Newsom needs to work on his own problems in California and leave us legal gun owners alone.
"
"
he is a complete fucking moron. 27 states have Constitutional Carry now, but he thinks 3/4 will vote against the express warnings of the founding fathers and the "shall not be infringed" phrase? This is a bullshit propaganda publicity stunt, and the only thing to come of it is that he is a traitor who refuses to follow his own oath to the Constitution.
100% .. Newsom betrayed his oath of office .. too bad the recall failed .. sheep in People's Republik of Kalifornia
It would be worded to REPLACE the Second Amendment and render 2A null in much the same way Prohibition was repealed and the amendment forbidding alcohol was repealed.I thought I knew a little something about the Constitution but explain to me how amendment 28 pre-empts amendment 2?
It would be worded to REPLACE the Second Amendment and render 2A null in much the same way Prohibition was repealed and the amendment forbidding alcohol was repealed.
It would never go to the Supreme Court because it would NEVER be ratified into law by 3/4 of the states.I guess I am dense. Alcohol use, to the best of my knowledge, was never a specified right by the Constitution.
If the 28th amendment is written to replace the 2A then I would think that it would fail at the the Supreme Court because 2/3 of the states did not agree?
It would never go to the Supreme Court because it would NEVER be ratified into law by 3/4 of the states.
He's playing a bigger game-- probably at the Electoral College. He knows it will never happen, but he will use that and portray it as an unfair "failure" of the Constitution where many low-population states can block this kind of idiocy that urban areas want. They can convince urban idiot mouth-breathers that "it's the guns". His bigger game is to work towards the removal of states rights and make Federal laws and bureaucracies the ultimate authority (just like State laws and buraucracies like CARB in Commiefornia). He wants totalitarianism.
Eliminating the Electoral College would still require a constitutional amendment, so it would get no more traction than an amendment to repeal the 2nd Amendment. There is simply no way that 38 states will approve an amendment that effectively makes a minority of states the arbiter of all federal elections.It would never go to the Supreme Court because it would NEVER be ratified into law by 3/4 of the states.
He's playing a bigger game-- probably aiming at the Electoral College. He knows this BS amendment will never happen, but he will use that and portray it as an unfair "failure" of the Constitution where many low-population states can block this kind of idiocy that urban areas want. They can convince urban idiot mouth-breathers that "it's the guns". His bigger game is to work towards the removal of states rights and make Federal laws and bureaucracies the ultimate authority (just like State laws and buraucracies like CARB in Commiefornia). He wants totalitarianism.
This would be yet another screwup by the stupid dems who can only see short term greed and not care about the long term consequences. I believe such a previous act is the reason the supreme court is majority conservative. Not that political leaning should have any effect on court decisions because they are driven solely by the constitutionAll it will take is for the shoe to be on the other foot, i.e. a Democrat squeaks by with more electoral votes than popular votes, and every blue state will repeal it so quickly that everyone's head will spin. It's pure political show.