US Elections (& Politics) :)

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,639
Reaction score
71,094
Location
SE Michigan USA
Sarah was in the fertilized egg business. She had several hundred young pullets and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs. She kept records and any rooster not performing went into the soup pot and was replaced.

This took a lot of time, so she bought some tiny bells and attached them to her roosters. Each bell had a different tone, so she could tell from a distance which rooster was performing. Now, she could sit on the porch and fill out an efficiency report by just listening to the bells.

Sarah's favorite rooster, old Butch, was a very fine specimen but, this morning she noticed old Butch's bell hadn't rung at all! When she went to investigate, she saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets, bells-a-ringing, but the pullets hearing the roosters coming, would run for cover.

To Sarah's amazement, old Butch had his bell in his beak, so it couldn't ring.
He'd sneak up on a pullet, do his job, and walk on to the next one.

Sarah was so proud of old Butch, she entered him in a Show and he became an overnight sensation among the judges. The result was the judges not only awarded old Butch the "No Bell Peace Prize" they also awarded him the "Pulletsurprise" as well. Clearly old Butch was a politician in the making.

Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most coveted awards on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the unsuspecting populace and screwing them when they weren't paying attention?

Vote carefully in the next election. You can't always hear the bells.
 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,805
Reaction score
16,889
Location
Cypress, California
A poster's thought on the Colorado Supreme Court decision.

"Proof a lawyer can know nothing about the law. These judges cited things not in evidence, laws that do not exist, and concluded things not even their peers would support.

These “judges” acted as political activists and not judges."
 

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,981
Reaction score
14,670
Location
Orlando

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,639
Reaction score
71,094
Location
SE Michigan USA

tigerwillow1

Known around here
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
4,023
Reaction score
9,033
Location
USA, Oregon
This colorado court decision is a big piece of bullcrap on its own. Take a look this part of it from page 133:

"But we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires, it shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court. "

So if Trump appeals the ruling, this nice 213 page pile of crap says or does nothing. Do they think he might not appeal? One interpretation is the only purpose of this is for the press to blow it out of proportion. Another is that it's meant to incite people to do things so they can grab more political prisoners a la Jan 6.

Colarado illiterate court ruling
 

gwminor48

Known around here
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
3,800
Reaction score
7,725
Location
Texas

David L

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
8,671
Reaction score
22,980
Location
USA
I suppose our schools are proud of themselves.

POLL: 79 Percent of Americans Aged 18-24 Believe ‘White People are Oppressors’ and Should Be Punished in Society


Let me guess, over half or more are white people believing this, lmao. So now along with their "Entitlement Card" the have a "Victim Card" too...wow, what Losers...
 
Top