Hi guys,
Here it goes,
I received for a testing purpose 2 cam´s. It should replace my children's room ptz cam.
Some comments and thoughts about that can be found here. To say it directly, I am no friend of dome cams. There are to much negative points of the dome, p.e. ir clouding in the dome, daylight reflections. Unfortunately these ones are not build with audio out/alarm in/out. So if you need this, you must chose a dome version.
Both cams are easy available in Europe/Germany. Although these are no starlight versions I want to see if they are reliable. I also have a HDW5231E-Z, so i know it´s nearly impossible to beat this perfectly performing cam...
The first one is a cheap IPC-HDBW4431EP-AS 2,8mm (104°) and the second one is much more expensive (nearly twice), IPC-HDBW5431E-Z. Both cams have audio in and out, the feature set is nearly the same, except the objective, which is on paper better with the zoom version. The IR Led´s are also different but both are with 30m classified.
The datasheed says:
HDBW4431:
Lens Type Fixed
Focal Length 3.6mm (2.8mm, 6mm optional)
Max. Aperture F2.0 (F2.0. F2.0)
Angle of View H: 87° (104°, 55°), V: 48° (57°, 31°)
Optical Zoom N/A Focus Control Fixed
Close Focus Distance N/A
HDBW5431:
Lens Type Motorized/ Auto Iris(DC)
Mount Type Board-in
Focal Length 2.7mm~12mm
Max. Aperture F1.4
Angle of View H: 100°~35° , V:54°~20°
Optical Zoom4x
Focus Control Motorized
Close Focus Distance 0.3m
On the paper this means, that the zoom version has two times more light available and minimum illuminations is a bit better (HBDW5431 with 0.03Lux/F1.4 (Color); 0Lux/F1.4 (IR on) vs HDBW4431 0.08Lux/F2.0 (Color), 0Lux/F2.0 (IR on))
Lets look on some pictures and comments:
As you can see, the size is really different. The mini dome is really mini. And here i can notice the first disadvantage of the mini dome:
- All I/O are fixed. In case of using a public fitting it´s really difficult to put all in the fitting.
- The zoom one has connectors inside. Fine if you didn´t need everything, But not easy to connect audio.
- A big difference is the heat dissipation! The big dome has been in ir mode less cooler than the mini dome. The mini dome will always be hand warm.
A closer look brings another disadvantage, or lets better say a design problem of ip67:
You can see an open hole! This is the cable outlet. The Zoom Version is 100% ip67 rated, it has a removable silicon hole filler. Why did dahua miss this for the hdbw4431?!?
The IR Leds:
Normally I see advantages for high power leds. Previously i thought the 5431 has much more IR power, because of the third led and more power rated. (12,5W! compared to <5W) And yes it rates it really because my 1,5A power supply will not work 100% with it, although it should. My 15W POE works fine.
One interesting difference to the pics from dahua are the lens shades of the 5431. You can see one spot angle and 2 wide angle leds. This looks as a very good idea. ( A surprise will come !)
On the pictures you can see a good working ir rubber ring on the lens. This is working nearly perfect and prevents the ir light to gives cloud effects to the night view picture. But be aware of going to deep with the lens. It must have all around contact with the dome glass. If not you will notice cloud effects!
With this modification compared to other cheap manufacture of dome cams one dome disadvantage is minimised.
Anyway, it can not prevent side light effect of reflections on the dome glass outside. But the lens is really near to the glass, it´s not that much as expected!
Quality and Inside differences:
The big one is totally different inside. Here i found an analogue video out, and a secure lock cable of the dome. Reopening it is save when you works not on a table...
Both cams have a reset button (i love it) and the 5431 looks all including more qualitative.
When the lens is compared, you see that the Zoom one is nearly double sized, therefore it can pass more light. But it has more lens compared to a fixed focus for zoom and focusing. Does it really gives more light like the datasheet says?
Lets compare the still picture quality:
Both cams are at maximum vbr bitrate, everything else is default. The ambient light is not very much. But its enough to have full details.
starting with the HDBW5431
4MP focus 520 2MP focus 520 4MP 2MP
now HDBW4431
I can´t see no detail difference although the bigger angle of view. And what I really did not expected, for the short distance the IR of HDBW4431 performs very well! You see a better coverage and in the center the picture is not over lighted. Surprise, Surprise. The cheaper cam is beating a much expensiver one.
Comparing 4MP mode to 2mp in night view shows although i use the better focus point slightly better details.
At day time its more noticeable:
Of course, this is an indoor shooting. Outdoor I am sure, when the field view is smaller and zoomed in, a 5431 one will be much better performing.
