling out the heads of the screws. This was a bit harrowing as I was worried about damaging the camera but all went well and I was able to swap out the lens on the second channel. To hold the sphere together without the screws, I used a two-part adhesive putty. This putty dries quickly and takes only a few hours to cure completely. I use it to install shower gel dispensers to shower tile where it constantly gets wet. It's great stuff and easy to work with.
When time came to mount it, I took down a camera which was mounted far too high (5m above the floor). Installed a keystone (female RJ45) connector and connected that to the existing cable and ran the new cable through flexible conduit and down to where the camera would be mounted. Installed a waterproof junction box and mounted the camera below that. Everything is installed above the footing of a column at a height of just over 1m. For getting faces of people looking downward coming out of the house, this height is really ideal.
I set the cam to the following on the camera GUI:
h.264H
8192 kbps
5 fps (this cam is underpowered for two channels and I had to drop from 15fps to 5fps to get both channels to detect correctly)
5 i-frame
Camera without cover. You can see the putty used to reassemble the sphere of the second channel.

Waterproof junction box and camera installed without cover.

And with the cover.

After focusing the lenses with the cover off and orienting them to get the desire coverage, we were off to the races! Or so I thought. Unfortunately, the longer focal length lenses seem to bring out more distortion caused by the glass domes. Others have mentioned slight image distortion issues with the factory lenses but the distortion was much more pronounced.
Door channel

Gate channel

Initially, I thought the lenses had been brought out of focus when the cover was installed. But after cleaning the glass domes and looking at the images, I could see that parts of the images were in focus and others slightly out of focus. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an easy solution to this with the non-factory lenses. So we left things for a few days to see how images would come out.
So far, so good. Yesterday was the first full weekday with the camera installed and the channel facing the street produced 2135 face captures. Some of these are of the same person but I when I fine tune the face detection settings I will be able to reduce this, if I desire. Currently, the sensitivity to face captures is set as low as it will go and the time between detection is zero, or almost zero, which produces the duplicates. But storage is cheap and having more than one shot to identify someone can't be a bad thing.
To give you an idea, here's a capture of someone clear across the street, a distance of about 18m.
![34[M][0@0][15813][4].jpg 34[M][0@0][15813][4].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166912-ebb7287c72c2663921cfe62a6b0c8de1.jpg?hash=67cofHLCZj)
![34[M][0@0][15813][3].jpg 34[M][0@0][15813][3].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166913-0ba5244d663af2d3f2e6efb4b394b57f.jpg?hash=C6UkTWY68t)
And someone walking right by on the sidewalk.
![00[M][0@0][15880][68].jpg 00[M][0@0][15880][68].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166914-0f4fb4b7fd0d9ad1ec332d81ba2bc168.jpg?hash=D0-0t_0Nmt)
![00[M][0@0][15880][67].jpg 00[M][0@0][15880][67].jpg](https://ipcamtalk.com/data/attachments/166/166915-781fcee00e22fbf3897a430ed82a42ca.jpg?hash=eB_O4A4i-_)
So the target distance which is really 5.5m (distance to the gate) is easily covered. The people on the sidewalk just outside the gate are about 6m away from the cam and I feel this is absolutely an identify quality image. The individual across the street is also easily recognizable, perhaps even identifiable, which I'm more than happy with.
The cop who was by today for another issue was very impressed with the results and said he's looking forward to having this resource available to him. It caught someone running with the knife early Saturday morning. The individual was in mid-stride at just after 2am. The photo is definitely identify quality but I can't share it here.
In closing, despite some distortion issues, which were brought on by me modifying the camera, I'm very happy with this project. The cam is picking up people on bicycles, motorcycles and the odd car passenger. The cam often picks up a face the first frame the person is in the image and it starts capturing. As mentioned, I had to drop the fps to 5 to be able to achieve this but it's hardly a trade-off considering I'm only interested in face detection. I have cameras covering the entire street and this cam was an addition to the system to be able to pick up faces of people coming and going. Getting approximately 90% of the people who pass by is just an added bonus.
One must be aware of the shortcomings of this camera:
1) Cam is under-powered for two channels. Setting the fps to the standard 15 may mean that some events (IVS, face detection, etc) may be missed, particularly on the second channel.
2) Turning the lenses too far out may result in some distortion. This could be overcome by setting the camera further back, if possible, which would mean the lenses are turned a bit further in.
3) Replacing the factory lenses may result in increased image distortion. This isn't so much a shortcoming of the camera but one should be aware of it.
4) The camera GUI requires a plug-in. While we won't get into the politics of this, be aware that one must be running Internet Explorer and be prepared to install a plug-in. I was able to setup the camera by using Firefox (without the plugin) while sitting in front of the TV which is hooked up to the NVR. Dialing in the settings was just as easy as ever. But be aware that I didn't need to draw any IVS lines which would be impossible to do with the camera GUI if one isn't able to install the plugin.
Pros:
1) Excellent face detection capabilities. I estimate we're getting 90% of the people who walk by right to left and 75% of people who walk by left to right on the second channel. For sure, this will be handy when an incident occurs.
2) Small footprint. Having essentially two cams in the footprint of one is ideal.
3) Excellent mic. Didn't buy this for the mic but it is almost as good as the mic on my Color4K/X. Those with a Color4K/X will appreciate what I'm saying.
I would recommend this cam (Andy has a few available as refurbs right now) to someone wanting to do the same. Since installing Friday, the cam has not dropped off nor required any intervention. Still, I may try a factory lens to confirm whether or not the longer focal length lenses are what's causing the distortion. But considering the quality of face captures the camera is producing, I may just leave it.
Hope this helps someone who would considering using this camera for a similar project. A couple issues to be aware of but I'm very happy considering I paid $95 for what's basically a brand-new cam that retails for double what I paid.