Sybertiger
Known around here
We are truly fucked. The left thinks they are in paradise with their leftist bullshit. They don't realize they are fucked too.
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
Interesting. Putting big puzzle pieces together…
ESG Dystopia: Why Corporations Are Doubling Down On Woke Even As They Lose Billions
www.zerohedge.com
ESG Dystopia: Why Corporations Are Doubling Down On Woke Even As They Lose Billions
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Parley
Known around here
Trump did not violate the law because he could not violate the law
Those conservatives rightly outraged at the Trump indictment keep comparing his treatment to that given to Hillary, Biden, and Pence, each of whom admitted to violating national security laws. That’s the wrong argument because Trump is not similarly situated to those lawbreakers. Instead, because he was president when he took possession of the documents, Trump cannot be guilty of the crimes with which he’s charged.
It starts with the Constitution, which created three equal branches of government: The legislative branch (Art. I), the executive (presidential) branch (Art. II), and the judiciary (Art. III). As part of his authority as the nation’s chief executive, the Art II president is also commander-in-chief of the military.
There are three analytical strands at work here. First, as Conservative Tree House explains, the Espionage Act of 1917, which is the basis for the charges against Trump, was enacted long before the document classification scheme began in 1951. CTH notes that isn’t arguing that the documents were classified; it’s arguing that the documents in Trump’s possession are “vital to the defense security of the United States.”
Mark Wauck sums up the problem:
Trump did not violate the law because he could not violate the law - American Thinker
Those conservatives rightly outraged at the Trump indictment keep comparing his treatment to that given to Hillary, Biden, and Pence, each of whom admitted to violating national security laws. That’s the wrong argument because Trump is not similarly situated to those lawbreakers. Instead, because he was president when he took possession of the documents, Trump cannot be guilty of the crimes with which he’s charged.
It starts with the Constitution, which created three equal branches of government: The legislative branch (Art. I), the executive (presidential) branch (Art. II), and the judiciary (Art. III). As part of his authority as the nation’s chief executive, the Art II president is also commander-in-chief of the military.
There are three analytical strands at work here. First, as Conservative Tree House explains, the Espionage Act of 1917, which is the basis for the charges against Trump, was enacted long before the document classification scheme began in 1951. CTH notes that isn’t arguing that the documents were classified; it’s arguing that the documents in Trump’s possession are “vital to the defense security of the United States.”
Mark Wauck sums up the problem:
Second, the real issue in the indictment is whether Trump correctly handled documents under the Presidential Records Act, which is not a criminal violation (h/t Mark Wauck):
Trump did not violate the law because he could not violate the law - American Thinker
ESG why? Simply the Revelation found in REV 13:17 being true! Are you familiar with AWS (Amazon Web Service)?
The Gospel may be found in verses 1-4! No "Dunkin' donuts", give XX %, show-up every X day, throw salt over
one's shoulder, no, nothing but 1 Cor 1-4.
Just pray for the preyers and hope they TURN THEMSELVES around!
The Gospel may be found in verses 1-4! No "Dunkin' donuts", give XX %, show-up every X day, throw salt over
one's shoulder, no, nothing but 1 Cor 1-4.
1 Corinthians 15:1 - The Resurrection of Christ
Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, and in which you stand firm.
biblehub.com
Just pray for the preyers and hope they TURN THEMSELVES around!
Billions waiting to manipulate elections and the minds of the gullible...
From the National Review:
The editorial board for The National Review said one cannot read the allegations outlined in the federal indictment against former President Trump and “not be appalled.”
The editorial board said in a post on Saturday that it has in the past pointed out times that it believes Trump’s opponents have manipulated the law to pursue politically motivated legal claims against him. It added that the members of the board do not like the precedent of a federal prosecutor who serves under the president indicting the president’s lead rival for reelection.
“That said, it is impossible to read the indictment against Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents case and not be appalled at the way he handled classified documents as an ex-president, and responded to the attempt by federal authorities to reclaim them,” the editorial states.
The board for the conservative news outlet noted that many of the boxes that Trump had moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago at the end of his presidency only contained newspaper clippings, photos, cards and letters, but they also included hundreds of documents with classified markings.
The information on the documents covered information relating to U.S. nuclear programs, defense capabilities, vulnerabilities and plans for potential retaliatory action in the event of an attack from another country, according to the indictment.
The board said Trump no longer had a right to possess these documents after his term ended, and he stored them “recklessly” in locations like his bedroom, a bathroom and a ballroom at Mar-a-Lago. It also mentioned federal prosecutors’ allegations that Trump ignored requests for the documents to be returned for months and attempted to keep investigators from obtaining the documents he had.
The editorial board argued the “most damning” part of the indictment is the transcript of the conversation Trump had in which he showed one document to a reporter who was not authorized to see it.
“Equally damning, particularly for someone who was and would like again to be the nation’s chief executive, responsible for the enforcement of the laws, is the evidence that Trump not only deceived the investigators and the grand jury, but his own lawyers — knowing and intending that they would consequently obstruct the investigation,” the editorial states.
