Oceanslider
Known around here
a feminist follows the money…
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
bigredfish
Known around here
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Good find, great watch. Now I am understanding more of why the big push for Trans-People. Sure all of this is Anti-God, but even more so since Trans-Sexualism is pushed by the world's Elites to set the stage for the future Trans-Humanism movement. Makes perfect sense, the push is to normalize the changing of the human body. People will except it like they do Gay Marriage and other perversions. Look how many ran to the Clot Shot.
What do most of our youth watch/play in Games, Movies and TV shows; Super Humans. I see Trans-Humanism to be pushed in a positive light to improve your body and minds, like the vaccine was pushed.
The Elite's goal? Once they implant Trans-Humanism robotic parts they will have control of humans.
I know this sounds like it is out of a sci-fi fiction book but for me it makes perfect sense in establishing a One World Government.
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Sounds like China/North Korea
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
bigredfish
Known around here
China And Brazil Strike Deal To Ditch The US Dollar
www.zerohedge.com
Alas, at the rate the current US ruling regime is destroying the world's faith and confidence not only in the dollar but in what was once truly a superpower and is increasingly a third world banana republic - the latest news of Trump's indictment for political reasons being the third world cherry on top - we won't have very long to wait.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Alas, at the rate the current US ruling regime is destroying the world's faith and confidence not only in the dollar but in what was once truly a superpower and is increasingly a third world banana republic - the latest news of Trump's indictment for political reasons being the third world cherry on top - we won't have very long to wait.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
These proposed laws written by a democrapt are very similar to China’s current laws, no?
This is like the 60's and early 70's. The roles are reversed though, as us oldsters still are against war.
It seems like the younger crowd insist on war, be internal or external.
It is easy to understand the hoof beats of a "Red Hoarse".
It seems like the younger crowd insist on war, be internal or external.
It is easy to understand the hoof beats of a "Red Hoarse".
Parley
Known around here
"I believe that Trump's lawyers have accidently stumbled upon an obscure legal loophole that will be used in his defense.
The loophole is that a person cannot be convicted of something that is not a crime."
The loophole is that a person cannot be convicted of something that is not a crime."
Parley
Known around here
Turley: Trump Indictment ‘Legally Pathetic’
Thursday, during an appearance on Fox News Channel, law professor Jonathan Turley criticized the merits of the Manhattan grand jury’s indictment of former President Donald Trump.
Turley deemed the indictment “legally pathetic.”
“It is, it’s historic, it’s not necessarily good history that it is being made,” he said. “It’s not that I oppose the indictment of a former president. I don’t even oppose the indictment of a sitting president on a constitutional basis. But this indictment, if it is reportedly following the theory that we’ve been talking about is political. It’s a raw political prosecution. Now, the indictment may come out with a crime that none of us have heard of. But for many months, this bootstrapping theory has been put out there. This idea that you could take a misdemeanor under New York law that has expired that has a two-year statute of limitations and revive it by connecting it to a federal crime, in this case, the Federal Election violation.”
Turley: Trump Indictment 'Legally Pathetic' (breitbart.com)
Thursday, during an appearance on Fox News Channel, law professor Jonathan Turley criticized the merits of the Manhattan grand jury’s indictment of former President Donald Trump.
Turley deemed the indictment “legally pathetic.”
“It is, it’s historic, it’s not necessarily good history that it is being made,” he said. “It’s not that I oppose the indictment of a former president. I don’t even oppose the indictment of a sitting president on a constitutional basis. But this indictment, if it is reportedly following the theory that we’ve been talking about is political. It’s a raw political prosecution. Now, the indictment may come out with a crime that none of us have heard of. But for many months, this bootstrapping theory has been put out there. This idea that you could take a misdemeanor under New York law that has expired that has a two-year statute of limitations and revive it by connecting it to a federal crime, in this case, the Federal Election violation.”
Turley: Trump Indictment 'Legally Pathetic' (breitbart.com)
Parley
Known around here
Dershowitz on Trump Indictment: 'Worst Case of Prosecutorial Abuse I Have Ever Seen'
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz says the indictment of Donald Trump is the “worst case of prosecutorial abuse I have ever seen.” And he’s not the only one calling out this raw exercise of political power over the rule of law. Thursday night, Trump’s attorney echoed that sentiment, declaring, “today the rule of law in the United States of America died.”
Trump was charged in a sealed indictment handed up on Thursday that is believed to concern a non-disclosure agreement signed by porn actress Stormy Daniels, which the legacy media calls “hush money.” Daniels was paid $130,000 by Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen. Both Cohen and Daniels have declared that Trump didn’t make the payment himself and that there was no personal relationship in 2006 between Trump and the x-rated porn actress. Daniels has since reneged on her statement and, of course, the NDA.
Dershowitz said on the Sean Hannity program on Fox News that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is playing with fire.
[W]hen you’re a democratic elected prosecutor who ran on the campaign pledge of getting Trump and you’re going to indict, forget about the former president, the man who may become the future president if he beats the incumbent who is the head of your political party. Posecutor, you’d better have the strongest case imaginable, not a case that depends on stitching together two inapplicable statutes and using Michael Cohen.
Dershowitz has often said that a “first-year law student could win this case.”
The Harvard Law School professor emeritus told The Epoch Times, “In 60 years of practice, this is the worst case of prosecutorial abuse I have ever seen.”
Dershowitz on Trump Indictment: 'Worst Case of Prosecutorial Abuse I Have Ever Seen' – PJ Media
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz says the indictment of Donald Trump is the “worst case of prosecutorial abuse I have ever seen.” And he’s not the only one calling out this raw exercise of political power over the rule of law. Thursday night, Trump’s attorney echoed that sentiment, declaring, “today the rule of law in the United States of America died.”
Trump was charged in a sealed indictment handed up on Thursday that is believed to concern a non-disclosure agreement signed by porn actress Stormy Daniels, which the legacy media calls “hush money.” Daniels was paid $130,000 by Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen. Both Cohen and Daniels have declared that Trump didn’t make the payment himself and that there was no personal relationship in 2006 between Trump and the x-rated porn actress. Daniels has since reneged on her statement and, of course, the NDA.
Dershowitz said on the Sean Hannity program on Fox News that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is playing with fire.
[W]hen you’re a democratic elected prosecutor who ran on the campaign pledge of getting Trump and you’re going to indict, forget about the former president, the man who may become the future president if he beats the incumbent who is the head of your political party. Posecutor, you’d better have the strongest case imaginable, not a case that depends on stitching together two inapplicable statutes and using Michael Cohen.
Dershowitz has often said that a “first-year law student could win this case.”
The Harvard Law School professor emeritus told The Epoch Times, “In 60 years of practice, this is the worst case of prosecutorial abuse I have ever seen.”
Dershowitz on Trump Indictment: 'Worst Case of Prosecutorial Abuse I Have Ever Seen' – PJ Media
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
BREAKING: Pro-Trump Meme Maker Douglass Mackey, a.k.a. 'Ricky Vaughn,' Found GUILTY of Trolling Hillary Clinton During 2016 Election - Faces 10 Years in Prison | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Pro-Trump meme maker Douglass Mackey, AKA, Ricky Vaughn, was found guilty for trolling Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
www.thegatewaypundit.com