Search results

  1. N

    Enabling Overlays for two Cameras drops the whole FPS in UI for all cameras to 2-3 fps

    As soon as I remove the overlay, either by deleting the object or by unchecking the "Display live overlay" all goes back to normal. When I just add one overlay graphic to one camera, all goes downhill and fps is back to 2-4 ... even when I watch just a different (!) single camera in UI3. BI is...
  2. N

    Enabling Overlays for two Cameras drops the whole FPS in UI for all cameras to 2-3 fps

    Hi have a very strange issue and can't find any solution. I have added a privacy mask for two cameras in BI via overlays. For these two cameras I needed to change the recording profile to re-encode, but recording is only done when the camera is triggered. The cameras are clones from their...
  3. N

    5.5.8 - June 13, 2022 - Code Project’s SenseAI Version 1 - See V2 here https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/codeproject-ai-version-2-0.68030/

    When checked, it uses the camera main stream. But as the AI resizes to 640px anyhow, it needs additional CPU power for resizing before analyzing. So in most cases feeding the sub stream is better.
  4. N

    5.5.8 - June 13, 2022 - Code Project’s SenseAI Version 1 - See V2 here https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/codeproject-ai-version-2-0.68030/

    However, you pay with preciseness as I've seen. Running both, the default and the combined model, the combined one often misses persons and cars which are quite small. The default model takes much more time, but detects ways better. I think the golden solution would be the default model with...
  5. N

    5.5.8 - June 13, 2022 - Code Project’s SenseAI Version 1 - See V2 here https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/codeproject-ai-version-2-0.68030/

    This is how I did it to use the combined.pt model (which boosts my detection by factor 3) with docker: This is my docker-compose.yml for SenseAI: version: "3.3" services: deepstack: image: codeproject/ai-server:latest restart: unless-stopped container_name: senseai ports...
  6. N

    5.5.8 - June 13, 2022 - Code Project’s SenseAI Version 1 - See V2 here https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/codeproject-ai-version-2-0.68030/

    OK, it is much slower in real life on the same server with the same resources. So not production-ready right now. Two usual alarms on my frontcam (person walking by): DeepStack: And after switching to SenseAI on the same cam: This is an average plus of 250ms (or 50%) per picture. So no...
  7. N

    5.5.8 - June 13, 2022 - Code Project’s SenseAI Version 1 - See V2 here https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/codeproject-ai-version-2-0.68030/

    I'm running my Deepstack in a separate VM, so it was pretty straight forward to spin up another VM running SenseAI. With the "Override server" checkbox it's extremely easy to switch between these two per camera by just checking the box and entering the IP of the SenseAI (Default is DeepStack)...
  8. N

    Hell Yeah! Direct Deepstack Integration - 5.4.0 - March 31, 2021

    I wrote this to Ken 15 minutes ago ;) (1-5 secs configurable) along with the proposal to integrate a checkbox "use main stream for AI" per camera.
  9. N

    Hell Yeah! Direct Deepstack Integration - 5.4.0 - March 31, 2021

    Just got a reply from Ken, the number of possible alarm pictures in 1s-interval will be extended to 30 in 5.4.2.2 :clap:
  10. N

    Hell Yeah! Direct Deepstack Integration - 5.4.0 - March 31, 2021

    @wittaj No CPU issues. BI is permanently around 18% CPU load, no peaks as AI is running separately in a dedicated VM on one of my R720, it can use 15 vCPU of the Dual Xeon E5-2650Lv2 setup of the machine. Runs on Linux, much better performance than on Windows (and I avoid the M$ crap where ever...
  11. N

    Hell Yeah! Direct Deepstack Integration - 5.4.0 - March 31, 2021

    I'm really excited that Ken has implemented native DeepStack support, that has eased my config by far! But there are still some issues in the implementation. Most important are these two: The Alarm action fires extremely delayed! In my hallway today BI confirmed me at 13:07:11 - this is the...
  12. N

    Yet Another Free Extension for Blue Iris Adding AI Object Dectection/Reduction in False Alarms/Enhanced Notification of Activity/On Guard

    Just a short question: When the reference points got messed up with previous versions ... how do I correct them?
  13. N

    Yet Another Free Extension for Blue Iris Adding AI Object Dectection/Reduction in False Alarms/Enhanced Notification of Activity/On Guard

    It's a perspective thing. Our driveway i.e. of course due to the perspective of the cam has a much lower width on top of the picture than at the bottom. The street, where I don't want cars to trigger the event, is an inclined line and not a fully horizontal thing on the camera picture. When I...
  14. N