The indictment alleges that Trump had an aide, who has also been indicted, move boxes of documents away from a storage room when one of his attorneys came to Mar-a-Lago to confirm that the subpoena was being fully complied with. This caused his legal team to wrongly tell investigators that all documents had been turned over.
The board said it understands conservatives might be frustrated with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not facing charges for her use of a private email server while serving and that President Biden might not face charges for his own alleged mishandling of some classified documents.
“But it doesn’t change the fact the country wouldn’t be in this uncharted territory if Trump hadn’t taken documents he had no right to, and simply complied when asked to give them back,” the editorial concludes.
The board previously declared in November that it would reject Trump as a choice for the Republican nomination for president in 2024.
The editorial board for The National Review said one cannot read the allegations outlined in the federal indictment against former President Trump and “not be appalled.”
The editorial board said in a post on Saturday that it has in the past pointed out times that it believes Trump’s opponents have manipulated the law to pursue politically motivated legal claims against him. It added that the members of the board do not like the precedent of a federal prosecutor who serves under the president indicting the president’s lead rival for reelection.
“That said, it is impossible to read the indictment against Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents case and not be appalled at the way he handled classified documents as an ex-president, and responded to the attempt by federal authorities to reclaim them,” the editorial states.
The board for the conservative news outlet noted that many of the boxes that Trump had moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago at the end of his presidency only contained newspaper clippings, photos, cards and letters, but they also included hundreds of documents with classified markings.
The information on the documents covered information relating to U.S. nuclear programs, defense capabilities, vulnerabilities and plans for potential retaliatory action in the event of an attack from another country, according to the indictment.
The board said Trump no longer had a right to possess these documents after his term ended, and he stored them “recklessly” in locations like his bedroom, a bathroom and a ballroom at Mar-a-Lago. It also mentioned federal prosecutors’ allegations that Trump ignored requests for the documents to be returned for months and attempted to keep investigators from obtaining the documents he had.
The editorial board argued the “most damning” part of the indictment is the transcript of the conversation Trump had in which he showed one document to a reporter who was not authorized to see it.
“Equally damning, particularly for someone who was and would like again to be the nation’s chief executive, responsible for the enforcement of the laws, is the evidence that Trump not only deceived the investigators and the grand jury, but his own lawyers — knowing and intending that they would consequently obstruct the investigation,” the editorial states.
The indictment alleges that Trump had an aide, who has also been indicted, move boxes of documents away from a storage room when one of his attorneys came to Mar-a-Lago to confirm that the subpoena was being fully complied with. This caused his legal team to wrongly tell investigators that all documents had been turned over.
The board said it understands conservatives might be frustrated with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not facing charges for her use of a private email server while serving and that President Biden might not face charges for his own alleged mishandling of some classified documents.
“But it doesn’t change the fact the country wouldn’t be in this uncharted territory if Trump hadn’t taken documents he had no right to, and simply complied when asked to give them back,” the editorial concludes.
The board previously declared in November that it would reject Trump as a choice for the Republican nomination for president in 2024.
All I can say for "someone". 1Timothy 4 1-4
Good luck on one's opinion of President Trump!
Good luck on one's opinion of President Trump!
1 Timothy 4:1 - Warnings against False Teachers
Now the Spirit expressly states that in later times some will abandon the faith to follow deceitful spirits and the teachings of demons,
biblehub.com
Parley
Known around here
Obviously, the National Review Editorial board did not review The Presidential Records Act. Also, the "board" may not like some things being that they are now lefties, but that does not mean any laws were broken. The reason the country is in uncharted territory is because the Biden administration is going after President Trump by any means possible to keep him from running for President in 2024. Biden and the Democrats also have the backing of some RINOs. This is nothing but pure politics. Simple as that.
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
The National Review is a bunch of washed up RINOs who are actually more pathetic than liberals
If it were up to Bill Barr, President Trump would already be found guilty and in Club Fed:
www.foxnews.com
Bill Barr says Trump's indictment is 'very damning' if 'even half of it is true'
Bill Barr says former President Donald Trump may be "toast" if the indictment against him is true. Barr described the document as "very very damning."
www.foxnews.com
Parley
Known around here
If it were up to Bill Barr, President Trump would already be found guilty and in Club Fed:
Bill Barr says Trump's indictment is 'very damning' if 'even half of it is true'
Bill Barr says former President Donald Trump may be "toast" if the indictment against him is true. Barr described the document as "very very damning."
Barr outed himself some time ago as a member of the deep state.
Well damn, I might have to start watching the Texas Rangers. The rest of professional sports can kiss my ass. My brother watches and says Rangers are looking good so far.
texasscorecard.com
Texas Rangers Refuse to Celebrate ‘Pride Month’ - Texas Scorecard
The Texas Rangers are the only Major League Baseball team refusing to give into pressure and publicly schedule a “Pride night.”
texasscorecard.com
I follow the Twins and the Vikings too-- I'm a glutton for punishment. I had to look-- they have Pride night on July 15th.Well damn, I might have to start watching the Texas Rangers. The rest of professional sports can kiss my ass. My brother watches and says Rangers are looking good so far.
