Unifi AI Port- Works great!

Is this working with the EmpireTech IPC-B52IR-Z12E-S2 (IPC-HFW5241E-Z12E) running the latest firmware?
Correct; AI Port treats every ONVIF device the same
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: quiet.tea
Is this working with the EmpireTech IPC-B52IR-Z12E-S2 (IPC-HFW5241E-Z12E) running the latest firmware?
I have this same albeit older camera (IPC-HFW5241E-Z12E) streamed to Blue Iris and now also to Protest, and the AI Port is using it to tag plates and people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
Nice! How many ONVIF devices can it support at this moment? Also, is there still an issue with the capture of plates after dark?
That was a surprise to me when I got the AI Port, that it need not even be connected to a camera, it just needed to be on the network. I have 4 ONVIF cameras as well as the G4 on the Protect. The use of plate collection, though, is weak even during the day. My Z12 is also on Blue Iris, and I have a Rekor account for collecting plates, and the Rekor captures most while the AI Port can miss maybe half. The AI Port would be useful for a business where the camera is directly in front of the cars, say, in a corporate parking lot. But for LPR, I am staying with BI and Rekor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
That was a surprise to me when I got the AI Port, that it need not even be connected to a camera, it just needed to be on the network. I have 4 ONVIF cameras as well as the G4 on the Protect. The use of plate collection, though, is weak even during the day. My Z12 is also on Blue Iris, and I have a Rekor account for collecting plates, and the Rekor captures most while the AI Port can miss maybe half. The AI Port would be useful for a business where the camera is directly in front of the cars, say, in a corporate parking lot. But for LPR, I am staying with BI and Rekor.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I was contemplating buying one but I'll have to pass for now if it is only capturing half the plates compared to the Rekor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
I ordered the AI Port to evaluate its performance and paired it with an Axis P1468-LE 4K camera. Vehicle, person, and license plate recognition work very well, but face and animal detection leave a lot to be desired. One thing that really surprised me is that the maximum supported recording bitrate is capped at just 8 Mbps (see "Video compression" in the attached screenshot), while the camera actually streams at 20–30 Mbps. Is this a bug on my end, or are others experiencing the same limitation? Overall, I'm quite happy with the product, but this could be a dealbreaker for me.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-03-31 at 14.00.26.png
    Screenshot 2025-03-31 at 14.00.26.png
    219.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
It also seems that the AI Port itself can’t process a stream at 20 to 30 Mbps. I hadn’t noticed it at first, but after reviewing some of the recordings, I realized that many of them have brief skips—usually missing about a second of video. I compared them to recordings made at the same time by Blue Iris, and those didn’t show the same issue.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Arjun
It also seems that the AI Port itself can’t process a stream at 20 to 30 Mbps. I hadn’t noticed it at first, but after reviewing some of the recordings, I realized that many of them have brief skips—usually missing about a second of video. I compared them to recordings made at the same time by Blue Iris, and those didn’t show the same issue.
I can imagine plates just slipping through the cracks due to bad bitrate :( Thanks for pointing that out
 
License plate recognition has actually worked really well for me with Dutch plates. I reached out to Ubiquiti because I find it hard to believe that the AI Port only supports an 8 Mbps output stream—it seems more like a bug to me. Unfortunately, their support hasn’t been very helpful so far.

I was hoping someone else here has tested a 4K camera and managed to get higher bitrates. Anyone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: quiet.tea and Arjun