    Yet Another Free Extension for Blue Iris Adding AI Object Dectection/Reduction in False Alarms/Enhanced Notification of Activity/On Guard

    Hmmm, OK ... I do get SQL errors: MainWindow - SQLException - GetNextMotion - Opening Connection: Netzwerkbezogener oder instanzspezifischer Fehler beim Herstellen einer Verbindung mit SQL Server. Der Server wurde nicht gefunden, oder auf ihn kann nicht zugegriffen werden. Überprüfen Sie, ob...
  15. N

    Yet Another Free Extension for Blue Iris Adding AI Object Dectection/Reduction in False Alarms/Enhanced Notification of Activity/On Guard

    I've installed this SQL2016 Express and this version, left the SQL string as it was and it seems to work. How would I notice in case the SQL would not work? I've also discovered an issue: When the BI server is not reachable and you click on "continuous" in a cam view, the software crashes. If...
  16. N

    Yet Another Free Extension for Blue Iris Adding AI Object Dectection/Reduction in False Alarms/Enhanced Notification of Activity/On Guard

    @Ken98045 I really would love to use your great piece of software, but what is the reason behind such a high requirement of MS SQL server 2019? Why can't 2016 or before work? I run all my instances on Windows Server 2012R2 (because I have licenses for it) and would never run a CCTV server on...
  17. N

    On-premise version

    @varghesesa Sam, is there any news about the on-premise version?
  18. N

    Profile settings lost after BI 5 upgrade

    Update: Ken replied and apologized for the bug. It should be fixed in version .45 now according to his response.
  19. N

    Profile settings lost after BI 5 upgrade

    Unfortunately still no reaction to my support email ... just to update you. As I'm on a business trip soon I think I'll retry the BI5 in three weeks, I can't properly test remote and I won't upset my people at home.
  20. N

    Profile settings lost after BI 5 upgrade

    Unfortunately the flaw is more serious to me ... I've emailed Ken and I'm back to V4 for now.
  21. N

    Profile settings lost after BI 5 upgrade

    After the update to BI5 all seemed to work well until I discovered that some zone definitions were lost. More sever, all cam's were set back to "non High Definition" and all detections to "Simple" (instead of "Gaussian") detection. I can't change this, when I save the setting and go back to the...
  22. N

    On-premise version

    Hi, I'm using BlueIris since years and I love this product, pretty high on my wishlist is some people/face/car recognition feature and I was excited reading about the Sentry thing in the first five minutes ... until I've read that it's a cloud thingy :( I don't really like cloud services where...
  23. N

    Real client-server structure

    Good morning @all, I'd really love to have a real client-server structure for BI ... it's working perfectly, but the only drawback is that the BI "viewer" is bound to the same server machine as the core itself. So either I need to remote into the server via RDP to have the full client...
  24. N

    BI 4.2.2.0 breaks motion detection - how to downgrade

    I saw my BI being on 4.2.2.1 this morning, but that did not fix the problem. Using a backup from October, 16th brought me back to version 4.1.9.2, running happily with a working motion detection again. There should be a 4.2.0 from the web site history, but it seems that was never installed. So...
  25. N

    BI 4.2.2.0 breaks motion detection - how to downgrade

    It's not only skies, atom. In my setup it's randomly everywhere, also in relevant areas.
  26. N

    BI 4.2.2.0 breaks motion detection - how to downgrade

    I agree partially, Fenderman. Useful would be a split into a stable branch and experimental branch. Stable versions go into AutoUpdate, experimental versions have to be installed manually on your own risk. I also love testing features and functions, doing this with a number of products. I also...
  27. N

    BI 4.2.2.0 breaks motion detection - how to downgrade

    I've played around with the new travel setting (which is on by default at 100 pixels), but I can't get that working. I'll live with some hundreds of events over night and run an update.exe from one of my backups tomorrow. Even there *is* no traveling in my pictures when suddenly a red rectangle...
  28. N

    BI 4.2.2.0 breaks motion detection - how to downgrade

    Hi, this morning I've notices masses of false motion detections on my cameras. Checking that I've seen that BI has updated to 4.2.2.0. Several times per hour a bunch of green and red "motion recangles" are appearing on the camera pictures, triggering the motion alarm. There is absolutely no...
  29. N

    Foscam FI9900P - Short review

    Hi there, I'm a reader in this forums for quite a while ... as a BlueIris user it's a great source to get experienced hints! :-) Today I want to give a short review about the Foscam FI9900P. When we have built our new home in 2013 I've started CCTV with two ABUS TVIP 62000. These are 2MP cams...
Top