Texas Rangers Refuse to Celebrate ‘Pride Month’ - Texas Scorecard
The Texas Rangers are the only Major League Baseball team refusing to give into pressure and publicly schedule a “Pride night.”
It figures though-- they play at TARGET FIELD.
Parley
Known around here
Senator Says There’s Audio Recordings Proving Joe and Hunter Biden Took Bribes
Senator Chuck Grassley took to the Senate floor today claiming the foreign national who allegedly bribed both Joe and Hunter Biden has a stunning 17 different recordings of conversations with the pair, kept as a form of “insurance policy.” “The foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them. 17 such recordings,” Grassley said on Monday. “According to the 1023 the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls between him and Hunter Biden. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then Vice President Joe Biden.” “These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national.” The comments are related to the $5M bribery allegation against President Joe Biden, stemming from when he was Vice President and his son Hunter was a lobbyist believed to be selling access to the U.S. government through his father. WATCH:
Senator Reveals 'Recordings' Proving Joe and Hunter Biden Took Bribes. (thenationalpulse.com)
Comment: I am sure that the media and the RINO Republicans will get right on it. Here is a real crime at the highest level and it will be ignored. This is how far down the sewer this country has gone.
Senator Chuck Grassley took to the Senate floor today claiming the foreign national who allegedly bribed both Joe and Hunter Biden has a stunning 17 different recordings of conversations with the pair, kept as a form of “insurance policy.” “The foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them. 17 such recordings,” Grassley said on Monday. “According to the 1023 the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls between him and Hunter Biden. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then Vice President Joe Biden.” “These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national.” The comments are related to the $5M bribery allegation against President Joe Biden, stemming from when he was Vice President and his son Hunter was a lobbyist believed to be selling access to the U.S. government through his father. WATCH:
Senator Reveals 'Recordings' Proving Joe and Hunter Biden Took Bribes. (thenationalpulse.com)
Comment: I am sure that the media and the RINO Republicans will get right on it. Here is a real crime at the highest level and it will be ignored. This is how far down the sewer this country has gone.
Last edited:
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Since 1972 , most purchases by the biden and his family have been paid in cash. That 5 million is a drop in the bucket.
bigredfish
Known around here
Lucy, you ga su splainin' to do...
Burisma Owner Allegedly Recorded Biden Bribe Convos As 'Insurance Policy' -- And FBI Covered Up: Grassley
Burisma Owner Allegedly Recorded Biden Bribe Convos As 'Insurance Policy' -- And FBI Covered Up: Grassley | ZeroHedge
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Monday dropped yet another bombshell in the recent spate of Biden corruption headlines - that the foreign national who allegedly bribed then-VP Joe Biden kept seventeen secret recordings of both Hunter and Joe Biden as an 'insurance' policy.
According to the Washington Examiner, that foreign national is Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky.
Two of the recordings are allegedly between Joe Biden
"The 1023 produced to that House Committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them. Seventeen total recordings," Grassley said during a speech on the Senate floor.
"These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case he got into a tight spot. The 1023 also indicates that then-Vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burisma employing Hunter Biden," he continued. "More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted unclassified document in a classified facility. That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress."
So the FBI covered up the claim that Burisma's owner had secret recordings between he and the Bidens as an 'insurance policy,' according to Grassley.
More via the Examiner;
Burisma Owner Allegedly Recorded Biden Bribe Convos As 'Insurance Policy' -- And FBI Covered Up: Grassley
Burisma Owner Allegedly Recorded Biden Bribe Convos As 'Insurance Policy' -- And FBI Covered Up: Grassley | ZeroHedge
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Monday dropped yet another bombshell in the recent spate of Biden corruption headlines - that the foreign national who allegedly bribed then-VP Joe Biden kept seventeen secret recordings of both Hunter and Joe Biden as an 'insurance' policy.
According to the Washington Examiner, that foreign national is Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky.
Two of the recordings are allegedly between Joe Biden
"The 1023 produced to that House Committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them. Seventeen total recordings," Grassley said during a speech on the Senate floor.
"These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case he got into a tight spot. The 1023 also indicates that then-Vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burisma employing Hunter Biden," he continued. "More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted unclassified document in a classified facility. That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress."
So the FBI covered up the claim that Burisma's owner had secret recordings between he and the Bidens as an 'insurance policy,' according to Grassley.
More via the Examiner;
And as Just the News notes;
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1668379260149456897?s=20
bigredfish
Known around here
Get acquainted with your next President...
Women's Group To Spend "Tens Of Millions" To Boost Kamala's Image
Women's Group To Spend "Tens Of Millions" To Boost Kamala's Image | ZeroHedge
Women's Group To Spend "Tens Of Millions" To Boost Kamala's Image
Women's Group To Spend "Tens Of Millions" To Boost Kamala's Image | ZeroHedge