About models in use

pyspilf

pyspilf

Getting the hang of it
May 22, 2017
80
61
Madrid, Spain
Not sure if this has been discussed already, search didn't find anything.

Running BI 5.9.9.9 and CP AI 2.9.4 & YOLOv5 6.2

BI is configured as shown:

1733149897299.png

1733149928526.png

I have never been able to change this list.

Now on at a camera level, it is set like this - as far as I understand this should indicate to use only ipcam-combined, and would override what is set as a general config...

1733150021627.png

Having a look at the CP AI console I see this - I see all models being used...

1733150244331.png

Unsure if this is happening on the general trigger or the static object analysis.

Has anyone seen this before? Have I misconfigured something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrbeddow
pyspilf said:
Not sure if this has been discussed already, search didn't find anything.

Running BI 5.9.9.9 and CP AI 2.9.4 & YOLOv5 6.2

BI is configured as shown:

View attachment 208629

View attachment 208630

I have never been able to change this list.

Now on at a camera level, it is set like this - as far as I understand this should indicate to use only ipcam-combined, and would override what is set as a general config...

View attachment 208631

Having a look at the CP AI console I see this - I see all models being used...

View attachment 208632

Unsure if this is happening on the general trigger or the static object analysis.

Has anyone seen this before? Have I misconfigured something?
Click to expand...
I am running the latest stable version of Blue Iris with Code Project version 2.9.3 & YOLOv5 .NET
I am seeing the same behavior in the Code Project log.
I am seeing inferences returning vehicle even though I am not using the ipcam-general model, and even seeing returns of day plate, even though I do not use the ALPR module, it isn't installed.
The number of inferences also seems unusually high. I switch from ipcam-combined to ipcam-dark at dusk. I usually see car and Car returned in the CPAI log. My experience is that ipcam-combined has labels that are lower case, and ipcam-dark has labels that are proper case, the first character is upper case.


Sent from my iPlay_50 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: pyspilf and jrbeddow
I ran into this as well, the solution seems to be to explicitly specify the desired models in use in the static detection dialog box. The downside is that (as of 5.9.9.9, haven't tried the just released 5.9.9.10) this static detection box does not "track" with profile changes, it remains the same in all profiles. Which means that you may have to insert ALL the desired "in-use" models here (otherwise the release notes DO indicate that ALL models will be used), when in fact that profile may only require a specific model (Night profile corresponding with ipcam-dark, for example).
Hopefully this eventually becomes a dialog box that does track on a per-profile case basis.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pyspilf
jrbeddow said:
I ran into this as well, the solution seems to be to explicitly specify the desired models in use in the static detection dialog box. The downside is that (as of 5.9.9.9, haven't tried the just released 5.9.9.10) this static detection box does not "track" with profile changes, it remains the same in all profiles. Which means that you may have to insert ALL the desired "in-use" models here (otherwise the release notes DO indicate that ALL models will be used), when in fact that profile may only require a specific model (Night profile corresponding with ipcam-dark, for example).
Hopefully this eventually becomes a dialog box that does track on a per-profile case basis.
Click to expand...

OK, I hate it when I miss the obvious... :lmao:

The custom model field in the static object analysis window was staring me right in the face and it was blank... I had filled it in the previous dialog for Alert Confirmation but not in the Static Object Analysis one...

I will try and change it there, and see if it resolves the behavior I am seeing, thanks a lot for pointing that out!!

Later today I will also try to install 5.9.9.10 and see, hopefully soon this feature will also work with profile changes.
 
1733210156339.png
 
pyspilf said:
OK, I hate it when I miss the obvious... :lmao:

The custom model field in the static object analysis window was staring me right in the face and it was blank... I had filled it in the previous dialog for Alert Confirmation but not in the Static Object Analysis one...

I will try and change it there, and see if it resolves the behavior I am seeing, thanks a lot for pointing that out!!

Later today I will also try to install 5.9.9.10 and see, hopefully soon this feature will also work with profile changes.
Click to expand...

I can confirm that having specified the model(s) I want to use also in the static object analysis window (which I had missed before) removes the entries related to the other models in the CP AI log. So now, CP AI is using only the model(s) I expected.

It was a mistake on my part, not having noticed the models need to be specified both in the alerts confirmation window and the static object analysis window. I initially thought the static object analysis would inherit from the alerts confirmation, so I didn't even consider this could be the issue.

Thanks again @jrbeddow for pointing me in the right direction

​

 
  • Like
Reactions: jrbeddow
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom