Hardware requirements for a large 60 camera system

I am not in the office today but I will share some screenshots of the software I use and the resources it takes when I can more easily VNC into some good examples. I use Exacq and the licensing is more, but my hardware requirements are tiny, as in SUPER small. I prefer this in larger deployments as there is less expensive special hardware to break and or maintain. I need to be able able to use almost any system, any time if and when a failure happens. My hardware requirements are so small I literally never worry about the hardware in any of my deployments as any basic machine will work fine.

Here is my system at home for example. This machine is using 9 3mp IP cameras, 1 2mp camera, and 5 analogs. With the client closed the software runs as a service, no need to run the client at all on the machine doing the recording if you do not want to. If I need to review footage the client runs on any machine so I can review the footage without messing with the actual NVR machine so it gets less load if I want. I can review on the machine too of course, but in my cases the NVR is usually out of the way so using the software on my desktop or laptop is easier.

This is with the client closed of course, but it is actively running and recording on motion. The example I'm showing you is a three year old i3 machine with only 2gb of ram.

attachment.php
attachment.php


I can show some some better 20-30 3mp camera examples later if you want easily enough also running on just an i3 with 2gb. Normally I use i5s now just because, but I have 10-12 cameras in some locations running on old single core Pentium systems! Saves me on power, heat, and general wear and tear on a super high end system. In three or four years if I want to replace the old machine it is easy, any normal machine will work fine thus saving me upgrade headaches. With the number of cameras and systems I have I need that part to be as easy as possible!

I'll share some more info later when I have access to real numbers for you.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    102 KB · Views: 135
  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    18.8 KB · Views: 131
Thanks Razer for sharing your setup info......you lightened up things :)

OK, could you share with me the prices of Excaq ?

Please give me some hope :)
 
OK,....been doing some searches and found Excaq Pro license per camera 120$ !!!....oh my God !!!!

So if I need a 64ch system I'll pay a sum of 7680$ !!!!.....this is totally unacceptable

Thank You BlueIris :)......over and out

It has been a pleasure talking to you Fenderman, and you too Razer
 
OK,....been doing some searches and found Excaq Pro license per camera 120$ !!!....oh my God !!!!

So if I need a 64ch system I'll pay a sum of 7680$ !!!!.....this is totally unacceptable

Thank You BlueIris :)......over and out

It has been a pleasure talking to you Fenderman, and you too Razer

Yes, all my cameras run at full resolution. I'm getting the 4mp cameras as soon as LTS gets them in stock! Exacq start would work fine for you and is $40 per camera, but they limit that to only 16 cameras. That is dumb.


I agree it is expensive, but for me worth it. You'll spend much more on a machine to run BI well and then deal with all the other issues people have. I'd be fine with BI at home but it would never work for business for for very, very large roll-outs. Exacq is set and forget and I need that reliability and ease of hardware. If you are going for lowest flat out price then BI will win. Best ease of use and lowest hardware requirements and multi site integration is exacq all the way.

Remember that for exacq you could be up and going on the hardware side for 1k and have 9tb of storage for example. I bet you are close to $4,000 or more to get 64 BI cameras running well as you may well need dual i7 processors! You might have to do do a dual processor xeon server, who knows but I do know from reading that one i7 will likely not be enough for 64 cameras in BI no matter what i7 you get.

Let us know what hardware you end up with if you can get it running well, and hopefully not above say 70% processor usage so as to not kill your machine too quickly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmrEmarah
If you stick with blue iris you are probably better off simply running two i7 machines....if you alternate the cameras properly, this can give so some redundancy (if a machine goes down you have the other half of the cameras operational)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmrEmarah
You might try IVMS-4200. Supports up do 256 devices. Run the NVR Server in background and let all the cameras do the analytics. The server uses very little CPU to record. Using the Client is another story, but you aren't going to watch/playback every channel at same time anyways.