Which would be fine if it actually worked properly.So I think they have been working on a "lite" system to better compete with the consumer based stuff out there.
I find reviewing video to be clunky and not as easy to zero in on specific times as in the non lite version.SmartPSS lite works fine for me as a homeowner. Prob even a small business.
Which would be fine if it actually worked properly.
Thanks. [Someone else] asked me and is looking for a modern XVR hybrid (coax and network cameras, doesnt have to have each network port). If anyone can link where to buy a modern Pentabrid (US rebrand), please say.These are the only places that are authorized by Dahua
I'm not looking for a payout, I'm looking for a correction (corrective action lawsuit). They already cost me time and safety. I have saved video expiring, which takes 3x longer to save clips using Smart Lite. They deliberately hired someone to remove features from Smart Lite (so they cannot claim that prior customers need to pay a fee to get the updated version of whatever SmartPSS should have been) - features removed to force existing owners to consider buying the subscription service. That is fraud and criminal conspiracy to obtain a racket.Doesn't mean you couldn't file a class action and who knows maybe win....about 25 bucks. These class action lawsuits never provide big payouts to the consumer.
It generally falls under fraud by deception, and for me, false advertising (at the point of purchase, certain features were advertised). Thus they cannot take them away merely because they want more money from "business" buyers. This is typical corporate greed. There's probably a whistleblower that has evidence of their meetings and discussion of why they purposely took out features for the newer Smart Lite.Can someone show me the law that says dahua must provide you with any software at all, let alone specific software products to access your nvr?
Q: Show me the law that says dahua must provide me any software at all, let alone specific software products to access your nvr, specifically on windows PC or android.
ChatGPT said: The legal obligation for a company like Dahua to provide software for accessing its products, such as an NVR (Network Video Recorder), typically falls under consumer protection laws, contractual agreements, and warranty terms. Here are a few points to consider:
- Contractual Obligations: When you purchase a product, you often agree to terms that may include access to specific software. If the terms of service or product specifications imply that the software is included, the company may be legally obligated to provide it.
- Consumer Protection Laws: Many states have laws that protect consumers from deceptive practices. If the software was advertised as part of the product, you might have grounds for a complaint if it’s not provided.
- Implied Warranty: Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), there is an implied warranty of merchantability, which may require that products sold function as reasonably expected, which could include software support. <<< those are the keywords.
- End-User License Agreement (EULA): This document usually outlines what software the company must provide and any limitations regarding its use.
I certainly wouldn't be taking legal advice from it.We can make AI say whatever narrative we want.
They have released an update fixing that connection issuei would hope not, but if you can determine the encryption used for the hashing it could potentially be unhashed.
The AI didnt give legal advice. Someone asked a question about what laws. I looked it up for them and the AI listed laws that could apply to MY situation.I certainly wouldn't be taking legal advice from it.
Thanks for your good luck wish. I will proceed. "Third party" etc are irrelevant to my case. I already stated that I bought from an authorized dealer. They cannot change the terms afterwards or claim I am excluded. That would be contract fraud.Good luck with the class action....if there were one it would likely exclude those purchased by 3rd party resellers.
If anything, a class action suit would probably result in these companies doing away with 3rd party resellers or limiting these programs to just those purchased from authorized distributors. That would be easy to do based on serial number.
ChatGPT also suggests adding glue to your pizza sauce to keep cheese on the pizza, so it may or may not be providing the correct response as it relates to purchasing an NVR from a 3rd party seller.
AI also says this:
View attachment 204644
We can make AI say whatever narrative we want.
And some Dahua distributors were posting language like this:
"have been informed that all new Dahua recorders have been upgraded to an increased secured Firmware. With this new Firmware all “Grey Market” cameras will risk being blocked and not compatible with the recorders. Both “Grey Market” recorders and cameras will thus be made redundant as they will become unusable and unsupported devices!"
For all we know the agreements 3rd party resellers have with Dahua may state this and we never see those agreements and the limitations were not enforced.
I have yet to hear of them actually blocking the grey market devices, but apparently they have the ability and legal right to do so.
You still have access to your device. It still works with other VMS systems. Unlike Ring that the second your subscription expires, so does reviewing recorded video.
Maybe @fenderman will chime in with his thoughts.