IPVM Releases Phone Version of Calculator

Joined
Nov 17, 2022
Messages
6
Reaction score
7
Location
Utah
New member here...planned on giving the IPVM Calculator a try for some of Andy's cameras. Working on a design for the new home. Take it from an engineer....90 seconds is not enough time as a new user to the tool to even determine if it's worth spending $199 on. I would be willing to pay a monthly fee (cancel any time) to use the tool. I think most folks are willing to pay, but the annual fee doesn't make a lot of sense for the average homeowner. Please consider offering an option for paid short term usage.

You could even consider charging a fee for the app, and after paying that fee the user has access for a reduced number of cameras unless they purchase a "pro" subscription or whatever term you like.
 

john-ipvm

Known around here
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
409
Reaction score
648
annual fee doesn't make a lot of sense for the average homeowner
That makes sense to me but IPVM is not particularly built to serve the average homeowner. We do not get many homeowners using IPVM and that's likely a reflection of where our coverage focuses (commercial / enterprise, etc.). We could theoretically implement a less expensive plan with a reduced number of cameras (in line with your suggestion), but I am not sure it would attract enough usage to even justify the time setting that up and the complexity that would add in showing more plan options to everyone.

I understand where you are coming from, we're just not well set up nor do I see how we could be well set up to serve the average homeowner. I am not trying to convince anyone here, just trying to explain the constraints and challenges we are operating under.
 

cam26

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Jan 21, 2019
Messages
204
Reaction score
82
Location
USA
That makes sense to me but IPVM is not particularly built to serve the average homeowner. We do not get many homeowners using IPVM and that's likely a reflection of where our coverage focuses (commercial / enterprise, etc.). We could theoretically implement a less expensive plan with a reduced number of cameras (in line with your suggestion), but I am not sure it would attract enough usage to even justify the time setting that up and the complexity that would add in showing more plan options to everyone.

I understand where you are coming from, we're just not well set up nor do I see how we could be well set up to serve the average homeowner. I am not trying to convince anyone here, just trying to explain the constraints and challenges we are operating under.
I appreciate the response and somewhat understand, but your calculator operated for a long time without the time constraints. If services for the average homeowner are not what you are going after, then why impose the time limit at all? This is especially true since you don’t even offer a reasonable paying option for that group of users, who are people like us here on this forum. It’s not like you’re pushing us to a pay option, you’re basically just telling us to pound sand. Is it simply because you no longer want average homeowners using your product?

I’ll note that you WERE set up to serve the average homeowner just fine, until you made the decision to push them out.
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2022
Messages
6
Reaction score
7
Location
Utah
That makes sense to me but IPVM is not particularly built to serve the average homeowner. We do not get many homeowners using IPVM and that's likely a reflection of where our coverage focuses (commercial / enterprise, etc.). We could theoretically implement a less expensive plan with a reduced number of cameras (in line with your suggestion), but I am not sure it would attract enough usage to even justify the time setting that up and the complexity that would add in showing more plan options to everyone.

I understand where you are coming from, we're just not well set up nor do I see how we could be well set up to serve the average homeowner. I am not trying to convince anyone here, just trying to explain the constraints and challenges we are operating under.
It was pretty obvious that your target audience is professionals. I can also understand not wanting to offer the service to an average homeowner since there is a learning curve and I would suspect a good portion of folks just don’t care about the technical side of things. However,it might make sense to offer a special user account to ipcamtalk members - not advertised to the general public. Generally speaking, I suspect most folks here are either technical enough or willing to learn to use the tools. You could just offer short term paid access to the tool without any support on your end.
 

john-ipvm

Known around here
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
409
Reaction score
648
then why impose the time limit at all?
It is to encourage professionals to pay for using the IPVM calculator. Without a time limit, even professionals can do various designs and calculations indefinitely. Since we implemented the change, the weekly number of saved calculated cameras rose 30%+ and the trend continues unabated.

might make sense to offer a special user account to ipcamtalk members
Possibly, what would ipcamtalk provide in exchange? To provide some further context, it costs money to provide the Calculator, most specifically Google Cloud Maps API charges (over $1,000 per month).

You could just offer short term paid access to the tool without any support on your end.
At what price point? And how many people would sign up? I am trying to figure out how we support this as a business and that's why if we can't I've recommended the JVSG online tool, others have mentioned using Google Maps directly (for free), etc.
 

bp2008

Staff member
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
11,951
Reaction score
12,279
Location
USA
@john-ipvm My thought is a one-time payment of $10 or $20 or something for calculator access, but that is of course dev work on your end and I honestly doubt many people would pay for it.
 

bp2008

Staff member
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
11,951
Reaction score
12,279
Location
USA
For that matter, I suspect just requiring (free) authentication to load the calculator could significantly reduce the fees to google. As it is with a time limit I'd bet you are seeing higher fees.
 

tech_junkie

Pulling my weight
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
332
Reaction score
238
Location
South Dakota
I'd be happy to pay a small fee, but $199 for personal use is simply too expensive.
Its a little high, especially when pros wouldn't have a need for this.
a long time ago, I made some cardboard triangles to represent my view angles until I could judge a 2.8mm Vs 3.6mm camera in a spot without it.
 

john-ipvm

Known around here
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
409
Reaction score
648
especially when pros wouldn't have a need for this.
There are lots of "pros" but we see lots of "pros" using and paying for IPVM's calculator or competitors such as JVSG or System Surveyor.

I made some cardboard triangles to represent my view angles until I could judge a 2.8mm Vs 3.6mm camera in a spot without it.
Pros are using our tool or competitors to e.g., have the exact model's AoV precalculated on a map, to see what it looks like on street view, satellite view, to calculate cable lengths, to print out design documents to give to prospects, installers, etc.
 

samplenhold

Known around here
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
5,394
Reaction score
17,496
Location
Spring, Texas
Possibly, what would ipcamtalk provide in exchange? To provide some further context, it costs money to provide the Calculator, most specifically Google Cloud Maps API charges (over $1,000 per month).
So the first five pros that pay for membership pay the Google charge for one month. So 60 members pay for the year. You must have way more than 60 members. You have provided it for free for all these years. What prompted the change now?

Personally I have found the views glitchy and the example plates and faces are not close to what I see on my cams. I have found it not all that helpful, really.

So if IPCAMTALK is not your company's interest, then why do you even bother coming here?
 

john-ipvm

Known around here
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
409
Reaction score
648
You have provided it for free for all these years. What prompted the change now?

...

So if IPCAMTALK is not your company's interest, then why do you even bother coming here?
I learn from feedback from various people.

As for not giving it away anymore, as you mentioned we did so for years and we still give 90 seconds but we want to reward those who value our work by paying for it.
 

Firefighter

Getting comfortable
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
158
Reaction score
250
Doesn't limiting the number of cameras for non members do exactly that? The reward for paying for IPVM is in addition to the information theres also an unlimited use of the calculator in multiple factors, Camera, Time, Information saved etc.

By limiting the number of cameras to 4 you did exactly that. Professionals can't do much of anything with 4 cameras on ipvm without the full access and information as you mentioned.

Oh well. What's the next best thing aside from ipvm for us homeowners?
There's gotta be another option that is open source.

I can't find my location and find a camera with 90 seconds. lol


I professionally installed alarms/cctv for 5 years and our company never used ipvm. You walk around with the client and basically can tell what you need.
You either need a 90* cam or a varifocal. We did both residential and commercial. I tried selling the boss on a ipvm subscription but couldn't.
 
Top