The problem with many of the cheap cameras are that their firmware is designed to give a nice bright static image at night. That comes at the cost of poor performance with an object in motion.
And the user can do nothing to correct this even with settings because it has been shown that Reolink (and most consumer grade cameras) favor nice bright static images at night over performance.
So at some point even if you can set shutter settings and other settings as I mentioned in your other
thread, the camera will override your input in favor of a nice bright image. This is done by slowing down the shutter and increasing the gain. So then you see what Reolinks are notorious for - ghost blur invisible person images at night and inability to capture plates.
So the difference between a better camera like say a Dahua and some no-name camera on Amazon is that you can set parameters on the Dahua and it will hold. If you set parameters on these other cameras that would result in a darker image the algorithm internally says "idiot alert" and it won't let you set parameters that the firmware thinks will result in not displaying a nice bright image.
Don't believe me, set the shutter to 1/10,000 at night and the image should be completely black. It won't with any cheap camera. It will override your 1/10,000 shutter and favor a bright image. It is a good test to determine how good the camera is.
But most consumer grade camera manufacturers know that consumers chase MP, so to keep costs down, they will put 1/3" or 1/2.8" sensors in the cameras. And 8MP on a 1/3" sensor looks great on default settings for a static image at night....and that is what the consumer looks at. No consumer then tests it with motion.