Ok -so I've been pouring over previous posts (Nayr, various others) and have been searching the web. There seem to be multiple camps on the notion of port-forwarding forwarding --- ranging from "it's bad!" to "it might be bad, but not sure," to "it could be bad but it is probably not," to "it isn't bad and don't believe the hype."
The camera companies and even installers seem to brush it off as hype. I'm not so naive that I believe everything I hear but I also wonder how much is hype? The common counter argument from vendors/installers is "there isn't really any damage someone can do with access to your DVR and cameras other than seeing your video."
I'm trying to sort out:
1) how truly bad is port forwarding a residential DVR - i.e. what is the realistic worse case scenario. Can someone really do much badness with DVR access? true risks in other words.
2) is there a way to make port forwarding "less bad?" -- or am I nuts for even considering port forwarding?
Full disclosure-my network skills are really low-tech, but I'm a pretty good installer with mad drywall skills and headphones.
Thanks
The camera companies and even installers seem to brush it off as hype. I'm not so naive that I believe everything I hear but I also wonder how much is hype? The common counter argument from vendors/installers is "there isn't really any damage someone can do with access to your DVR and cameras other than seeing your video."
I'm trying to sort out:
1) how truly bad is port forwarding a residential DVR - i.e. what is the realistic worse case scenario. Can someone really do much badness with DVR access? true risks in other words.
2) is there a way to make port forwarding "less bad?" -- or am I nuts for even considering port forwarding?
Full disclosure-my network skills are really low-tech, but I'm a pretty good installer with mad drywall skills and headphones.
Thanks