Blue Iris not retaining IP address after power loss

Yeah, that one got a lot of us when Ken made that 'improvement' to BI at one point. Just check it to be skipped/off whenever you set up a new cam. I have Omada too so I'm familiar with it.

Mike is there a reason why not having that box checked caused a problem in this case? I don’t have it checked at all and using Ubiquiti equipment I never had any issues like that. Is this something specific to TP-link equipment? I know Sonnie mentioned that these cameras weren’t on the Omada controller.
 
Mike is there a reason why not having that box checked caused a problem in this case? I don’t have it checked at all and using Ubiquiti equipment I never had any issues like that. Is this something specific to TP-link equipment? I know Sonnie mentioned that these cameras weren’t on the Omada controller.

it has nothing to do with omada or tplink
not sure why you always try to find a network problem.

Like Mike says, its a blueiris problem. And if you search for it, you find people having the same problem without using any omada stuff.

In theory it should be a good feature because people use DHCP. Most consumer cams are dhcp by default.
So blueiris is able to follow the camera if the dhcp lease get revoked.



 
Last edited:
it has nothing to do with omada or tplink
not sure why you always try to find a network problem.

Like Mike says, its a blueiris problem. And if you search for it, you find people having the same problem without using any omada stuff.

In theory it should be a good feature because people use DHCP. Most consumer cams are dhcp by default.
So blueiris is able to follow the camera if the dhcp lease get revoked.

I appreciate the response. The BI setting obviously is network related (or we’d all have this problem) but my actual question was why would some folks have issues and others not? What circumstances or situations create this issue? We already know what the fix is but none of those threads explained why it occurs. I’m trying to understand more about BI and cameras even if just for my own setup so an honest answer would be helpful here.
 
All that's happening is that BI's associating an IP address with a given cam's MAC address. The problem should only happen if BI had at some point seen a camera at a different IP address vs what's last used/now wanted. Been a while and I don't recall now exactly why/how it gets out of sync and wants to use the old IP address. It may be using what it saw when first added but I wouldn't swear to that. I think that may have been later tweaked some too given that many had problems and I didn't keep up with the details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDreaming and MTL4
I had a issue like this last year, might be this as well:

 
  • Like
Reactions: JDreaming
Mike is there a reason why not having that box checked caused a problem in this case? I don’t have it checked at all and using Ubiquiti equipment I never had any issues like that. Is this something specific to TP-link equipment? I know Sonnie mentioned that these cameras weren’t on the Omada controller.
When did I say that? If I did, I miscommunicated... sorry. OR... maybe that was in another thread back when I did not have the camera connected to network and was pushing them straight to the PC second port, which I changed and now using a VPN and plan to create another VLAN as well. The controller sees the entire network. While I set the static IP in each camera, I also set it in the Omada controller as static.
 
When did I say that? If I did, I miscommunicated... sorry. OR... maybe that was in another thread back when I did not have the camera connected to network and was pushing them straight to the PC second port, which I changed and now using a VPN and plan to create another VLAN as well. The controller sees the entire network. While I set the static IP in each camera, I also set it in the Omada controller as static.

No worries, I just misunderstood. I think it was post #17 that threw me off where you mentioned accessing the cameras and the controller was out of the picture. Makes perfect sense how you have it configured because it would be a pain to pull off all that VLAN routing without it. Sounds like you’re really set up well now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sonnie