Maybe this will be useful information since the question of Synology Surveillance Station vs Blue Iris comes up time to time. I've been going back and forth with Synology Sales & Support while considering a new Synology NAS to do double duty using Surveillance Station.
I, like others (I think), believed that a Synology NAS using Surveillance Station acted in the same manner as Blue Iris on a dedicated PC, but with lesser performance and features. My presumption was that is was a simple, low-cost alternative to BI for those needing/wanting to buy or upgrade their NAS anyway.
However, what I learned through a series of discussions with support is that Surveillance Station only writes the streams to disk (much like direct-to-disk for BI), but that the "live-view" feature used to monitor cameras in a matrix via a browser plugin gives the lions share of the load to the client device/PC. Worse, the existing live view plugin does NOT use hardware acceleration for decoding. Thus, the system requirments for using Surveillance Station to monitor & review (rather than just record) may exceed those for a dedicated BI setup with any system of more than just a few high-MP ipCams. There is even an FAQ discussing the system requirements for live-view that sales directed me to after some back-and-forth:
Surveillance Station - Knowledge Base | Synology Inc.
The system requirements in the chart are for a high number of low-MP cameras at 85% CPU load... this seems to be the typical Surveillance Station intended customer (lots of cameras recording to multiple NAS being viewed on multiple dedicated PCs running live view on IE with their Surveillance plugin)... a very enterprise solution. As far as performance of the live-view plugin...
"We are releasing a desktop client in the future (it's in beta now) that will offer better performance. Further into the future we are aiming for GPU acceleration for the desktop client as well."
Not even sure they're considering quick-sync use???
Having said all that, I'm not sure I see any advantage of Surveillance Station over BI for the typical home/small business system given the feature disparity and lack of any cost/simplicity advantage. And having said that, I still DO like my existing Synology NAS, but am no longer considering a much nicer one as an alternative to a dedicated BI PC.
I, like others (I think), believed that a Synology NAS using Surveillance Station acted in the same manner as Blue Iris on a dedicated PC, but with lesser performance and features. My presumption was that is was a simple, low-cost alternative to BI for those needing/wanting to buy or upgrade their NAS anyway.
However, what I learned through a series of discussions with support is that Surveillance Station only writes the streams to disk (much like direct-to-disk for BI), but that the "live-view" feature used to monitor cameras in a matrix via a browser plugin gives the lions share of the load to the client device/PC. Worse, the existing live view plugin does NOT use hardware acceleration for decoding. Thus, the system requirments for using Surveillance Station to monitor & review (rather than just record) may exceed those for a dedicated BI setup with any system of more than just a few high-MP ipCams. There is even an FAQ discussing the system requirements for live-view that sales directed me to after some back-and-forth:
Surveillance Station - Knowledge Base | Synology Inc.
The system requirements in the chart are for a high number of low-MP cameras at 85% CPU load... this seems to be the typical Surveillance Station intended customer (lots of cameras recording to multiple NAS being viewed on multiple dedicated PCs running live view on IE with their Surveillance plugin)... a very enterprise solution. As far as performance of the live-view plugin...
"We are releasing a desktop client in the future (it's in beta now) that will offer better performance. Further into the future we are aiming for GPU acceleration for the desktop client as well."
Not even sure they're considering quick-sync use???
Having said all that, I'm not sure I see any advantage of Surveillance Station over BI for the typical home/small business system given the feature disparity and lack of any cost/simplicity advantage. And having said that, I still DO like my existing Synology NAS, but am no longer considering a much nicer one as an alternative to a dedicated BI PC.