I don't think you guys are really reading what I'm writing. You keep telling me I need a fast shutter to get clear photos as if I'm disagreeing with you but I am not. As I have said before, I'm only interested in a high frame rate and smooth motion during the day when there's plenty of light and when I'm actively watching the camera. I'm not trying to show 30 fps video to the police, I don't know where you got that idea from, I'm watching the birds jump around in the bird feeder while I'm stuck inside all day and it's way nicer to see that at a high frame rate. In the middle of the day it doesn't matter whether you're on 8 fps or 50 fps, you can have a fast shutter speed and there's no motion blur because there's so much light, so I don't understand why you're all trying to convince me that 30 fps during the day is blasphemous.
As for night time, and especially for security purposes, clarity obviously takes precedence over everything else so I'm not, and have never been, asking for a high framerate at night. Again I am not sure where you are getting this idea from. You might be getting confused because originally when I was complaining about the camera not doing 25 fps, it was because it was dusk and I did not realise it was set to a variable frame rate option. I had assumed the frame rate I had set would be used regardless of light level. I didn't actually want 25 fps at night, I just didn't understand why the camera was not honouring the settings I had chosen. Now I understand what it is doing, the lower frame rate at night does not worry me. I am not interested in smooth motion at night as all the birds are asleep, but I am interested in a clear image of the public area a good distance behind the bird feeder where people sometimes approach at night.
I don't care if the night view is 1 fps as its purpose is to identify people so if I can make out faces at night then I am happy. The problem I have with the settings is that in order to avoid motion blur I need to use a short exposure time, but because there is not enough light in the scene the short exposure introduces a considerable amount of noise - so much that it's only slightly better than the longer exposure motion blurred version. In order to make it watchable I have to enable noise reduction, but even at low settings this very quickly removes the detail from people's faces as they are a relatively long distance from the camera. But all this is just because the scene is lit below what the camera can see, and the people are too far away from the camera, so I am not blaming the camera. The only option is to add more light which unfortunately isn't possible in my case. The Dahua already sees the night scene many times clearer than the previous camera I was using, it is still just not quite bright enough to make out faces at night.
As for stopping it from switching into IR mode, when you say you "simply" force it in colour for the night profile instead of using the auto option, you cannot do this as those options are disabled in the day/night mode - you can see here the grey colour means they are disabled and you cannot click on them.
So you have two choices - either automatic switching to a night profile based on light level, but at the expense of having it switch to IR mode at night, or colour-day and colour-night profiles, but you have to program in the schedule yourself, which means if it's a particularly overcast day it won't automatically switch to the night profile.
@wittaj you are right, I was not looking closely at how the schedule works and you can set twelve 24-hour schedules, one for each month of the year, so perhaps this is good enough.
It has been stated a few times already and this is the last time I will comment.
The firmware dropping to 20fps from 30fps is NOT slowing the shutter speed. Changing the frame rate has NOTHING to do with the amount of light that reaches the sensor. Only the shutter speed and the iris setting will change the amount of light reaching the sensor.
I am sorry I am not spelling everything out in detail, I thought it was clear what I was saying. When I say the camera is dropping the fps to let more light in, it is short hand for saying it it slowing down the shutter speed, so the shutter can stay open for longer, in order to let more light in, and as a result of the increased time to collect each frame, fewer frames can be collected each second requiring the frame rate to be lowered. If the shutter is running at 30 ms then you are grabbing one frame every 30 ms, which means you can only get 33.3 frames per second max. If you need to open the shutter for longer to let more light in, say for 50 ms, then you cannot keep collecting 30 frames per second - literally 50 milliseconds times 30 frames means it will take you 1.5 seconds to collect all those 30 frames. So in order to slow the shutter down to 50 ms, you have no choice but to drop the frame rate to 20 fps (50 ms * 20 fps = exactly 1 second). It is not possible to slow down the shutter beyond 33 ms while maintaining 30 fps, unless you duplicate frames in software which is inefficient. This is what I mean by the camera slowing down to 20 fps to collect more light - it is doing this because the AI algorithm is increasing the exposure time beyond 33 milliseconds, and rather than duplicate frames, it just returns fewer frames each second.
Yes you're technically correct that going from 30 fps to 20 fps does not slow the shutter speed, but slowing the shutter speed from 30 ms to 50 ms forces you to drop from 30 fps to 20 fps which is what I was referring to. Maybe it is sloppy on my part, I am just so used to cheap cameras that cannot have the exposure time set independently of the frame rate, and the only way to slow the shutter speed beyond a certain point is to set a lower frame rate.
EDIT: Just as an observation, I set the manual shutter to 33 ms and the camera happily delivers 30 fps. But once I increase the shutter to 50 ms, the camera automatically drops back to 20 fps, without me changing the frame rate settings. Likewise a 60 ms shutter causes it to drop to 17 fps. So the firmware is definitely lowering the framerate in order to meet the requirements of longer exposure times, as you would expect. Not that this matters to all you fast-shutter types, of course