Recently I’ve begun testing the IVS Event trigger capabilities of my 5442 cameras. I’ve noticed false positives for Motion triggers when no vehicle or person OSS present. Is this pretty common?
IVS person and vehicle false positives
- Thread starter 105437
- Start date
Are you using the new BI with onvif xml? That's exactly what happended to me when I updated and tried the posted additions to the onvif 'code' Both 5442 cameras , one with 'vehicles' and one with 'person' intrusion triggered via IVS for no apparent reason
I have confirmed that Motion Detection and Smart Motion Detection are off on the cameras. In BI, the only trigger source is ONVIF/camera events.
OK, yeah the 5442s with the latest 5.7.5.x versions have been problematic and not triggering
You need to either roll back to pre 5.7.5 or use the IVS hack mentioned in the BI 5.7.5 thread.
You need to either roll back to pre 5.7.5 or use the IVS hack mentioned in the BI 5.7.5 thread.
As expected, testing after removing these two additions resulted in no IVS trigger events recognized by BI.
I noticed something this morning while testing ONVIF IVS triggers from my 5442s. I’m testing with the latest version of BI and I have noticed that Intrusion IVS trigger are working via ONVIF without the two manually added additions made to the ONVIF configuration in BI for the cameras. Tripwires continue to not work however.
update:
Works!
5.7.6.2 all I did was update to this version
and my 5442 that uses intrusion for cars activated and recorded properly, firmware 2.840.15OG008.0.R, Build Date: 2022-02-18
Also my zoomed person intrusion 5442 worked, firmware:2.840.15OG00D.0.R, Build Date: 2022-08-18
Works!
5.7.6.2 all I did was update to this version
and my 5442 that uses intrusion for cars activated and recorded properly, firmware 2.840.15OG008.0.R, Build Date: 2022-02-18
Also my zoomed person intrusion 5442 worked, firmware:2.840.15OG00D.0.R, Build Date: 2022-08-18
Last edited:
Agree!
Even my Annke NCD800, which I had never gotten to work with IVS/onvif is working, one less camera that needs to spend Code Project GPU time
Even my Annke NCD800, which I had never gotten to work with IVS/onvif is working, one less camera that needs to spend Code Project GPU time
biggen
Known around here
- May 6, 2018
- 2,776
- 3,181
I’ve given up on CPAI and exclusively use the built in Dahua IVS. It seems to work better and I don’t have to fix CPAI stuff after every release they put out.Agree!
Even my Annke NCD800, which I had never gotten to work with IVS/onvif is working, one less camera that needs to spend Code Project GPU time
I can understand that. I just recently started testing the built-in AI in my 5442s. While detecting for people and vehicles, I get occasional false positives with tree shadows blowing in the wind. I've never noticed that with CPAI.
Can you post a video sample?
Do you have an SD card in the camera that you can playback the event with the IVS rules on to see why it triggered?
Have you done the global config?
It might be something as simple as adjusting an IVS rule a little. Mine never go off for tree shadows.
Do you have an SD card in the camera that you can playback the event with the IVS rules on to see why it triggered?
Have you done the global config?
It might be something as simple as adjusting an IVS rule a little. Mine never go off for tree shadows.
Here's a sample. No Human or Vehicle, but it triggered anyway.
Here's the Intrusion zone and settings.
Last edited: