Jessie.slimer
BIT Beta Team
This has been happening throughout written history. Removal of animal organs by means we can't even achieve with modern surgical techniques. Weird.
I used to live about 20 miles in a direct line from the Camp Pendleton artillery training range. The house-shaking booms were fricking Awesome--- Freedom LOL!!! Anyway-- the "lights" shown on that page look VERY MUCH LIKE Illumination flares fired over artillery targets that freaked out so many people where I lived. I took this pic in 2014...'UFO' spotted lurking above U.S.' largest Marine base: 'We got aliens'
Pictures and videos of a possible UFO flying over a Marine base in 2021 were obtained by investigative journalist Jeremy Corbell and shared with Fox News Digital.www.foxnews.com
"A number of well-placed current and former officials have shared detailed information with me regarding this alleged program, including insights into the history, governing documents and the location where a craft was allegedly abandoned and recovered," said Christopher Mellon, who spent nearly twenty years in the U.S. Intelligence Community and served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.NASIC, headquartered at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, is the Department of Defense’s primary Air Force source for foreign air and space threat analysis. Its mission is to “discover and characterize air, space, missile, and cyber threats,” according to the agency’s website. “The center’s team of trusted subject matter experts deliver unique collection, exploitation, and analytic capabilities not found elsewhere,” the website states.
Grey said that such immense capabilities are not merely relegated to the study of the prosaic. “The existence of complex historical programs involving the coordinated retrieval and study of exotic materials, dating back to the early 20th century, should no longer remain a secret,” he said. “The majority of retrieved, foreign exotic materials have a prosaic terrestrial explanation and origin – but not all, and any number higher than zero in this category represents an undeniably significant statistical percentage.” -The Debrief
"Dead pilots"? It's non-sequiturs like this that show just how disconnected these UFO claims are from reality.
We are currently on the cusp of developing aircraft that will be autonomously piloted by artificial intelligence. In twenty to thirty years, we'll have aircraft and spacecraft controlled by human-equivalent minds but without the expense and inconvenience of human bodies. It will make absolutely no sense to send real people to perform hazardous reconnaissance missions that can be handled far more efficiently by intelligent machines.
So why would alien races that are centuries more advanced than us be incapable of doing exactly what we'll soon be doing? The answer, of course, is that the stories of "space aliens" are coming from people who could never imagine a situation where a living being would not be in charge, so that's the story they tell.
Stories of alien encounters, no matter how detailed, always fall to pieces when examined critically in the light of technological progress. Go back and read the story of Barney and Betty Hill and you'll realize that they made up the entire story of their alien encounter in 1961, weaving together elements of popular culture. It's painfully obvious when the aliens show no knowledge or use of anything remotely resembling current technology. The "aliens" are just caricatures of what was shown in TV shows and movies of the day.
The Travis Walton story is one of multitudes of similar tales, many corroborated by witnesses, of other-worldly (either angels or aliens) visitation with absolutely zero supporting evidence. I dismiss it as I would any tale like it with one simple question: "Why him?" Is there some logical reason why aliens would choose to kidnap that particular person in full view of witnesses? They could learn everything about our language and culture by monitoring TV and radio broadcasts, or the Internet. They could collect all the biological samples they wanted without ever being noticed. And assuming they wanted biological samples, wouldn't they have collected them decades or centuries ago? A hoax is an infinitely more likely explanation.While I tend to agree with your view on the topic, there are some puzzling episodes that are difficult to explain. One that comes to mind is the Travis Walton alleged abduction. If you have time and interest, there's a documentary called Travis: The True Story of Travis Walton available free on Tubi. On the surface one might think the event they describe is just made-up BS. However, when you see these five men interviewed it's hard (at least to me) to believe they're fabricating the story. They all passed polygraphs at the time of the incident; each of them has suffered rather than profited from their account. I'd be interested in your (and anyone else's) opinion after watching the documentary.
Update: I just remembered that one of the guys was offered $10,000 (back in the 70s that was serious cash) if he would come clean and expose the hoax. He didn't take the money.
The Travis Walton story is one of multitudes of similar tales, many corroborated by witnesses, of other-worldly (either angels or aliens) visitation with absolutely zero supporting evidence. I dismiss it as I would any tale like it with one simple question: "Why him?" Is there some logical reason why aliens would choose to kidnap that particular person in full view of witnesses? They could learn everything about our language and culture by monitoring TV and radio broadcasts, or the Internet. They could collect all the biological samples they wanted without ever being noticed. And assuming they wanted biological samples, wouldn't they have collected them decades or centuries ago? A hoax is an infinitely more likely explanation.
As to his "witnesses", there are several explanations that would explain their silence: fear, greed, coercion, or embarrassment to name a few. People go to their graves every day swearing to things that aren't true. And if you want a polygraph to mean anything, you shouldn't have it administered by parties that have a vested interest in hearing one specific answer, i.e. the Enquirer and the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization.
I don't doubt there is other life in this universe besides us, but I can only shake my head at people who want to convince themselves that beings hundreds or thousands of years more advanced than us can think of nothing better to do with their time than kidnap random people and torture them for no good reason.
UFOlogy is nothing if not a pseudoscience, and one of the primary characteristics of pseudoscience is that the effect that is claimed to exist fades into the noise as better instruments are applied to attempt to measure it.I'd like to see some really clear photos of a UFO. Why is it always some blurry dot? Or some weird reflective object? Or filmed by someone who can't hold the camera steady? Why are there perfectly clear photos of airplanes and other flying devices but nothing of some alien craft?
That's simple. They get off on it. Every alien that I have met has been a real sadistic a-hole. They just love showing humans how insignificant they are.So why would alien races that are centuries more advanced than us be incapable of doing exactly what we'll soon be doing?
UFOlogy is nothing if not a pseudoscience, and one of the primary characteristics of pseudoscience is that the effect that is claimed to exist fades into the noise as better instruments are applied to attempt to measure it.
The world is awash in portable high-resolution cameras, yet UFOs images haven't changed one bit. They're still just amorphous blobs that can easily be explained away as optical artifacts. However, there is one benefit of everyone carrying a cellphone: you can be quite certain that there will never again be another UFO kidnapping in full view of multiple witnesses, as claimed by Travis Walton. For some strange reason, the aliens will never again attempt it.