Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
My son periodically takes Ivermectin to clean out his system/body. Kills unwanted parasites...
bigredfish
Known around here
If you go back 4-5 years in this thread you'll see I called out Ralph Baric and UNC Chapel Hill as the birthplace and father of Covid
Ralph gets his funding from NIH/Fauci/DARPA
Ralph gets his funding from NIH/Fauci/DARPA
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Hey I am just sharing this, not sure if it matters but when I post say from YT or other platforms I remove the identifiers, as I call them, and just post the link. Again not sure if it matters or not but just sharing...
When I clicked on your post this is what shows in my browser. For X it is just the number behind /status/, for YouTube it is the characters behind /watch?v= with both normally to the question mark. I noticed the same with other platforms like Fakebook and Instacram...
So I would copy/paste just the highlighted:
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Hmmm. Using Brave, which seems to be like Chrome.
When I hover my cursor over the X this is the URL it shows...maybe it is a chrome/brave thing...
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Ralph Baric Just Blew Up the Official COVID Origins Narrative
and other true stories
Dr. Robert W. Malone
Jul 23, 2026
Executive Summary
Over the past day, we have worked our way through the thousands of pages of documents Senator Rand Paul recently released in his COVID-19 Reading Room, including the transcribed interview with Dr. Ralph Baric released today. Using AI to analyze this enormous collection of congressional testimony, emails, and Slack messages, we uncovered a series of remarkable revelations that fundamentally change our understanding of how the origins of COVID-19 were discussed behind closed doors.
For more than five years, the American public was told that the science was settled. The laboratory-origin hypothesis was dismissed as implausible, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 became the definitive scientific narrative, and those who questioned it were censored, ridiculed, and marginalized.
The newly released documents in Senator Rand Paul’s COVID-19 Reading Room tell a very different story.
Congressional testimony from Dr. Ralph Baric and thousands of pages of private Slack messages reveal that the scientists closest to the evidence privately debated laboratory scenarios, acknowledged uncertainty, discussed gain-of-function research, and questioned many of the very assumptions that were presented to the public as settled science.
Baric himself confirms that DARPA’s proposed coronavirus experiments were gain-of-function research, acknowledges conducting gain-of-function unpublished experiments that undermined a central argument of Proximal Origin, and describes years of coronavirus work involving many of the same investigators and institutions that later became central to the origins debate.
Meanwhile, the Slack discussions show that the paper’s authors continued privately exploring laboratory-related mechanisms both before and long after their paper had become the foundation for government messaging and censorship.
These documents prove that the public was never given the full scientific debate. They expose serious questions about scientific transparency, government involvement, funding disclosures, oversight of gain-of-function research, and the extraordinary effort to present uncertainty as certainty during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history.
What makes this all so important is that this information is now in the congressional record. It can be acted upon.
1. DARPA explicitly solicited gain-of-function research
Baric testified that the DARPA PREEMPT program required gain-of-function experiments to answer the scientific question it posed.
His exact words:
“That’s a gain-of-function experiment. There’s no other way to think about it.”
This undercuts years of semantic arguments that the proposed work somehow wasn’t GOF.
more:
www.malone.news
and other true stories
Dr. Robert W. Malone
Jul 23, 2026
Executive Summary
Over the past day, we have worked our way through the thousands of pages of documents Senator Rand Paul recently released in his COVID-19 Reading Room, including the transcribed interview with Dr. Ralph Baric released today. Using AI to analyze this enormous collection of congressional testimony, emails, and Slack messages, we uncovered a series of remarkable revelations that fundamentally change our understanding of how the origins of COVID-19 were discussed behind closed doors.
For more than five years, the American public was told that the science was settled. The laboratory-origin hypothesis was dismissed as implausible, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 became the definitive scientific narrative, and those who questioned it were censored, ridiculed, and marginalized.
The newly released documents in Senator Rand Paul’s COVID-19 Reading Room tell a very different story.
Congressional testimony from Dr. Ralph Baric and thousands of pages of private Slack messages reveal that the scientists closest to the evidence privately debated laboratory scenarios, acknowledged uncertainty, discussed gain-of-function research, and questioned many of the very assumptions that were presented to the public as settled science.
Baric himself confirms that DARPA’s proposed coronavirus experiments were gain-of-function research, acknowledges conducting gain-of-function unpublished experiments that undermined a central argument of Proximal Origin, and describes years of coronavirus work involving many of the same investigators and institutions that later became central to the origins debate.
Meanwhile, the Slack discussions show that the paper’s authors continued privately exploring laboratory-related mechanisms both before and long after their paper had become the foundation for government messaging and censorship.
These documents prove that the public was never given the full scientific debate. They expose serious questions about scientific transparency, government involvement, funding disclosures, oversight of gain-of-function research, and the extraordinary effort to present uncertainty as certainty during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history.
What makes this all so important is that this information is now in the congressional record. It can be acted upon.
1. DARPA explicitly solicited gain-of-function research
Baric testified that the DARPA PREEMPT program required gain-of-function experiments to answer the scientific question it posed.
