I tape them up with coax seal....http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias=aps&field-keywords=coax+sealI'm just kind of curious what you guys do with your unused DC pigtails when you're using POE and the camera is outside? Do you cover them, tape them, cut them off, or just leave them and not worry about water or anything getting in?
My apologies to UberOverLord, but I gotta agree with fenderman on this one. I don't doubt that there is some benefit to the desiccant packets, but it just isn't practical. We install systems with 20-50+ exterior cameras. While the idea is novel of having the packet absorb moisture away from the connection, the cost of maintaining such an operation every year wouldn't be cost effective for most installations, with the exception of perhaps maritime or military appliations that either need or think they need such a measure taken. In my professional opinion, there are best practices regarding how you use your conduit, boxes, gaskets, and connectors, plus installing in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines that will make the desiccant packets unnecessary.I see, so you installed hikvision ip cameras back in 60's....You tested this theory on the hundreds of cams you installed? Stop making the poor op waste his time.... Can you imagine the labor costs if large scale operations would go around changing desiccant packets?
And what is the Life of an ip camera? 5 years, 10? 20?
How long are you expecting the life to extend....
Sent via Taptalk
Your "evidence" consists of an article written by the manufacturer of desiccants...need i say more.Please re-red my post. I never said or even suggested that the relative humidity would need to be exceeded more days than not.
http://www.ipcamtalk.com/showthread...Pigtails-Outside?p=26657&viewfull=1#post26657
My evidence is here and can be located on the Internet, where's yours, beside "Believe what I say".
Don
Your reaction is spot on.Overlord can you point me to actual data that indicates an improvement for outdoor designed electronics with desiccant installed?
My knee jerk reaction is to think you are just ignorant about the absorption volume of these small consumer packs, but I'd like to give you the benefit of doubt.
How dare you try to spin this as though I cast any negativity towards the military or its training. You slid that remark in during one of your many edits in the hopes that it would go unnoticed. Shame shame shame on you.It's not relevant to me that you have no respect for U.S. military training.
You have stated that U.S. military training, does not impress you. Many times in the Forum.
Yet you eagerly are always willing to "Trash-Talk" U.S. military training as not impressing you much.
Don
Yes I said im not impressed with YOUR training. There are lots of dolts in the military just as there are in civilian life. You are one of those dolts. Any training you did properly absorb is outdated anyways. You dont get a free pass to write manifestos containing utter nonsense because you served in the military.I dare fenderman.
You have stated many times in this forum that you are not impressed with my military training. I have links.
If you are even 1/2 right about this subject matter fenderman, then you would be able to quickly find a respected source on the Internet making the claim that desiccant has no value for extending the life of electronic equipment. Locating information like that does not take 20-40 years.
Don
Don
I am waiting for you to understand, that we are talking specifically about ip cameras. There is no way to prove this unless you do long term tests..im telling you that i have hundreds of installed cameras in the field, most outdoors - your suggestion is laughable. EVEN of you were correct, which you are not, the camera would be obsolete before any benefit would be realized...who are you kidding here.Fenderman.
I'm waiting for your corroborating evidence that desiccant cannot extend the lifespan of outdoor electronics and no amount of adding more of your speculating and conjecture based words on top of the mountain of speculation and conjecture based words you already have presented on this subject matter will change that.
Don
Rule #1
Don't confuse the use of desiccant packets for the purpose of trying to reduce lens fogging with anything to do with or to have any connection with extending the life of electronic circuit boards and connectors. Because the two subjects are apples and oranges.
Directly associating the failure of desiccant to reduce or eliminate lens fogging with any inability to extend the lifespan of electronic equipment, because of that failure to reduce or eliminate lens fogging. Is beyond absurd.
Secondly. You seem to also have quantity issues. Because nobody suggested filling anything with desiccant packets.
Don