I'm still in my trial phase, trying to gather some more knowledge and practical experience as to how to move forward for a permanent install.
For ordinary use, I may not care about >15fps, but I want and will need to go higher FPS on at least two cameras, to have the best chance of capturing identifying details of moving cars, like a car tag and maybe other relevant details, driver, occupants, ...
In my first test setup it seemed that Synology Surveillance Station was always lagging some and had poor image quality (two-three year old DS), poorer than the live view on the hikvision directly. Blamed that on the Syno hardware & software.
Now I have my DS-2CD2032 hooked up with a stretch of 15ft (or so) cat5e to the same POE switch that I'm running a system with Axxon Next on.
Axxon has a nifty little utility that allows a data overlay for each incoming stream what the FPS is incoming from the camera and onto the client viewer. as well as the bandwidth used.
No matter what I try for settings on the Hikvision, it will reportedly only do ~15FPS. Doesn't matter if I set 20 up to 30.
This is on the display overlay, and counted frames in actual recording.
Question is: why?
Bandwidth used for the camera is reported at ~ 1MB/s. CPU use for the entire system is 5-10%. So it shouldn't be a computer capacity problem.
The 720 Foscam runs at ~20FPS depending on time of day, slower at night, haven't fiddled with it more, so it shouldn't be a software problem in Next.
While I've talked to Axxon support on something else, I've quizzed them on this. They're suggesting a quite detailed network analysis with live traffic analysis etc ... but I'm thinking it is not the 1MB/s of data flowing over an otherwise seemingly fine and typically dormant home gigabit network, which by the way starts out with a decent router and runs over Cat 6 to a few GB switches each with a variety of systems attached.
I shut down synology surveillance, to avoid the double pull that was happening. No change in FPS.
No browsers are looking at the live streams or anything.
I'm thinking maybe it is the camera?
[TABLE="class: deviceinfotable"]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Model[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]DS-2CD2032-I[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Serial No.[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]DS-2CD2032-I20140402nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Firmware Version[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]V5.1.0 build 131202[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Encoding Version[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]V5.0 build 131128[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Number of Channels[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]1[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Any other hikvisions that are exhibiting the same trait?
Common issue?
Common solution?
What to look for? Change?
?
I'm going to be on the road for a few days, so I won't be able to try anything right off the bat, unless I can somehow do it all remotely, but next remote login isn't working for me yet (... blame windows? haha). Anyway. I wanted to quiz the community on this, before I head to the airport. Maybe solve the mystery. Or hit the ground running when I get back.
Thanks in advance.
For ordinary use, I may not care about >15fps, but I want and will need to go higher FPS on at least two cameras, to have the best chance of capturing identifying details of moving cars, like a car tag and maybe other relevant details, driver, occupants, ...
In my first test setup it seemed that Synology Surveillance Station was always lagging some and had poor image quality (two-three year old DS), poorer than the live view on the hikvision directly. Blamed that on the Syno hardware & software.
Now I have my DS-2CD2032 hooked up with a stretch of 15ft (or so) cat5e to the same POE switch that I'm running a system with Axxon Next on.
Axxon has a nifty little utility that allows a data overlay for each incoming stream what the FPS is incoming from the camera and onto the client viewer. as well as the bandwidth used.
No matter what I try for settings on the Hikvision, it will reportedly only do ~15FPS. Doesn't matter if I set 20 up to 30.
This is on the display overlay, and counted frames in actual recording.
Question is: why?
Bandwidth used for the camera is reported at ~ 1MB/s. CPU use for the entire system is 5-10%. So it shouldn't be a computer capacity problem.
The 720 Foscam runs at ~20FPS depending on time of day, slower at night, haven't fiddled with it more, so it shouldn't be a software problem in Next.
While I've talked to Axxon support on something else, I've quizzed them on this. They're suggesting a quite detailed network analysis with live traffic analysis etc ... but I'm thinking it is not the 1MB/s of data flowing over an otherwise seemingly fine and typically dormant home gigabit network, which by the way starts out with a decent router and runs over Cat 6 to a few GB switches each with a variety of systems attached.
I shut down synology surveillance, to avoid the double pull that was happening. No change in FPS.
No browsers are looking at the live streams or anything.
I'm thinking maybe it is the camera?
[TABLE="class: deviceinfotable"]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Model[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]DS-2CD2032-I[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Serial No.[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]DS-2CD2032-I20140402nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Firmware Version[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]V5.1.0 build 131202[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Encoding Version[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]V5.0 build 131128[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: rowheader deviceinfotd"]Number of Channels[/TD]
[TD="class: deviceinfotd"]1[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Any other hikvisions that are exhibiting the same trait?
Common issue?
Common solution?
What to look for? Change?
?
I'm going to be on the road for a few days, so I won't be able to try anything right off the bat, unless I can somehow do it all remotely, but next remote login isn't working for me yet (... blame windows? haha). Anyway. I wanted to quiz the community on this, before I head to the airport. Maybe solve the mystery. Or hit the ground running when I get back.
Thanks in advance.