@all:
I will try my best, although nayr´s testrounds are much more i can give
Here it goes,
I received for a testing purpose 2 cam´s. It should replace my children's room ptz cam.
Some comments and thoughts about that can be found here. To say it directly, I am no friend of dome cams. There are to much negative points of the dome, p.e. ir clouding in the dome, daylight reflections. Unfortunately these ones are not build with audio out/alarm in/out. So if you need this, you must chose a dome version.
Both cams are easy available in Europe/Germany. Although these are no starlight versions I want to see if they are reliable. I also have a HDW5231E-Z, so i know it´s nearly impossible to beat this perfectly performing cam...
The first one is a cheap IPC-HDBW4431EP-AS 2,8mm (104°) and the second one is much more expensive (nearly twice), IPC-HDBW5431E-Z. Both cams have audio in and out, the feature set is nearly the same, except the objective, which is on paper better with the zoom version. The IR Led´s are also different but both are with 30m classified.
The datasheed says:
HDBW4431:
Lens Type Fixed
Focal Length 3.6mm (2.8mm, 6mm optional)
Max. Aperture F2.0 (F2.0. F2.0)
Angle of View H: 87° (104°, 55°), V: 48° (57°, 31°)
Optical Zoom N/A Focus Control Fixed
Close Focus Distance N/A
HDBW5431:
Lens Type Motorized/ Auto Iris(DC)
Mount Type Board-in
Focal Length 2.7mm~12mm
Max. Aperture F1.4
Angle of View H: 100°~35° , V:54°~20°
Optical Zoom4x
Focus Control Motorized
Close Focus Distance 0.3m
On the paper this means, that the zoom version has two times more light available and minimum illuminations is a bit better (HBDW5431 with 0.03Lux/F1.4 (Color); 0Lux/F1.4 (IR on) vs HDBW4431 0.08Lux/F2.0 (Color), 0Lux/F2.0 (IR on))
Lets look on some pictures and comments:
As you can see, the size is really different. The mini dome is really mini. And here i can notice the first disadvantage of the mini dome:
- All I/O are fixed. In case of using a public fitting it´s really difficult to put all in the fitting.
- The zoom one has connectors inside. Fine if you didn´t need everything, But not easy to connect audio.
- A big difference is the heat dissipation! The big dome has been in ir mode less cooler than the mini dome. The mini dome will always be hand warm.
A closer look brings another disadvantage, or lets better say a design problem of ip67:
You can see an open hole! This is the cable outlet. The Zoom Version is 100% ip67 rated, it has a removable silicon hole filler. Why did dahua miss this for the hdbw4431?!?
The IR Leds:
Normally I see advantages for high power leds. Previously i thought the 5431 has much more IR power, because of the third led and more power rated. (12,5W! compared to <5W) And yes it rates it really because my 1,5A power supply will not work 100% with it, although it should. My 15W POE works fine.
One interesting difference to the pics from dahua are the lens shades of the 5431. You can see one spot angle and 2 wide angle leds. This looks as a very good idea. ( A surprise will come !)
On the pictures you can see a good working ir rubber ring on the lens. This is working nearly perfect and prevents the ir light to gives cloud effects to the night view picture. But be aware of going to deep with the lens. It must have all around contact with the dome glass. If not you will notice cloud effects!
With this modification compared to other cheap manufacture of dome cams one dome disadvantage is minimised.
Anyway, it can not prevent side light effect of reflections on the dome glass outside. But the lens is really near to the glass, it´s not that much as expected!
Quality and Inside differences:
The big one is totally different inside. Here i found an analogue video out, and a secure lock cable of the dome. Reopening it is save when you works not on a table...
Both cams have a reset button (i love it) and the 5431 looks all including more qualitative.
When the lens is compared, you see that the Zoom one is nearly double sized, therefore it can pass more light. But it has more lens compared to a fixed focus for zoom and focusing. Does it really gives more light like the datasheet says?
Lets compare the still picture quality:
Both cams are at maximum vbr bitrate, everything else is default. The ambient light is not very much. But its enough to have full details.
starting with the HDBW5431
4MP focus 520 2MP focus 520 4MP 2MP
now HDBW4431
I can´t see no detail difference although the bigger angle of view. And what I really did not expected, for the short distance the IR of HDBW4431 performs very well! You see a better coverage and in the center the picture is not over lighted. Surprise, Surprise. The cheaper cam is beating a much expensiver one.
Comparing 4MP mode to 2mp in night view shows although i use the better focus point slightly better details.
At day time its more noticeable:
Of course, this is an indoor shooting. Outdoor I am sure, when the field view is smaller and zoomed in, a 5431 one will be much better performing.
@all:
I will try my best, although nayr´s testrounds are much more i can give
Last edited: