Need help understanding the difference between these cameras

Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Perth
I am looking to purchase some cameras for my home use. It will be used outdoors to capture up to 15 feet - mainly the side fence and front porch.

So after reading through many threads, it seems the sweet spot is a 4MP camera with 1/1.8" sensor -
The 2.8mm S3 version is currently unavailable. However, what is the difference between the 3.6mm and 6mm version?

Would the other versions still be suitable in my scenario?
 
As an Amazon Associate IPCamTalk earns from qualifying purchases.

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
25,124
Reaction score
48,958
Location
USA
The non-S3 version was the go to and still used by many people. If that is the only version you can get, it is still a great camera.

The 3.6mm versus 6mm version are the focal lengths. The smaller the number, the wider the field of view. The higher the number, the better the zoom.

At 15 feet I wouldn't use the 6mm.

See this great thread by @Ri22o demonstrating his journey on the focal lengths:

 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,588
Reaction score
48,907
Location
Floriduh
The 6mm is too much zoom for your area of 15ft
The 3.6mm may work, note the difference in FOV. The more you zoom, the less area you see

I personally use 3.6mm at both entrance doors, Fixed lens provide a slightly better image and better light pick up than variable focus lenses
15ft to the truck bumper and 15ft to the edge of the deck
Home_BackDoor-5442_main_20240401182241_@5.jpg Home_FrDoor-5442_main_20240401163838_@5.jpg

There is however a variable focus model of the same camera that would allow you to dial in your FOV but in such a small area it seems a waste


Focal Length2.8 mm; 3.6 mm; 6 mm
Max. ApertureF1.6
Field of View2.8 mm: H: 112°; V: 58°; D: 139°
3.6 mm: H: 88°; V: 50°; D: 102°
6 mm: H: 61°; V: 35°; D: 69°
Iris ControlFixed
Close Focus Distance2.8 mm: 1.3 m (4.27 ft)
3.6 mm: 1.5 m (4.92 ft)
6 mm: 3.0 m (9.84 ft)
DORI DistanceLensDetectObserveRecognizeIdentify
2.8 mm61.5 m (201.77 ft)24.6 m

(80.71 ft)
12.3 m

(40.35 ft)
6.2 m

(20.34 ft)
3.6 mm67.6 m (221.78 ft)27.0 m

(88.58 ft)
13.5 m

(44.29 ft)
6.8 m

(22.31 ft)
6 mm96.6 m (316.93 ft)38.6 m

(126.64 ft)
19.3 m

(63.32 ft)
9.7 m

(31.82 ft)
DORI (Detect, Observe, Recognize, Identify) is a standard system (EN-62676-4) for defining the ability of a person viewing the video to distinguish persons or objects within a covered area. The numbers in this table do not reflect intelligent function distances. For intelligent function distances, refer to installation and commissioning manual/project design tool.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Perth
Thanks for the clarification.

Come to think of it, both my side fences are about 40ft long. It is long but narrow. In this case, would the higher focal length like 6 mm be suitable?
 

observant1

Pulling my weight
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Messages
218
Reaction score
146
Location
alabama
This may not be applicable to your situation. Some cameras/nvrs have corridor mode. I's especially good for hallways. Not gonna help with 10ft to 40 ft length fence, but in the proper location it's a great feature to try out.
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,588
Reaction score
48,907
Location
Floriduh
And realize that if you zoom in to get a clear identifiable image at 40 ft, you won’t see anything from 0-15ft or so.

Typical case of trying to do too much with one camera.

Two cameras 6" apart
One is to watch over the driveway where my wife parks her jeep, the other is to get facial ID on the street. Cant do both with one camera

Home_Drive-5442H-ZHE_main_20240215083952_@5.jpg Home_5442-Z4-S3_main_20240215083953_@5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top