I have a question about the advantage of Blue Iris in my scenario of cameras use.
Mu current scenario
At the moment I have 4 Dahua 4MP camera's (and an expansion with two more are planned. My setup will never grow beyond 8 camera's).
I don't have Blue Iris yet.
At the moment I have configured all camera's through the firmware settings to ftp-upload videos/snapshots on motion-trigger (for certain zones) to my machine (Dell Optiplex i5-2500, 8GB ram, 2TB storage).
After some tinkering with the threshold and sensitivity this seems to be working (though with some false alarms due to shadows and lighting).
I'm using free TinyCam (though VPN) to watch videos live on my Android phone. I also have a webserver on my machine that can serve and playback the ftp-uploaded files (still a W.I.P.).
I always thought Blue Iris was essential for my setup, but I'm in doubt now as it seems the firmware capabilities are much more advanced than I thought.
Therefore I'd like to ask the following:
Questions
1. Is Blue iris recommended if I want to record video on motion (much like I do now with the the current firmware method)? What are the advantages over the firmware method?
2. Is Blue Iris recommended if I want to record video 24/7 for 6 camera's (and also record videos on motion triggers)? Or can I use the firmware of the camera's to record 24/7 streams (of the 6 cams) to my machine?
Mu current scenario
At the moment I have 4 Dahua 4MP camera's (and an expansion with two more are planned. My setup will never grow beyond 8 camera's).
I don't have Blue Iris yet.
At the moment I have configured all camera's through the firmware settings to ftp-upload videos/snapshots on motion-trigger (for certain zones) to my machine (Dell Optiplex i5-2500, 8GB ram, 2TB storage).
After some tinkering with the threshold and sensitivity this seems to be working (though with some false alarms due to shadows and lighting).
I'm using free TinyCam (though VPN) to watch videos live on my Android phone. I also have a webserver on my machine that can serve and playback the ftp-uploaded files (still a W.I.P.).
I always thought Blue Iris was essential for my setup, but I'm in doubt now as it seems the firmware capabilities are much more advanced than I thought.
Therefore I'd like to ask the following:
Questions
1. Is Blue iris recommended if I want to record video on motion (much like I do now with the the current firmware method)? What are the advantages over the firmware method?
2. Is Blue Iris recommended if I want to record video 24/7 for 6 camera's (and also record videos on motion triggers)? Or can I use the firmware of the camera's to record 24/7 streams (of the 6 cams) to my machine?
Last edited by a moderator: