Blue Iris and CodeProject.AI ALPR

I updated to .28. ALPR is working great. Here are my BI --> AI settings for reference:

1741644283274.png

It doesn't appear I need to check the "Use GPU" checked. Any info on that? I don't see anything in the help file.

1741644490012.png
 
olympia said:
...but you have auto start enabled what shouldn't be needed any longer with .28.
Click to expand...
Nothing happen when I have it unchecked. I need it checked for it to work apparently.
 
Would be nice if you could try unchecking and rebooting to see if it starts.

It’s not working on my end, but I might have a different issue. My BI machine uses a 10G SFP+ Ethernet interface, and the network initialization is slower than usual (taking 30–60 seconds after boot). This might be causing problems if the BI service starts before the network is ready.

If it works for you, I'll need to reach out to Ken to find a solution. If it doesn’t work for you either, then we’ll have to contact Ken anyway...
 
olympia said:
Would be nice if you could try unchecking and rebooting to see if it starts.

It’s not working on my end, but I might have a different issue. My BI machine uses a 10G SFP+ Ethernet interface, and the network initialization is slower than usual (taking 30–60 seconds after boot). This might be causing problems if the BI service starts before the network is ready.

If it works for you, I'll need to reach out to Ken to find a solution. If it doesn’t work for you either, then we’ll have to contact Ken anyway...
Click to expand...
I unchecked the box and restarted the BI service. It appears to be working.

How many camera do you have if you need 10 Giga? I use maybe 50-60 mbps of my Gigabit link on the input...
 
wpiman said:
I unchecked the box and restarted the BI service. It appears to be working.

How many camera do you have if you need 10 Giga? I use maybe 50-60 mbps of my Gigabit link on the input...
Click to expand...

Ahh, it’s not about necessity—it’s because I can! :)
BI runs on a Windows 11 VM within an unRAID server, and I had an unused SFP+ port there what I could pass through to the VM. Plus, my core switch in the same rack cabinet had free SFP+ ports, so it was a no-brainer to connect them. :)
...but yeah, it seems like I have a problem now that I wouldn't have with normal 1G copper interface :)

...buy the way, sometimes I am thinking if it is actually worthwhile or not to run CPAI as a docker (again in my case in the same unRAID server), or it would be better to run it local in the same Windows VM together with BI.
Initially I thought it's more slick and efficient to run it separately in docker, but I am not that convinced anymore. Does anyone have an idea how to measure/ decide which approach is better?
 
olympia said:
Ahh, it’s not about necessity—it’s because I can! :)
BI runs on a Windows 11 VM within an unRAID server, and I had an unused SFP+ port there what I could pass through to the VM. Plus, my core switch in the same rack cabinet had free SFP+ ports, so it was a no-brainer to connect them. :)
...but yeah, it seems like I have a problem now that I wouldn't have with normal 1G copper interface :)

...buy the way, sometimes I am thinking if it is actually worthwhile or not to run CPAI as a docker (again in my case in the same unRAID server), or it would be better to run it local in the same Windows VM together with BI.
Initially I thought it's more slick and efficient to run it separately in docker, but I am not that convinced anymore. Does anyone have an idea how to measure/ decide which approach is better?
Click to expand...
Why would Ken need to weigh in on your SFP issue? Sounds like an IT issue.

I run CP.AI on a separate machine on docker. I do as little on Windows as possible as it is the most unstable part of my network and I minimize what I do on it. Docker installation is also super simple. Going to another machine definitely slows things down. Sounds like you would not being doing that.

I'd try running some comparisons. Use the GUI on windows and try the windows page and the docker page and look at the times.

I'd be interested in how it goes.

I have a Linux machine with a ZFS and 21 drives that basically is a NAS. I have a ESXi box that is basically just running Linux with all of my Docker stuff on it that is critical. I have a BI box and I moved Plex to a mini PC that has quicksync. I'd love to maybe build a machine that runs Rocky linux and runs CP.AI, Plex, a bunch of mission critical docker instances (home automation) and I'd like to re-virtualize Blue Iris. Basically go down to 2 machines-- NAS and new machine.
 
wpiman said:
Why would Ken need to weigh in on your SFP issue? Sounds like an IT issue.
Click to expand...

...because Blue Iris is a network dependent application. Consequently the best practice is to handle network dependency handling in its startup routine and only start activities on the network, once the network stack is up and running.

I found a workaround however: if I change the startup type of Blue Iris service from Automatic to Automatic (Delayed Start), then all is fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom