@catseyenu
I do not agree with you. The virtual hosting is major addition in the functionality of the NVR. If they add proper routing as well (which is only a software issue) then the NVR will be two devices in one, a router and an NVR.
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "... so I'm going from your test"
@nayr
You are right about the ideal way of setting up a surveilance system. Cameras connected to a PoE switch and the PoE switch and the NVR connected to a router. However the cost of the PoE switch is a considerable cost for a budget or residential surveillance plus the additional burden of extra devices to be managed.
The HIK NVR I have does not have any settings for a DHCP server, it only has one setting for defining the the "gateway" of the internal internal switch which is the first IP of an internal to the NVR subnet only for the cameras and only "visible" from the NVR. According to my understanding, there is an internal DHCP that assigns automatically IPs to the cameras, but this subnet is not routed externally to the NVR LAN port. That's why the cameras canot send email, cannot setup NTP and any other network activity. Lately they added port forwarding from the NVR LAN port to the cameras but not the othr way round.
I do not know if there is a NVR with such network functionality.
I would hope that someone would implement additionally in the NVR this internal routing from the cameras to the LAN.