US Elections (& Politics) :)

I'm quite far from Left Sparky ;)
I didnt post any "vile" posts

You're judging on a 2 posts not the last 200 or so pages.

I showed you were wrong to jump so quickly on both

You came here to give me shit. Fine., Your prerogative.

I'm not playing your game.
And it IS personal
Fuck off, you're on ignore... talk to yourself
 
Big difference between law and a “pledge” with no repercussions

I’m sure it will work out fine

 
  • Sad
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
I wasn’t in the courtroom and I’m not a certified lawyer, so there that.

But sure sounds like a precarious position

 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
Given the files that came out this week (see Pandemic thread) under Rand Paul’s disclosure effort, it’s odd that the Trump administration is still supporting the jabs…

 
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
Rather over the top and likely very illegal if true…

Expect to see more, there are Administration officials quoted


 
Last edited:
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
Interesting take on housing

 
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: johnfitz
The President of the United States…


 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
IMG_1845.png
 
  • Sad
Reactions: johnfitz
The nuclear deal document did not include the requirement for Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, but Wright and the Saudi’s knew that it was required, so it didn’t have to be written into the deal?? Really?

 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
This one's too easy... I'll leave it to your own interpretations... :rofl:


(*Some of the meme's in the thread are gold :winktongue:)

 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter

National Guard Signs $292M Housing Contract for Troops in Washington, D.C.​

The deal would provide 2,000 “apartment-style lodging units” for service members deployed in the city.

www.notus.org

National Guard Signs $292M Housing Contract for Troops in Washington, D.C.

The deal would provide 2,000 “apartment-style lodging units” for service members deployed in the city.
www.notus.org www.notus.org
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and MrSurly
The subsidies for ACA policyholders (written-in refund in order to pretend the real cost was low) were written solely by Dems and were written to END (sunset) last year. It was a common trick used to hide the true costs of premiums. It was written and voted in SOLELY by Dems and only Dems can be blamed for the end of the subsidies. Trump and the Reps didn't end them, Trump and the Reps did not raise premiums, Democrats wrote that bill. They assumed that another group of Dems would fix it later. Not a single Republican created the sunset of the subsidies, nor changed anything about the ACA. Obama's people created it, forced down it our throats and now they own it. Including the increase that that they wrote into it. People who have me on 'ignore' won't get to see this and then run to twitter to screenshot a reply... unless they lied about the ignore thing, of course.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: garycrist, tigerwillow1 and Oceanslider
MrSurly said:
The subsidies for ACA policyholders (written-in refund in order to pretend the real cost was low) were written solely by Dems and were written to END (sunset) last year. It was a common trick used to hide the true costs of premiums. It was written and voted in SOLELY by Dems and only Dems can be blamed for the end of the subsidies. Trump and the Reps didn't end them, Trump and the Reps did not raise premiums, Democrats wrote that bill. They assumed that another group of Dems would fix it later. Not a single Republican created the sunset of the subsidies, nor changed anything about the ACA. Obama's people created it, forced down it our throats and now they own it. Including the increase that that they wrote into it. People who have me on 'ignore' won't get to see this and then run to twitter to screenshot a reply... unless they lied about the ignore thing, of course.
Click to expand...
Replying to myself to add that the Dems passed Obamacare using legislative "shenanigans" involving creating a house bill to utilize a budgetary reconciliation process to pass the bill even though, the voters did not want it.
Watch 'em squeal whenever the other side talks of reconciliation to pass the SAVE act. The Dems will pretend that THEY wouldn't ever do that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: garycrist
dog-not-for-sale.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz, mat200, wrapter and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom