Harassment at night

I was a contractor for the cable company for several years. When we did modular homes and didn't want to get on our hands and knees, we would drill tuck the cables between the skirt and the plastic flashing that held the skirt to the home. We always drilled holes through the floor for the cable on the outside wall. It's was the easiest and quickest installs we had to do. You might need something like a fish stick to get it through the insulation and plastic. You should only need to drill one hole through the floor were your dvr or switch would be.

I'm a little confused by what you're saying. This is what they call a UBC modular ( Universal Building Codes ) and is mounted on a regular foundation, not a skirt. So cables would have to go from the eaves where the cameras are mounted, down inside the walls, and then down through the insulation and plastic sheet and into the crawl space. Someone did it when they installed the sensor lights on the eaves for us, but I've never done anything like that, and am 66 years old with not so great knees, so I stay out of the crawl space.

If you are comfortable with computers and have a decent one already, you could save some money by using HikVision cameras with their free PC software - iVMS-4200. You have to leave your PC running 24-7. Let the NVR Server program record in the background and you won't even know it's there.

That sounds cool, but my PC sleeps at night, so I was thinking of a way to do this with a DVR that would record the video independently, and interface with my PC over our wifi.
 
As far as using only 2 cameras, I have a technical background, as I think I mentioned. I still have a registered version of AutoCAD 2002, which still works on my Win 7 PC here. I had a drawing of this house and lot, from 2004, that I used to plan it on the lot. I just took it and made a few tweaks for this discussion. Our house has a water ditch running on the left side there, with a slope - hard to get into. The thick line around most of the lot represents fenced areas that also make it hard to get into. The open area on the lower right is unfenced, and the driveway area that is open. I drew arrows showing where we need coverage. Being we don't have the money to cover the whole place, this is the most likely area that these jerks would come in. The little window that juts out on the lower right is actually a set of bay windows all along that room, and the place where these guys banged on my sister's bedroom window. But you see why I'm not certain if 3 cameras could cover that entire scope of area, especially at night with night vision, I'm just not sure. I don't know as much as you guys do.

Oh, we just figured something else out too. To the left of that water ditch is a relatively main street, and our side street runs down the lower part from there, to our driveway and other houses on our block. But about 2 blocks below our house here, is a church that has big programs to treat alcoholics and junkies, many of which apparently live in the neighborhood and walk down that street to the left of the water ditch, at all hours. ( I was telling my neighbor to the right, about this yesterday, and he mentioned this. And my neighbor on the top side of this drawing ( told them too, yesterday ) said that they've had all kinds of things ripped off from their place - bikes, tools ( he's a remodeler ) etc. They're feeling like shooting someone, but I told them they cant do that. Colorado has a "make my day law" but ONLY if someone actually breaks into your house, and they could be in deep trouble if they shot someone just for stealing from their vehicles, etc.

Anyway, thinking about this, it may not be harassment, as much as some junkies testing whether they could break into our house, and if anyone is home. So in addition to the cameras, I looked at the motion sensor lights that we originally put in around the perimeter and evaluated that. It's been 10 years and along the right side, we have one dual one that looks down the driveway, but one bulb is burnt out and the sensor needs cleaning, it isn't going on so easily anymore - I can do that. But we never put one at that bay window, and we need to do that, because apparently these guys are entering the yard from the lower right, which is dark. So I'm going to get that done too - just need someone to run the wires and install it. But deterrent will go a long way too, if these are just junkies looking for an easy target to break into at night.



attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 5711 W KENTUCKY - final - for camera layout-Model.jpg
    5711 W KENTUCKY - final - for camera layout-Model.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 13
  • HOUSE FOR CAMERA FORUM.jpg
    HOUSE FOR CAMERA FORUM.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 113
Here is something that might help you decide on number of cameras, and camera lens size.

Goto the IP Camera Calculator at http://ipvm.com/calculator
Plug in the resolution of a camera and its field of view, along with a distance to an object you want to be able to identify.
As an example, one of the HikVision DS-2CD2332-I cameras with a 4mm lens and set to record at 1080p, has a field of view of 79 degrees, so you would select 1080p, and set angle of view to 79. Now you can play around with various distances to get a feel for what the camera would see.

If you had one of the above cameras mounted on the house and facing down the driveway, and the driveway is 30' long, the width of the area the camera could cover at the street would be 49.46', and a person or a license plate at the end of the driveway might barely be identifiable in the daytime, but would probably be too blurred at night to make a positive ID. At 30' an object would be displayed with a resolution of about 39 pixels per foot (ppf), and the recommended resolution is 80 ppf. As the object gets closer to the camera, the pixels per foot go up, so at 15' the resolution of an object would be 77.7 ppf, and the width of the camera image would be 24.7'.

Two of these cameras mounted as near to the bottom right corner of the house as shown in your drawing, with one on the right wall, and one on the bottom wall, could be angled so that they slightly overlap each other, and would cover an arc of about 150 degrees. Three cameras could be set such that you could see the length of both walls, and have overlapping coverage in the middle so there aren't any blind spots (other than vegetation) on those two sides of the house.

I've attached a tech bulletin from Hik that lists the FOV for most of their cameras, other than the cameras they introduced this year.
 

Attachments

What I would personally do in the budget way: Get 1 or 2 decent wireless IP cameras (Hikvision dome for outdoor 3MP ~$100) and cover the most important areas, for the rest area I would get imitation cameras and plenty of warning signs "beware of the dog", "under 24 video surveillance" etc... I don't have or need NVR, I just record on SD card and send email notification, I do though record couple of cams on my network attached storage, but that wasn't an extra cost for me. If you have a PC, you could also simply use free pc software to do the recording. Also, I wouldn't hire anyone to install, just mount the cam on the exterior wall and run the wire outside.

If you insist on having full coverage and have $300 to spend then perhaps this is an option, but I doubt it will as good quality as budget Hikvision cams:

http://www.costco.com/Q-See-4-Chann...and-100'-Night-Vision.product.100151663.html#
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is your best bet for the price and quality you will get, now the sale ends August 31st, so if you want it, better go grab it.
What you should do is go get that kit, and you can test it out and see if you like it. Which I'm sure you will, and if not, then return it for a refund.

It will cost more to install the analog kit because you need to homerun everything.
This is cheapest ip kit you can get http://www.samsclub.com/sams/qsee-4x4-secrty-sys/prod11570578.ip?navAction=
Disregard the photos as they have a picture of the CVI kit that uses analog cables, but its the ip camera kit the is being sold. The images on the bottom of the page are accurate, the top images are not.
Dont make the mistake of installing analog from the get go. you will be sorry.
 
you can manually plug in values, but a lot of the niftier features are for subscribers only.
 
you can manually plug in values, but a lot of the niftier features are for subscribers only.

Right. I just wanted to be able to place multiple cams. It did show me that I definitely don't want default lenses and should prolly go 4mm or bigger.


8dffc714bffe2f5989aba9cdb141a128.jpg


Theoretical positioning. Does 4mm sound right?


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
4mm fine. I would say maybe 6mm top and bottom but actually 4mm will be fine there too.

I find too many people buy 2.8mm and are not getting enough detail when they need proper footage.