TechBill
Known around here
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2014
- Messages
- 1,772
- Reaction score
- 1,182
Another reason not to use Ring
- Thread starter TechBill
- Start date
I’m in to privacy, but the requests from police just don’t bother me that much. I can say no to the request. I’d probably say yes though to help out.
I do get not sharing stats on who said no/yes to the police requests. That is not cool.
I do get not sharing stats on who said no/yes to the police requests. That is not cool.
I've said it before...Amazon and Google are getting way too big and too Orwellian, IMO.
Many of you already knew that Ring is owned by Amazon, which bought the firm last year for more than $800 million. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post where this following article appears so consider that when you read it and expect objective content:
Doorbell-camera firm Ring has partnered with 400 police forces, extending surveillance concerns
Many of you already knew that Ring is owned by Amazon, which bought the firm last year for more than $800 million. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post where this following article appears so consider that when you read it and expect objective content:
Doorbell-camera firm Ring has partnered with 400 police forces, extending surveillance concerns