BlueIris 8 Cameras CPU spikes (Yes I applied fixes recommended here)

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
HI,

I've done lots of reading which helped lowered the CPU usage down to 70% from 100%, however I will be adding 5 more cameras and I'm afraid it will not handle it. I've already selected direct record and I have one screen 24/7 with live view, here is the current setup.

Dedicated PC fore BI:
- i5-3570k @ 4.20GHz (overclocked)
- 32gb DD3
- 120gb Samsung SSD (OS & BI)
- 4TB WD RED (recording
- ATI Fire v4800 vcard

8 Cameras: (I know you all think these are shit because of no iFrame settings, but I got them at $50 during cybermonday)
- ReoLink RLC-410
- Running Default configs

Questions:

1. Besides iFrame, Direct Record or sacrificing quality which defeats the point of buying 4pm cameras, what else can I do to lower my cpu usage as I add more cameras?

2. I will be buying 5 more cameras, I see most people recommend Dahua(?) but they seem a bit expensive. My budget is limited to under $100, what do you recommend?

3. I have a 1u server with 2x xeon E5620 2.4GHz Processors, would this allow me to add the 5 more cameras I want and keep reasonable CPU usage?

4. I'm new around, any recommendations to make my homemade NVR run smoother will be much appreciated.
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,903
Reaction score
21,275
Lower the fps to 10-15....and lower the live preview frame rate to 10 or less.
Enable hardware acceleration remove that crap v4800 that is a huge power hog and use intel HD so that you can use hardware acceleration, this will dramatically reduce cpu consumption.
there is not that much of a difference between the image quality of the camera when set to 1080p vs 4mp...you fell for marketing gimmicks...some of the best cameras are 1080p.
Buy the dahua 1080p starlight turret...pay more, get quality...you already got screwed with reolink.
the e5620 server is old and outdated and a huge power hog, it will cost you more to run it than buying a modern i7-6700 skylake system.
record to bvr - its most efficient not mp4 etc.
 

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Sounds good I'll give it a shot, what do you mean by record to "bvr"? I couldn't find anything by dahua 1080p starlight turret, but I'll see if reolink will issue a return based on the no iFrame settings since I purchased it about 1 and half months ago.

PS- One thing i forgot to mention, I have sound recording on 4 of the cameras as I turned it off on the others and the CPU stailized
 

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I removed the video card and instantly noticed a drop on CPU usage, I tried HD hardware accelerator h.264 and blacked out all cameras even after restarting multiple times, then tried videopostproc and same deal.
Hard to find someone selling, aliexpress has it for $170 that's crazy.
 
Last edited:

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,903
Reaction score
21,275
Sounds good I'll give it a shot, what do you mean by record to "bvr"? I couldn't find anything by dahua 1080p starlight turret, but I'll see if reolink will issue a return based on the no iFrame settings since I purchased it about 1 and half months ago.

PS- One thing i forgot to mention, I have sound recording on 4 of the cameras as I turned it off on the others and the CPU stailized
blue iris dvr format
 

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
It's already recording with a .bvr as default settings, any idea why intel accelerator blacks out the cameras? During the day I'm running at 80-90% CPU and 55-60% at night
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,903
Reaction score
21,275
It's already recording with a .bvr as default settings, any idea why intel accelerator blacks out the cameras? During the day I'm running at 80-90% CPU and 55-60% at night
it will do that if your are using windows 7 AND running as as service.
and 170 for that starlight turret is an excellent price...its a night and day difference over the standard dahua/hikvision cameras.
 

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I do have windows 7 and running as a services, I'll try removing the service... what other OS should I install?
 

k2ace

n3wb
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Not sure if you have check/tried this but the default power plan on most, if not all, versions of windows is balanced. Running high performance plan can reduce CPU utilization. In my case a balanced plan runs at 60-70%, high performance runs around 5-10%. This is running Server 2008 R2 on a i5-4590. I currently have 7 cameras, 3 cameras are 1920x1080, 1 is 1280x800, and 3 are 640x480. They are running 10fps in trigger + continuous each 1 second.
 

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,903
Reaction score
21,275
Not sure if you have check/tried this but the default power plan on most, if not all, versions of windows is balanced. Running high performance plan can reduce CPU utilization. In my case a balanced plan runs at 60-70%, high performance runs around 5-10%. This is running Server 2008 R2 on a i5-4590. I currently have 7 cameras, 3 cameras are 1920x1080, 1 is 1280x800, and 3 are 640x480. They are running 10fps in trigger + continuous each 1 second.
Trigger + continuously mode is often misunderstood..you are not recording continuously...see the help file, you likely want to set the record tab to continuous..
 

Frank

n3wb
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Running at 40-50% now after installing windows 10 pro and hardware acceleration mode! Would it give me better performance if I do continuous recording?
 
Top