His exact words:
“That’s a gain-of-function experiment. There’s no other way to think about it.”
This undercuts years of semantic arguments that the proposed work somehow wasn’t GOF.
more:
Ralph Baric Just Blew Up the Official COVID Origins Narrative
and other true stories
www.malone.news
Federal Court Rules for Woman Fired for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine
Mimi Weiss worked for Kaiser Permanente for 20 years before being terminated.
Kaiser Permanente wrongly fired an employee who declined to receive a COVID-19 vaccine because she gave proper notice to the company of her religious objection to COVID-19 vaccination, a federal appeals court has ruled. Mimi Weiss, who worked for Kaiser Permanente’s The Permanente Medical Group for 20 years before being fired, “plausibly alleged that she provided notice of her religious conflict with the Mandate in her initial request for a religious exemption,” Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest wrote on July 24 for a unanimous panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Weiss was working fully remotely, or off-site, in August 2021 as a senior managerial consultant when Kaiser Permanente imposed a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Weiss, a Christian Jew, within weeks filed for a religious exemption, and Kaiser Permanente initially approved the request. In September 2021, though, Kaiser Permanente said employees had submitted religious accommodation requests with identical language. Expressing concern that some of the requests were not legitimate, the company asked employees to file fresh requests using their own words. Officials then asked Weiss new questions, including, “What else besides the COVID-19 vaccine do you refuse to put in your body as a result of your religious belief?” Weiss said she would not provide private information. Kaiser Permanente placed her on unpaid leave. Then it fired her for not complying with the mandate, prompting a lawsuit by Weiss.
A federal judge in 2024 ruled against her, concluding that Weiss had not provided Kaiser Permanente with sufficient notice of the conflict between receiving a vaccine and her beliefs. The Ninth Circuit ruling overturns that decision, pointing to a previous opinion in which the appeals court said that to provide notice, an employee must only give “enough information about [her] religious needs to permit the employer to understand the existence of a conflict,” and that requiring any more details “would permit an employer to delve into the religious practices of an employee in order to determine whether religion mandates the employee’s adherence.” Applying that framework to the current case means Weiss did give adequate notice, the panel said, because she identified herself as a Christian Jew, listed specific doctrines that she said barred her from receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, and outlined her belief that she should not “introduce foreign substances” into her “body temple” that would “change how [her] Creator designed it.”
In a split 2--1 decision, the panel also said that Weiss has shown sufficient evidence to bring forth allegations that Kaiser Permanente violated her right to privacy.
…
https:/www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-court-rules-for-woman-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-6067769
Mimi Weiss worked for Kaiser Permanente for 20 years before being terminated.
Kaiser Permanente wrongly fired an employee who declined to receive a COVID-19 vaccine because she gave proper notice to the company of her religious objection to COVID-19 vaccination, a federal appeals court has ruled. Mimi Weiss, who worked for Kaiser Permanente’s The Permanente Medical Group for 20 years before being fired, “plausibly alleged that she provided notice of her religious conflict with the Mandate in her initial request for a religious exemption,” Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest wrote on July 24 for a unanimous panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Weiss was working fully remotely, or off-site, in August 2021 as a senior managerial consultant when Kaiser Permanente imposed a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Weiss, a Christian Jew, within weeks filed for a religious exemption, and Kaiser Permanente initially approved the request. In September 2021, though, Kaiser Permanente said employees had submitted religious accommodation requests with identical language. Expressing concern that some of the requests were not legitimate, the company asked employees to file fresh requests using their own words. Officials then asked Weiss new questions, including, “What else besides the COVID-19 vaccine do you refuse to put in your body as a result of your religious belief?” Weiss said she would not provide private information. Kaiser Permanente placed her on unpaid leave. Then it fired her for not complying with the mandate, prompting a lawsuit by Weiss.
A federal judge in 2024 ruled against her, concluding that Weiss had not provided Kaiser Permanente with sufficient notice of the conflict between receiving a vaccine and her beliefs. The Ninth Circuit ruling overturns that decision, pointing to a previous opinion in which the appeals court said that to provide notice, an employee must only give “enough information about [her] religious needs to permit the employer to understand the existence of a conflict,” and that requiring any more details “would permit an employer to delve into the religious practices of an employee in order to determine whether religion mandates the employee’s adherence.” Applying that framework to the current case means Weiss did give adequate notice, the panel said, because she identified herself as a Christian Jew, listed specific doctrines that she said barred her from receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, and outlined her belief that she should not “introduce foreign substances” into her “body temple” that would “change how [her] Creator designed it.”
In a split 2--1 decision, the panel also said that Weiss has shown sufficient evidence to bring forth allegations that Kaiser Permanente violated her right to privacy.
…
https:/www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-court-rules-for-woman-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-6067769
bigredfish
Known around here
It’s hilarious watching politicians and government officials tell Fox News viewers what we already knew in 2021 as if it’s groundbreaking news 
