US Elections (& Politics) :)

What haven't the Democrats destroyed or turned to crap?

"The Democrat Party has destroyed the DOJ.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the FBI.
The Democrat Party has destroyed every blue city.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the CIA.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the rule of law.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the Constitution.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the border.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the banks.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the CDC.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the FDA.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the children.
The Democrat Party has destroyed trust in vaccines.
The Democrat Party has destroyed trust in doctors.
The Democrat Party has destroyed fair elections.
The Democrat Party has destroyed liberty.
The Democrat Party has destroyed free speech.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the Bill Of Rights.
The Democrat Party has destroyed the middle class.
The Democrat Party destroys everything it touches. "
and...
The Democrat Party has destroyed our public schools and many private colleges and universities.
The Democrat Party has destroyed our military.
The Democrat Party has destroyed all other countries' respect for and trust in the United States.
 
Last edited:
I guess he had trouble finding all the 'evidence'. . .

  • A lawsuit claims Rudy Giuliani was paid $300,000 while pitching investors on an anti-Biden film.
  • Giuliani allegedly said it would be a "kill shot" that would sink Joe Biden's campaign.
  • The farmers gave $1 million but despite assurances of financial success, the movie never came out.
Two farmers who plowed $1 million into a documentary that would supposedly come out before the 2020 election and expose Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's corrupt dealings in Ukraine want their money back.
In 2019, a new lawsuit alleges, California fruit-and-nut farming magnates and brothers Baldev and Kewel Munger met Tim Yale, a Republican political operative at a fundraiser. A few months later, Yale introduced them to Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, according to the suit. By then, Giuliani was hard at work trying to dig up election-year dirt on Joe Biden in his capacity as President Trump's personal attorney.
Giuliani, the lawsuit alleges, asked for the farmers' help finance efforts to make sure Trump was elected to a second term. But Giuliani wasn't seeking a donation — he wanted them to invest in a documentary.
The suit was filed this month by a Munger-owned LLC, one of several entities controlled by the multinational agro-barons, who also hold part ownership of Naturipe, the world's largest producer of blueberries.
Giuliani was working with Yale and cannabis investor George Dickson III, per the suit. The lawsuit claims that the three men pitched the farmers on a film that would be "a possible 'kill shot' to Biden's presidential campaign." The three men "all represented that they possessed key documents that were 'smoking guns' that would establish that the Ukrainian government engaged in a quid pro quo exchange with the Biden family to benefit Burisma," the complaint continues.
Burisma, of course, is the energy company that paid Hunter Biden hundreds of thousands of dollars to sit on its board. Republicans have long alleged but have never proven a nexus between Hunter's work on Burisma's board and Joe Biden's efforts, as vice president, to remove a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the company.
Allegedly, the film was supposed to reveal a "smoking gun" that would take the Bidens down, secure Trump's second term, and enrich the Mungers in the process. "Yale and Dickson represented that this documentary movie was going to be bigger and more profitable than Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' which earned $200 million at the box office."
The Mungers, who had given tens of thousands of dollars to Republican candidates, were sold. They turned over $1 million to finance the film, according to promissory notes attached to the complaint as exhibits. Out of that money, $300,000 allegedly went to Giuliani himself; the rest "was stolen by Dickson and Yale for their own personal use," the lawsuit claims.
None of the promises allegedly made by the film's backers materialized.
The film was never made or released. Joe Biden won the 2020 election. And the Mungers' million-dollar bet vanished.
Giuliani, after conducting interviews with various Ukrainian officials, was unable to produce a "smoking gun." As Election Day drew near, his attention drifted from filmmaking to a different October surprise — emails and other data obtained from Hunter Biden's laptop.
Yet despite Giuliani's opposition research effort, Trump failed to win a second term. Giuliani's efforts to erase that democratic outcome, first with spurious lawsuits and then with denialism and a call to "trial by combat" now have him facing criminal charges in Georgia. He also faces a civil suit filed by his former assistant Noelle Dunphy, which accuses Giuliani of wage theft and sexual assault.
Giuliani is not a defendant in the Mungers' California lawsuit over the film. But he and Dickson were reportedly investigated by the FBI over the movie. The bureau searched Dickson's home in connection with the film 2021, but no charges were ever filed in connection with it. The suit also includes "John Doe" defendants, and could be updated to include more names.
Details about Yale and Dickson's efforts to raise $10 million to finance the film were reported in 2020 by Mother Jones. The magazine reported in 2021 that the production was a disaster that only resulted in 15 minutes of low-quality footage, while Giuliani was paid six figures to fly out in a private jet to woo potential investors.
This isn't the first time that the Mungers have been involved in litigation. Their company Munger Bros. paid $3.75 million to settle a lawsuit that accused them of having "mistreated and illegally fired Mexican nationals" who worked at their blueberry farm in Washington state and was hit with $3.5 million in penalties and back wages in 2019 for improperly recruiting foreign workers, housing them in unsanitary conditions, and dodging pay rules.
The aborted Giuliani film project also forms part of a whistleblower disclosure from Johnathan Buma, an FBI special agent whose allegations were first reported by Insider. Buma's statement alleges that Giuliani raised money for an election-year Biden film from a group of California activists and that Giuliani was soliciting information on Biden from "Ukrainian and also likely Russian sources."
 
Yeah, 'Murica!

A NATIONAL DISGRACE: Photos Leaked of Horrific January 6 Prisoner Abuse – Tortured 5 Months in Isolation in a Closet Room with Light on and a Bucket for a Toilet — Where are the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch?
A NATIONAL DISGRACE: Photos Leaked of Horrific January 6 Prisoner Abuse - Tortured 5 Months in Isolation in a Closet Room with Light on and a Bucket for a Toilet -- Where are the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch? | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
 
Last edited:
That may actually be a good thing? Im no legal beagle but it seems like they;resaying they are going to file the same charges but in federal court instead of Delaware?

Side note: shouldnt Delaware be like an amusement park or large outdoor movie theater instead of a state?
 
His stock is certainly rising in my little world of the galaxy. I am still a DeSantis man, but he needs to get his game on and so far has not, IMO.

1692354694367.png
 
I think you’re seeing the effect of the liberal media attack on DeSantis working, not a change or lack of voice by him.

DeSantis not only stands for those very same principals, but has largely taken bold action on most of them. But you’re being conditioned by media to think that he hasn’t. The equivalent of “look squirrel!”

The constant attacks on DeSantis, (and Faux news is leading the charge), are because he is and has been for some time, directly over the target. They fear him.

Vivek may be saying the same things louder lately, but IMHO he doesn’t stand a chance and the MSM knows that and will continue to put him in a favorable light.
 
I think you’re seeing the effect of the liberal media attack on DeSantis working, not a change or lack of voice by him.

DeSantis not only stands for those very same principals, but has largely taken bold action on most of them. But you’re being conditioned by media to think that he hasn’t. The equivalent of “look squirrel!”

The constant attacks on DeSantis, (and Faux news is leading the charge), are because he is and has been for some time, directly over the target. They fear him.

Vivek may be saying the same things louder lately, but IMHO he doesn’t stand a chance and the MSM knows that and will continue to put him in a favorable light.

You are not wrong and I am one hell of a long way from making a decision either way. Words are cheap, and actions have merit. DeSantis has merit. But, I still like what I am hearing.
 
MSM will come after Vivek but this guy in his first week of him announcing his presidency run released all of his tax returns and investments, yet the media and rival camps couldn't find anything.

So they bait him to say something stupid.
He has got two left wing media persons fired. CNN isn't going to be inviting him back, he has destroyed their agenda. MSNBC where taking pot shots at him, he challenged them and people on X where egging MSNBC to invite him for debate but they chickened out, instead they got chris christie.

Blackrock has its finger in all of news channels cnn, nbc, cbs, abc etc. They even have 15% stake in Fox.
The same blackrock also has stakes in all the big pharma, defense companies. That is the reason Tucker got fired. Another one is Vanguard which also as stakes in all of them.

So they effectively have the means to shape the narrative or even overthrow a government including here.

Now Vivek started a company couple of years back as a direct rival to Blackrock and Vanguard. The reason he did that is because the cancel culture due to woke/blm movement came after his companies, they asked him to show solidarity with the movement and he refused. Many in his company resigned or where forced to resign by woke pressure. So he responded by writing Woke Inc and two more books.

And yes Blackrock and Vanguard are the ones funding woke ideology, climate ideology.

Now the reason he announced he was running for the President was because he fears this country will be lost by the time his two sons become of age.

Another intresting thing Vivek disclosed was that it will take about $200mil for a candidate by the time they become a Republican nominee and 2 billion dollars for some one to become a president.

So everyone who runs always had good intentions but when you get funded by superpac or large donars, your policy changes and you will be the swamp.

The thing Trump and Vivek have in common apart from same policies are that they both where not bought out by superpac donars.

Vivek has said that he will not be spending on Tv ads until the last moment. Since all of his support is coming from grassroots. Even the media is inviting him because he gets the second most views after Trump. Both Trump including in 2015 and Vivek gets free press.
Other candidates have to pay to be on their show.

Another thing on Viveks favour is he has got positive support from Tucker, Elon Musk, Ben Shapiro, Dr Jordan peterson (conservative shrink) and practically every big neutral podcasts out there.
 
Last edited: