US Elections (& Politics) :)

Congrats New Zealand, you may have avoided tarrifs. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

1741270558030.png
 
If they could kill him in a secure building under armed guards and surveillance. Modifying the Epstein client list, JFK files will be a cakewalk.

Also Elon telling he fears his life, if he exposes the full corruption. I mean that guy can literally buy a air force one with decoys and a squadron of F35 for escort and literally drive in a tank level armored convoy with drone support 24x7.
 
GlVEfjma4AAkg6e
 
The Next Setup. US Dept of Education.

Trump will "eliminate" it, which he can't do as it was created by Congress and signed into existence by Carter. In the meantime, is the GOP in Congress doing ANYTHING to codify the elimination of the DOE? They better--- unless they just want Trump to get shot down by the courts again since THEY WON'T ACT. Just what is the gameplan here?

1741280283749.png
 
They gameplan is for Congress to keep right on funding all of the shit DOGE has found and keeping the grift/kickback money flowing.

Congress IS the problem
SCOTUS restored $2Billion of USAID money. How does that work when USAID is effectively disbanded? they even tore the name off the building and I believe cleared the offices of furniture and computers, besides the personnel. WHO is getting that $2B and disbursing it?
 
I believe this is the case.
Trump IS changing the dynamics of the current world order. It’s necessary for our survival. Many who have bled us dry while destroying their own countries are now in full panic mode over it.

 
SCOTUS restored $2Billion of USAID money. How does that work when USAID is effectively disbanded? they even tore the name off the building and I believe cleared the offices of furniture and computers, besides the personnel. WHO is getting that $2B and disbursing it?

I think SCOTUS is wrong on this but to put it into perspective it’s supposedly payment for “work” already performed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David L
I think SCOTUS is wrong on this but to put it into perspective it’s supposedly payment for “work” already performed.
Contracts already signed....but are they saying that the contracts cannot be broken no matter what? Usually there is a clause regarding termination of any agreement. If so, then pay the penalty.
 
I dunno? :idk:I saw payment for work already performed. Not seeing an official claim either way
 
  • Like
Reactions: sdkid