US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Sybertiger
Known around here
View attachment 185841
Here's one of the scenes from the trailer for Weekend at Bidens. Very silly funny scene where the dead guy is propped up in front of the people in the review stands and no one notices. I love a good slapstick comedy!
Sybertiger
Known around here
It's coming...can you feel it?
Inside Biden’s Protective White House
WASHINGTON — Aides have President Joe Biden take the shorter stairs to board Air Force One. When it comes to news conferences, they yell loudly — and quickly — to end the questions, sometimes stealing a classic awards show tactic and playing loud music to signal the conclusion of the event. And...
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Clicked the survey wanting to see the results.
Are there really 1.5k out of 6.4K that want her? Really?
Are there really 1.5k out of 6.4K that want her? Really?
bigredfish
Known around here
Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump 'Almost Certainly' Won In 2020
Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump 'Almost Certainly' Won In 2020 | ZeroHedge
A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.
....The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.
After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in ballot fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 presidential election.
They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in ballots during the pandemic, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.
“Had the 2020 election been conducted like every national election has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of voters cast ballots in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.
Over 43 percent of 2020 votes were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.
Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump 'Almost Certainly' Won In 2020 | ZeroHedge
A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.
....The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.
After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in ballot fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 presidential election.
They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in ballots during the pandemic, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.
“Had the 2020 election been conducted like every national election has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of voters cast ballots in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.
Over 43 percent of 2020 votes were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.
Its PETTY ASS SHIT LIKE THIS that gets Trump blasted. Why? WTF did he have to go there? Leave the petty shit alone! With everything that is fucked up and he has great policies on and can attack, WHY stoop to this shit? 
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Kremlin official youtube channel has also uploaded the tucker interview, only difference is its taken with their own cameras with wrong white balance, poorer video quality. Audio translation is from a different person who was doing live translation on set to Tucker, so the video has longer pauses for the time it takes to translate for Putin to russian and for Tucker to english.
Tucker interview has shorter wait time for translation, Tucker version had a new translation in post production from a russian who can speak english with typical russian accent. (kremlin video translator to Tucker had a guy with british accent).
Tucker version had more emphasis on Tucker facial expression and reaction while the kremlin version was focused more on putin.
Tucker version showed the Putin bald head from behind, where as the kremlin version didn't show the feed from that camera.
Tucker translator which was done in post production appears to be a word for word of Putin. The on set live translator in kremlin version skipped or missed certian details.
Had Tucker used the kremlin version not many would have watched it past 5 minute mark.
Also rumor is that Tucker also got a Snowden interview.
Tucker interview has shorter wait time for translation, Tucker version had a new translation in post production from a russian who can speak english with typical russian accent. (kremlin video translator to Tucker had a guy with british accent).
Tucker version had more emphasis on Tucker facial expression and reaction while the kremlin version was focused more on putin.
Tucker version showed the Putin bald head from behind, where as the kremlin version didn't show the feed from that camera.
Tucker translator which was done in post production appears to be a word for word of Putin. The on set live translator in kremlin version skipped or missed certian details.
Had Tucker used the kremlin version not many would have watched it past 5 minute mark.
Also rumor is that Tucker also got a Snowden interview.
Last edited:
If we're being forced to watch a scripted drama...
Frankly, I'd rather watch Jeff Dunham's Walter.
At least we know he's a dummy from the start.
Frankly, I'd rather watch Jeff Dunham's Walter.
At least we know he's a dummy from the start.