2nd Amendment thread

I'm too lazy too, but like you, I won't be running low any time soon either. Heck, I'm betting that when I'm dead, my kids will be wondering what to do with all of it. But then, I've always been what the MSM would call a "horder"... :rofl:
So, you know we would be classified as having a "Huge Cache", "Huge Stockpile" or "Huge Arsenal" by the idiot media.
I enjoy reloading, because every time I do it, I like to imagine some libtards head is giving him nightmares.
 
So, you know we would be classified as having a "Huge Cache", "Huge Stockpile" or "Huge Arsenal" by the idiot media.
I enjoy reloading, because every time I do it, I like to imagine some libtards head is giving him nightmares.

I recall a massive stockpile of ammo used to only be $12 +/- for a 22LR ... ( 500 rds )
 
I'm too lazy too, but like you, I won't be running low any time soon either. Heck, I'm betting that when I'm dead, my kids will be wondering what to do with all of it. But then, I've always been what the MSM would call a "horder"... :rofl:

I put mine in my will :rofl:
 
I had them in my will until I shipped them all to the Taliban in case they ran short, those that were left after that boating accident anyway.
 
Last edited:
WCVB Boston: Massachusetts-based gun maker to relocate headquarters to Tennessee.

S&W .. perhaps time to move it all out of Massachusetts .. and offer relocation for employees ..


The 192nd General Court of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Bill SD.2588

Chapter 269 of the General Laws is amended by adding the following section:-
Section 20. No person shall, within the commonwealth, manufacture or cause to be manufactured, partially or completely, any assault weapon or large capacity feeding device as defined in section 121 of chapter 140 of the General Laws. This prohibition shall not apply to weapons or devices manufactured by a licensed manufacturer solely for the purpose of the lawful sale to an authorized law enforcement or military agency of the commonwealth, any other state, the United States, or a foreign government approved by the United States State Department.
Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $1,000,000 or by imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than ten years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
 
LAPD gets a firearms which is not on the approved CA Safety list ...



California Says LAPD New Service Pistol Safe For Police But Not For Civilians

LAPD Fn 509 MRD
StackPath

California gun laws are designed to punish gun owners and not keep them safe, and here is yet another example.

I currently own the MRD, and I had no issues with this gun, so it was no surprise when I learned that the Los Angeles Police Department Selected the FN 509 MRD as their new Duty Pistol.

But here's where it gets ironic. LAPD thought so highly of the FN 509 MRD that it decided to make it the official duty gun of all LAPD cops.

Still, right now, if you live in California, you can't own the FN 509 MRD as a citizen.

FN legally can't sell this gun to people in California because California thinks the FN 509 MRD is unsafe.

The reason why California deems this gun unsafe is that it's not on the California gun roster.

California has a list of guns that Californians are allowed to own.

This list is how California's back-door way to ban guns.

So it's safe enough for LAPD to use the FN MRD as their duty gun but not safe enough for California citizens to use it to protect their lives.

That makes no sense. That's how silly and hypocritical these gun laws are.

California's gun roster is not only bullshit; it's elitist, and this proves it.

They will always say it's for your safety when in reality, it's for their control.

 
LAPD gets a firearms which is not on the approved CA Safety list ...



California Says LAPD New Service Pistol Safe For Police But Not For Civilians

LAPD Fn 509 MRD
StackPath

California gun laws are designed to punish gun owners and not keep them safe, and here is yet another example.

I currently own the MRD, and I had no issues with this gun, so it was no surprise when I learned that the Los Angeles Police Department Selected the FN 509 MRD as their new Duty Pistol.

But here's where it gets ironic. LAPD thought so highly of the FN 509 MRD that it decided to make it the official duty gun of all LAPD cops.

Still, right now, if you live in California, you can't own the FN 509 MRD as a citizen.

FN legally can't sell this gun to people in California because California thinks the FN 509 MRD is unsafe.

The reason why California deems this gun unsafe is that it's not on the California gun roster.

California has a list of guns that Californians are allowed to own.

This list is how California's back-door way to ban guns.

So it's safe enough for LAPD to use the FN MRD as their duty gun but not safe enough for California citizens to use it to protect their lives.

That makes no sense. That's how silly and hypocritical these gun laws are.

California's gun roster is not only bullshit; it's elitist, and this proves it.

They will always say it's for your safety when in reality, it's for their control.



Makes me want to buy a FN 509 MRD but I need another gun like I need another camera - so I'll probably end up getting both. Well, at least the gun doesn't depend on microchips.
 
LAPD gets a firearms which is not on the approved CA Safety list ...



California Says LAPD New Service Pistol Safe For Police But Not For Civilians

LAPD Fn 509 MRD
StackPath

California gun laws are designed to punish gun owners and not keep them safe, and here is yet another example.

I currently own the MRD, and I had no issues with this gun, so it was no surprise when I learned that the Los Angeles Police Department Selected the FN 509 MRD as their new Duty Pistol.

But here's where it gets ironic. LAPD thought so highly of the FN 509 MRD that it decided to make it the official duty gun of all LAPD cops.

Still, right now, if you live in California, you can't own the FN 509 MRD as a citizen.

FN legally can't sell this gun to people in California because California thinks the FN 509 MRD is unsafe.

The reason why California deems this gun unsafe is that it's not on the California gun roster.

California has a list of guns that Californians are allowed to own.

This list is how California's back-door way to ban guns.

So it's safe enough for LAPD to use the FN MRD as their duty gun but not safe enough for California citizens to use it to protect their lives.

That makes no sense. That's how silly and hypocritical these gun laws are.

California's gun roster is not only bullshit; it's elitist, and this proves it.

They will always say it's for your safety when in reality, it's for their control.



The CA Roster is stupidity at its finest. Lets say a Gen 3 gun received safety features and is currently at gen 6... Well that gen 6 isn't legal there because CA wants manufacturers to pay a heavy fee to get back on that roster.. It doesn't stop there. CA about two years ago passed a bill that any NEW gun allowed into CA needs to be able to mark empty casings with the gun serial number. Anyone know of a firearm that is capable of that yet?!


Same old CA dictatorship..
 
Last edited:
Makes me want to buy a FN 509 MRD but I need another gun like I need another camera - so I'll probably end up getting both.
Love your logic!!
Mind if I quote you to my wife so she'll know I don't need a psych eval?
<again>

:highfive: :p:lmao: