This is regarding my Big Brother comment:
Traffic enforcement cameras are a form of mass surveillance over ordinary and innocent Tennessee motorists
Naming and shaming the wrong person?
Tickets are issued to the registered owner of the vehicle, even if they are not the driver and many traffic camera tickets are going to people who did not, in fact, commit the offense because someone else was driving at the time.
So how is that going to work for your plan of "I want your insurance rate to go up"?
This is regarding my 85th percentile comment (aka traffic survey or traffic study)
Traffic cameras are typically placed without first performing a traffic study intended to confirm the speed limit and determine the effect on traffic patterns
This is regarding your cobbled together setup:
The right to face your accuser in court and cross-examine witnesses is guaranteed by the United States Bill of Rights, and traffic enforcement cameras deny Tennesseans this right, because the accuser is a machine
And where did I get those comments you may ask?
Tennessee Senate Bill 1128 which was signed into law in 2015
http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/109/Bill/SB1128.pdf
More comments on the 'traffic study'
Requirement that a municipality conduct a traffic engineering study prior to the installation of a new unmanned traffic enforcement camera. Such a study must be completed in accordance with the standard engineering practices of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and certified by a licensed engineer specializing in traffic engineering.
A POST-certified officer must review the evidence
Lastly, as of July 1, 2015, unmanned traffic enforcement cameras used to monitor speed and issue speeding citations are prohibited except within the designated distance of a marked school zone and any S-curve of a public highway or road
Unmanned Traffic Enforcement Cameras | MTAS
Nice Work!
And where did I get those comments you may ask?
You do understand why these laws were made? Corruption!
1st off it was a money/greed issue.
They start to shorten the control lights turning from yellow to red. to make more money. They got caught.
Legislators decided to go after the whole kitchen sink as they were getting tickets too. They normally don't get tickets just like the cops.
There a lot of "tricks" that enforcement plays with speed zones that are unfair.
Naming and shaming the wrong person?
The answer to your question is, there is no arrest the vehicle is insured NOT the driver.
![Wink ;) ;)]()
Why can't you just slow down?
Everyone was given fair warning via signage. 85% finally complied.
I already have had commercial drivers disciplined. No more speeding commercial vehicles! That's how that work! How did they all know a the same time when I only popped two of them? hmmmmm
Wouldn't you want to know the person who was driving your car was abusing their privilege?
We will have to get head-on/side face shots running. Thanks for the info.
"
This is regarding your cobbled together setup:" I find this comment unnecessary. I won't take personal shots at you.
I repeat, I never asked for an arrest. I think if your vehicle speeds in excess down my road multiple times, somebody should ask why? I don't want to be a vigilante that's why we have a police force. Is it not?
Taking your opinion of the law, what if they broke into my house and I had a clear camera shot of their face? Same thing? Right? That's means the news posting video shots is illegal.
The reason for the law was government corruption. Not any safety issue.
This also isn't the law I am concerned with.
Why can't you just slow down?
More comments on the 'traffic study'
I don't need a traffic study. I'm not the "city" Quote from police chief "There are things a private citizen can do that the police can't"
I did ask for a stop sign and got that exact answer by the way. So no stop sign, no speed bumps.
Why can't people just slow down.
So I got your point the first time. I being through all of this with the police and city. It's not like I just did this thing with no idea of the political bullshit.
Just like the"calibration" issue, you are only interested in throwing crap in the path and offer no solution.
Apparently you know how to get away with speeding, at least all the legal issues. Me too.
Why can't you just slow down?
How would you stop the excessive speeding, and reckless acts on your street? It's easy to be the disruptor. Any positive suggests to solve this problem?
The office who was during a radar check stated "there is nothing to be gained by speeding down this road. It's too short, and has stops on each end."
Excuse while I clean up another dead pet off the road.
Why can't you just slow down? Tears in my eyes.
600 cars per week, seems to me they could do much better job in enforcement.
68mph? 52mph? or 25mph?
The whole problem in this country is there is no middle ground. This is why YOU dwell on the arrest issue even after I told you it was a non-issue. People have to take advantage. They spin their side, never considering the other side.
You have stated your case. I have a problem. Whats the fair solution? I'm not going to let you continuously speed in my neighborhood.
If you can offer no solution, then I have read enough from you. Nothing you have stated is news to me, my lawyer, or the city. Hopefully others have learned what to expect from the opposition.
=============================================================================================================================
I would like to get back to the technical details. The system has only been alive for a few months and needs much more work. Obviously we need face recognition as well.
The political objections lead to more technical work.
=============================================================================================================================