US Elections (& Politics) :)

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
16,784
Reaction score
39,068
Location
Alabama
What they need to find out is, what meds was the shooter taking? Who was the therapist who counseled the shooter? Who was the psychiatrist who prescribed drugs for them? These answers might be "interesting". These incidents tend to happen too often and too conveniently to the favor of those receiving unfavorable news. Commonly called "false flag" events. I'm not saying nobody was harmed/killed. They definitely were. And it's definitely tragic. But when the news media is already ignoring the Sussmann case daily, and these things happen, the news media has a field day hammering it into our senses day upon day upon day. It's also about trying to take away our Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Yeah, the shooter was blameless. It was definitely the guns that did it.

</rant end>
OK, what follows is my little sermon to the choir:

Let's assume for a minute that all guns of all types could be made unavailable to everyone and every single solitary pistol or rifle was confiscated. In other words, no one...criminals or law-abiding citizens...could use one to commit a crime or defend themselves legally. Yes, that's a big assumption but hear me out.

Let's also assume that someone is bound and determined, come Hell or high water, that they are going to even a score or pay back someone that has wronged them, real or imagined, makes no difference. It can be an individual, a group, a team, a race or ethnic group. Again, it doesn't matter. In this person's mind, any and all are responsible for his situation, his unhappiness, his shame or his depression and they all deserve to incur his wrath. Someone will have to die to achieve that goal and it matters not how many pay this ultimate price. Okay, so he has no firearm of any type:
  • How many could he have killed with a machete or knife?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with a pipe bomb, dynamite or a plastic explosives?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed at an organized outside event, like a parade, a graduation or on an athletic field with a vehicle?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with the mass introduction of poison or gas in the cafeteria?
  • We don't know.....and I hope we never find out to ALL of the above possible scenarios.
My point......would eliminating ALL firearms prevent such a tragedy in the future?

OF COURSE NOT! A MENTALLY UNSTABLE PERSON THAT DECIDES TO KILL WILL FIND THE MEANS AND THE METHODS TO DO SO !!!!
 

Gargoile

Getting comfortable
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Messages
813
Reaction score
3,017
Location
Straight Outta Mayberry
One of the theories floating around the interwebz is Durham has further indictments for criminal activities much more recent. If Biden dares to pardon anyone indicted and convicted on Durham charges, Durham is prepared to bring the entire diseased temple down upon their heads.
What is this is on hold till a republican is in the oval office?
 

Oceanslider

Known around here
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
7,003
Reaction score
23,937
Location
Southern California, USA
Daily Dot - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

PinkNews - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

We already know where Newsweak and Yahoo stand, which is to the left. As to the picture I am not 100% sure but there are a lot of other sources about his gay lifestyle.
I just want to know the truth. I did find one pic that smilinggreen posted int he 2nd Amendment thread that was not him 2nd Amendment thread | Page 49 | IP Cam Talk

Look down a bit and you will find the closeup pic.

I have been working a lot, even though it does not seem like from my postings, I'm typically out all day working from 7am till 5-6 most days. I'm getting most of my news here ;)

Here is the direct link to the pic that looks to me like it is NOT him, in that four pic montage. 2nd Amendment thread | Page 49 | IP Cam Talk

1653524897954.png
 
Last edited:

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,966
Reaction score
23,277
OK, what follows is my little sermon to the choir:

Let's assume for a minute that all guns of all types could be made unavailable to everyone and every single solitary pistol or rifle was confiscated. In other words, no one...criminals or law-abiding citizens...could use one to commit a crime or defend themselves legally. Yes, that's a big assumption but hear me out.

Let's also assume that someone is bound and determined, come Hell or high water, that they are going to even a score or pay back someone that has wronged them, real or imagined, makes no difference. It can be an individual, a group, a team, a race or ethnic group. Again, it doesn't matter. In this person's mind, any and all are responsible for his situation, his unhappiness, his shame or his depression and they all deserve to incur his wrath. Someone will have to die to achieve that goal and it matters not how many pay this ultimate price. Okay, so he has no firearm of any type:
  • How many could he have killed with a machete or knife?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with a pipe bomb, dynamite or a plastic explosives?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed at an organized outside event, like a parade, a graduation or on an athletic field with a vehicle?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with the mass introduction of poison or gas in the cafeteria?
  • We don't know.....and I hope we never find out to ALL of the above possible scenarios.
My point......would eliminating ALL firearms prevent such a tragedy in the future?

OF COURSE NOT! A MENTALLY UNSTABLE PERSON THAT DECIDES TO KILL WILL FIND THE MEANS AND THE METHODS TO DO SO !!!!
For reference .. look at Arson fire deaths ... many more victims in those incidents .. time to ban matches ..

 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,628
Reaction score
16,042
Location
Cypress, California
^^^
Where is the info that proves he had a gay lifestyle? Because if he indeed did, the MSM will do their best to suppress that.
Well, they are. What they really wanted was it to be a White person so that they could use the White Supremist angle. Heck they even might wind up calling this guy a White Hispanic supremist. ;) Anyone who dares to bring up a gay lifestyle with this guy will be ostracized by the media.
 
Last edited:

Smilingreen

Known around here
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Messages
3,604
Reaction score
14,390
Location
Tennessee USA
What they need to find out is, what meds was the shooter taking? Who was the therapist who counseled the shooter? Who was the psychiatrist who prescribed drugs for them? These answers might be "interesting". These incidents tend to happen too often and too conveniently to the favor of those receiving unfavorable news. Commonly called "false flag" events. I'm not saying nobody was harmed/killed. They definitely were. And it's definitely tragic. But when the news media is already ignoring the Sussmann case daily, and these things happen, the news media has a field day hammering it into our senses day upon day upon day. It's also about trying to take away our Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Yeah, the shooter was blameless. It was definitely the guns that did it.

</rant end>


SCHUMER JUST NOW: “We are GOING to vote on gun legislation."
https:/twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1529526778372538372
Schumer can squawk and puff his chest out all day. He or a group of his croonies does this everytime his party stages one of these events. Totally empty words. The real news hiding in the background is Brandon attempting to give our sovereignty away to the UN this week.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
12,280
Location
Charlotte
Schumer can squawk and puff his chest out all day. He or a group of his croonies does this everytime his party stages one of these events. Totally empty words. The real news hiding in the background is Brandon attempting to give our sovereignty away to the UN this week.
You're right, everything happening this week is to say "Look HERE and not THERE".
Fortunately, Biden cannot sign a treaty without Congress-critter approval.
His is not the last word, no matter WHAT they think.

He's trying to give it away to the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the UN.
 

Smilingreen

Known around here
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Messages
3,604
Reaction score
14,390
Location
Tennessee USA
You're right, everything happening this week is to say "Look HERE and not THERE".
Fortunately, Biden cannot sign a treaty without Congress-critter approval.
His is not the last word, no matter WHAT they think.

He's trying to give it away to the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the UN.
Obviously, the past year and a half has been planned out for a long time. There is no way 1 single, mentally feeble, career politician could possibly fuck up everything he touches, every single time. And to top it all off, this is all being fast tracked with back to back events. He is going to keep fucking around with this and the majority of people will eventually have enough and will revolt. That revolt will make January 6th look like a kindergarten recess period.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
3,650
Reaction score
15,115
Location
South Dakota
OK, what follows is my little sermon to the choir:

Let's assume for a minute that all guns of all types could be made unavailable to everyone and every single solitary pistol or rifle was confiscated. In other words, no one...criminals or law-abiding citizens...could use one to commit a crime or defend themselves legally. Yes, that's a big assumption but hear me out.

Let's also assume that someone is bound and determined, come Hell or high water, that they are going to even a score or pay back someone that has wronged them, real or imagined, makes no difference. It can be an individual, a group, a team, a race or ethnic group. Again, it doesn't matter. In this person's mind, any and all are responsible for his situation, his unhappiness, his shame or his depression and they all deserve to incur his wrath. Someone will have to die to achieve that goal and it matters not how many pay this ultimate price. Okay, so he has no firearm of any type:
  • How many could he have killed with a machete or knife?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with a pipe bomb, dynamite or a plastic explosives?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed at an organized outside event, like a parade, a graduation or on an athletic field with a vehicle?
  • We don't know.
  • How many could he have killed with the mass introduction of poison or gas in the cafeteria?
  • We don't know.....and I hope we never find out to ALL of the above possible scenarios.
My point......would eliminating ALL firearms prevent such a tragedy in the future?

OF COURSE NOT! A MENTALLY UNSTABLE PERSON THAT DECIDES TO KILL WILL FIND THE MEANS AND THE METHODS TO DO SO !!!!
1653578329414.png

more:

1653578423690.png

1653578510081.png

1653578694154.png


1653578824054.png
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,966
Reaction score
23,277
Violence and human history .. whatever the tool, the attackers find ways ..


CNN

At least 19 people were killed and 26 injured in a stabbing spree at a facility for disabled people west of Tokyo, making it one of Japan’s deadliest mass killings since World War II. Nine men and 10 women, ranging in age from 18 to 70, were killed in the attack.

1653584100960.png
 

ctgoldwing

Getting comfortable
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
493
Reaction score
648
Location
Beacon, NY
The loser loses again:

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump must answer questions under oath in the New York attorney general’s civil investigation into his business practices, a state appeals court ruled Thursday, rejecting his argument that he be excused from testifying because his answers could be used in a parallel criminal probe.

A four-judge panel in the appellate division of the state’s trial court upheld Judge Arthur Engoron’s Feb. 17 ruling, which enforced subpoenas requiring that Trump and his two eldest children — Ivanka and Donald Jr. — give deposition testimony in Attorney General Letitia James’ probe.
 
Top