sebastiantombs
Known around here
I think Dan Bongino, or maybe Rumble, have a new payment system like PayPal. I'll look it up tomorrow if I can remember to.
PayPal
- Thread starter Ssayer
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
I’ve used Cash App a number of times. My daughter uses it for her cleaning business.
It’s FDIC insured, fast and easy. Been around since I think 2013?
It’s FDIC insured, fast and easy. Been around since I think 2013?
Vettester
Getting comfortable
- Feb 5, 2017
- 869
- 847
Smilingreen
Known around here
I bet PayPal sent out a shitload of these e-mails this weekend. As I was trying to close mine out yesterday, PayPal tries to entice me back with a $5.00 coupon. They just added gasoline to the fire by attempting to belittle us with a $5.00 digital nothing to come back. Never.
Smilingreen
Known around here
I wonder how many heads will roll at PayPal today?
This whole paypal fiasco is a great ad for bitcoin...
bigredfish
Known around here
PayPal Stock Fined 6% After Flood Of Users Cancel Over $2,500 'Misinformation' Debacle
www.zerohedge.com
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Hmm learned from the article that PayPal owns Vemno, so time to get rid of my bank that support that!
bigredfish
Known around here
sebastiantombs
Known around here
Bongino's payment processing is called "Parallel Economy" and is actually a credit card processor so it's not quite the same as PayPal. Although I think we all have debit cards from our banks that would serve for direct cash transfers using it to make it, basically, the equivalent in function.
Smilingreen
Known around here
currently 84.52......going down, down, down.......
Cancelled today during my lunch. It's insane that a company could destroy itself like this. These types of changes in terms are reviewed by teams of lawyers so there was no mistake in releasing this version of the terms. How could they be so dumb as to think this would not backfire?
bigredfish
Known around here
I actually thought the $2500 was less troublesome than the woke rules they are trying to implement. Effectively anything you say publicly that “offends” anyone in their definition has consequences from closing your account up to the fine and even holding all of your funds.
The fine wasn’t going to make it past the first court case anyway.
This is a preview of social credit scores.
Why Paypal thought they had enough horsepower to implement it is beyond rational thought.
The fine wasn’t going to make it past the first court case anyway.
This is a preview of social credit scores.
Why Paypal thought they had enough horsepower to implement it is beyond rational thought.
Smilingreen
Known around here
Luckily, I am not worried about "Social Credit Scores". I am old enough for it to not really affect me and I have not utilized my real name on the internet, ever. The younger generation, though. Let's face it, they're gonna be fucked.
BORIStheBLADE
Getting comfortable
The way I see it is with "involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials
that, in PayPal’s sole discretion,"
Don't you think they can blur the lines with any of these especially
(a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or
objectionable, (b) depict or appear to depict nudity, sexual or other intimate
activities, (c) depict or promote illegal drug use, (d) depict or promote violence,
criminal activity, cruelty, or self-harm (e) depict, promote, or incite hatred or
discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected
characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation,
etc.) (f) present a risk to user safety or wellbeing, (g) are fraudulent, promote
misinformation, or are unlawful, (h) infringe the privacy, intellectual property
rights, or other proprietary rights of any party, or (i) are otherwise unfit for
publication.
that, in PayPal’s sole discretion,"
Don't you think they can blur the lines with any of these especially
(a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or
objectionable, (b) depict or appear to depict nudity, sexual or other intimate
activities, (c) depict or promote illegal drug use, (d) depict or promote violence,
criminal activity, cruelty, or self-harm (e) depict, promote, or incite hatred or
discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected
characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation,
etc.) (f) present a risk to user safety or wellbeing, (g) are fraudulent, promote
misinformation, or are unlawful, (h) infringe the privacy, intellectual property
rights, or other proprietary rights of any party, or (i) are otherwise unfit for
publication.
Yup--- it's insane-- anybody can complain about you, and this private company acts as judge and jury and imposes fines??? What in the hell were they thinking?
PayPal Still Threatens $2500 Fines for Promoting "Discriminatory" "Intolerance" (Even if Not "Misinformation")
Yahoo! Finance (Adam Sabes) reported yesterday (as did many other sites): A new PayPal user agreement that threatens to fine users up to $2,500 if they
reason.com
