To celebrate my 1000th post, I would like to ask the awesome members of this amazing forum their opinion on camera selection for two different placements. I'm anticipating the arrival of a refurbed Color4K/X from Andy and two 5449 dual-lens cameras. Really looking forward to playing with the 5449s as I'm intrigued by the color/IR stitching and some of the possibilities. The cameras being replaced are 2431-S-S2 with 1/3" lenses so going colour at night is challenging even with the Cuban Runway Lighting(tm) setup. Also, the 2431s are a bit "dumb" and can't separate cats, dogs and plastic bags from humans and cars. So reviewing footage will get much easier now.
So, without further verbiage, here we go!

This above pic will have a 5449 installed. As well as the 5449 will be mounted so that the IR (currently off) doesn't bounce off the wall and wash out the pic. I've neglected this placement too long.
Now here's the question... Which placement gets the 4K/X (2.8mm) and which gets the 5449 (3.6mm)? I've been going back and forth with this in my head and I think I know, I just want to run it by you folks first.

I'm leaning towards the 4K/X for this view. The only thing stopping me from being 100% certain is that there are some really dark areas in the garden which I think the 5449 would cover better. I'm really trying to avoid not making the install permanent as it's bit of a hassle to get the ladder out and switch cams as they're mounted 6m (20') off the ground. And, no, I can't mount them lower as then they would be on the downstairs neighbour's property.
And here's the other view where I'm leaning towards the 5449. I'm certain that I can get an overlap between the two 5449s mounted side by side (so to speak) even though they're both 3.6mm. With the 2.8m 2431s, I get a decent overlap. About 4m (17') is mounted one of the 200 watt dual-panel LED reflectors. So light is not an issue and I know the 4K/X would eat it up.
What sayeth the forum?

So, without further verbiage, here we go!

This above pic will have a 5449 installed. As well as the 5449 will be mounted so that the IR (currently off) doesn't bounce off the wall and wash out the pic. I've neglected this placement too long.
Now here's the question... Which placement gets the 4K/X (2.8mm) and which gets the 5449 (3.6mm)? I've been going back and forth with this in my head and I think I know, I just want to run it by you folks first.

I'm leaning towards the 4K/X for this view. The only thing stopping me from being 100% certain is that there are some really dark areas in the garden which I think the 5449 would cover better. I'm really trying to avoid not making the install permanent as it's bit of a hassle to get the ladder out and switch cams as they're mounted 6m (20') off the ground. And, no, I can't mount them lower as then they would be on the downstairs neighbour's property.
And here's the other view where I'm leaning towards the 5449. I'm certain that I can get an overlap between the two 5449s mounted side by side (so to speak) even though they're both 3.6mm. With the 2.8m 2431s, I get a decent overlap. About 4m (17') is mounted one of the 200 watt dual-panel LED reflectors. So light is not an issue and I know the 4K/X would eat it up.
What sayeth the forum?

Last edited: