Teaser Info and Mini Review - Empiretech B52IR-X3 Triple Lens Camera

I had this grand plan to walk around with my laptop and Chrome Remote Desktop last night, but I was too tired and went to bed. I looked this morning and ended up with this capture, so not all was lost.

Any idea if I will get any better than this? Or should I keep making some tweaks? (It looks better now that I am posting it, than when I reviewed the footage)

PathSouth.20250620_220146015.56.jpg

Screenshot 2025-06-21 082755.png

Screenshot 2025-06-21 082816.png
 
I think you're actually starved for gain
 
I had this grand plan to walk around with my laptop and Chrome Remote Desktop last night, but I was too tired and went to bed. I looked this morning and ended up with this capture, so not all was lost.

Any idea if I will get any better than this? Or should I keep making some tweaks? (It looks better now that I am posting it, than when I reviewed the footage)

View attachment 223072

View attachment 223073

View attachment 223074
that looks better than any nighttime image from a ubuquiti camera
 
  • Like
Reactions: David L
So lower the exposure and increase the gain?

I am trying to get more detail in the faces, which I’m sure isn’t helped by the focus being several 10s of feet behind them. It’s too bad we can’t adjust that.

Yes. Worth a shot.
I rarely run less than 40 gain and often leave it at 50 or juice it to 60

I wish these had manual iris control
 
It looks great during the day. I have a few 2mp cameras in the back yard with the same lighting situation as the location as I was mentioning and even with the Tendelux D20 supplemental lighting, it could use more light at night.

I have a ZE in use that is mounted on the fence on a square pole with same terrible ambient lighting and it does so much better. Yeah, there is a hotspot in the middle, but I can't see the triple lens being too much different. And with the Z4E and ZE combined, there should be a good amount of IR.

I scour eBay on a regular basis for Empiretech cameras. I have never seen a used ZE, and I haven't seen a refurbished ZE on Andy's page either. So, I just purchased one new
 
Appreciate the heads up, but bad timing for me. I need to work out my network issue first. Don't want to add anymore equipment and have the nut across the street change settings on me or worse. Got to close the door on him first
 
Appreciate the heads up, but bad timing for me. I need to work out my network issue first. Don't want to add anymore equipment and have the nut across the street change settings on me or worse. Got to close the door on him first
It's already gone...
 
So glad I did not pull the trigger on the X3 with a max zoom of 25mm, because with the Z4E at 32mm the FOV isn't quite enough. I'm using a ZE and a Z4E in this location and both are at max zoom. The intersection is roughly 52 feet away from the camera. I would have thought 32mm would have been more than enough, guess not. Even the ZE needs a little more zoom.

I'm going to run it for a while and see if it needs improvement. I think I may eventually swap out the Z4E for a B12IR-Z12E, and run the Z4E as the overview
 

Attachments

  • LocustLynOvrvw1.jpg
    LocustLynOvrvw1.jpg
    797.3 KB · Views: 0
  • LocustLynZoom1.jpg
    LocustLynZoom1.jpg
    669.6 KB · Views: 0
Yea, I am happy with how the Z4Es are working for me in the path location, but do wish they had a little more than 32mm. It's definitely a trade off between the Z12E and Z4E. Additional zoom and 2MP/smaller sensor vs less zoom and 4MP/bigger sensor.

Are you sure that intersection is only 52' away? It looks further than that.

It is 66' to the middle of the path and this is what I am getting, I would think 32mm would be more than enough for your 52'.
Path, South 2025-07-09 11.50.13.715 AM.jpg
Path, North 2025-07-09 09.32.23.897 AM.jpg

This is about 50-52'.
Back_Gate 2025-07-09 01.39.16.451 PM.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clark Griswald
Sorry, I am mistaken. For some reason, I thought it was 52 feet, but it's 152 feet. What a dumbass I am. I don't know how I messed that up.

I like the idea of the 4mp sensor, but feel this location really needs more zoom for it to be effective for identity. As it stands, we're barely getting recognizable images. Going to have to be the Z12E to get identity images, I think.
 
Ok, how did you deduce that image? And the camera is on the corner post between the 2 properties - so it is roughly 152ish feet
I said don't ask how...

From other posts I know you're in Florida. I then assumed your camera name was the intersection, so I took some of the mailbox numbers I could read and just guessed which street they were on. I searched in Google Maps until I found a result that had that intersection.

That corner is better than the other one then, but probably still too far for the Z4E. I thought it was the one above based on your neighbor post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
That corner is better than the other one then, but probably still too far for the Z4E. I thought it was the one above based on your neighbor post.
Yeah, I think I will have to use a Z12E. My PTZ camera, just behind the post you show has a focal distance of 5 - 64mm (pretty much the same as the Z12E) and at max zoom I get the following captures of the intersection. Since it will be on the closer corner post, it should do well there
 

Attachments

  • NVR_Lynbrook SPTZ_main_20250328145326_@3.jpg
    NVR_Lynbrook SPTZ_main_20250328145326_@3.jpg
    617.2 KB · Views: 0